September 2010 - stunnel-users

Stunnel 4 failing to connect to gmail
by Asif Iqbal 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

I am faling to connect to gmail. Not sure what that bind error means. iqbala@ghar:~$ sudo stunnel4 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Private key loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SSL context initialized for service ssmtp 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: stunnel 4.22 on i486-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: file ulimit = 1024 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: 500 clients allowed 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 10 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 11 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 12 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: Error binding ssmtp to 74.125.93.111:587 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: bind: Cannot assign requested address (99) Here is how my conf file looks like iqbala@ghar:~$ cat /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf | egrep -v "^;|^$" cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem foreground = yes sslVersion = SSLv3 chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4/ setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 pid = /stunnel4.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log client = yes [ssmtp] accept = smtp.gmail.com:587 connect = 25 Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu

5 9

Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel on the same machine
by subrata＠indiatimes.com 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

The configuration files are : pid = /var/stunnel.pid ;chroot = /var/lib/stunnel setuid = nobody setgid = nobody foreground =yes ; Use it for client mode client = yes ; Service-level configuration [pop3s] accept = 995 connect = 110 [imaps] accept = 993 connect = 143 [ssmtp] accept = 465 connect = 25 [mysqls] accept = 3307 connect = 192.168.1.6:3307 On 192.168.1.6 ---------------------- pid = /var/stunnel.pid setuid =nobody setgid = nobody foreground = yes client = no ; Service-level configuration [pop3s] accept = 995 connect = 110 [imaps] accept = 993 connect = 143 [ssmtp] accept = 465 connect = 25 [mysqls] accept =3307 connect =3306 connecting like /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysql -h 127.0.0.1 -u root -p -P 3307 Enter password: On entring password the following lines appear : ERROR 2013 (HY000): Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 104 Subrata ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Hatch <bri(a)stunnel.org> To: subrata(a)indiatimes.com Sent: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:02:17 +0530 (IST) Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel on the same machine Near 2007-10-05 22:17 +0530, subrata(a)indiatimes.com insisted: > After starting stunnel and connecting the mysql client/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysql -h 127.0.0.1 -u root -p the flow gets stuck at the Enter password prompt any suggestions how to proceed from there. What do your stunnel configuration files look like? Other problem: mysql client may decide to use a local domain socket when connecting to localhost, thwarting your attempts to go via Stunnel. You might want to 'strace mysql ...' and look for the connect() lines. -- Brian Hatch Time flies like an Systems and arrow. Fruit flies Security Engineer like a banana. http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ Every message PGP signed -- My life has changed. What about yours? Log on to the new Indiatimes Mail and Live out of the Inbox!

3 3

Stunnel 4.33 released
by Michal Trojnara 22 Apr '11

22 Apr '11

The ChangeLog entry: Version 4.33, 2010.04.05, urgency: MEDIUM: * New features - Win32 DLLs for OpenSSL 1.0.0. This library requires to c_rehash CApath/CRLpath directories on upgrade. - Win32 DLLs for zlib 1.2.4. - Experimental support for local mode on WIN32 platform. Try "exec = c:\windows\system32\cmd.exe". * Bugfixes - Inetd mode fixed SHA-1 value for stunnel-4.33.tar.gz: 695c7ef834952cb8ddbc790e10b6e32798fc2767 Home page: http://stunnel.mirt.net/ Download: ftp://stunnel.mirt.net/stunnel/ Best regards, Michal Trojnara

4 6

SMPP Protocol and STunnel
by Pathak, Apurva (Apu) 23 Nov '10

23 Nov '10

Hello, I would like to find out if I can use STunnel as follows: I have a stand alone C# executable program that uses a third party SDK that implements SMPP protocol and sends SMS text messages with wireless carriers. Recently, one of the wireless carriers wants us to implement SSL Client Authentication and wants SMPP messages that are exchanged with them to be encrypted after the client authentication is done. I want to find out if I can use STunnel running so that STunnel can encrypt and decrypt the messages exchanged between my program and the carrier's SMS server. (1) Is this possible with STunnel? (2) What are the steps involved? I am on the Windows Server 2003 platform. I would really appreciate a reply. Thanks, Apu

3 12

public domain [PATCH] to stunnel 4.34 for Windows CE / Windows Mobile, "no service" CRITICAL bug and unicode bugs fixed
by Pierre DELAAGE 17 Nov '10

17 Nov '10

Dear All, Please find enclosed a patch in "diff -cr orig patched" format, applying to stunnel4.34 as found here ftp://stunnel.mirt.net/stunnel/. This patch mainly addresses compilation and unicode issues for Windows CE targets + ONE critical issue preventing stunnel to service anything (!). I use MS EVC 4sp2 compiler with WCE 420 SDK, on a vista host platform. Once debugged the code works fine on WM6 HTC smartphones. Should work on WM5. It needs a windows CE openssl lib (I recompiled MY patched version of openssl 1.0.0a successfully: I will have to log a patch to those gentlemen, hoping that they are open to integrate it, something not so obvious in the past). I will later post here a link to my patch for openssl 100a pointing to the openssl mailing list. THIS OPENSSL PATCH IS ESSENTIAL : with my older version of openssl 098pre_j for wce, stunnel does not work anymore (it crashes after first cnx). The present stunnel patch addresses the following issues : ************* I] COMPILATION FAILURES 1/ on common.h "EINVAL redefinition" : in fact the compile options WX (see evc.mak) does not tolerate any warning : The MS evc420 compiler ALWAYS issues a warning on this symbol redefinition. Michal and I are dealing with it since month... But, considering that NEITHER Exxx error codes are used in stunnel, I suggest that in fact ALL these redef should be suppressed. TODO: In the future a proper rewrite of code in log.c, where hardcoded values of WSA error codes are used instead of symbolic constant, will have to be done. 2/ client.c CreateProcess is a UNICODE function: code was ascii only. Code has been adapted to work in unicode. 3/ evc.mak path to new openssl lib has been redefined. proper location for the libs in openssl tree has been set in the make-install block (although this block is presently USELESS and needs a complete rewrite). 4/ gui.c All code using hmainmenu is OFF under winCE. So some new lines involving it were not compiling. 5/ options.c linger_val.l_linger and linger_val.l_onoff require ushort values. Strict type checking of the compiler required a proper cast to ushort of the r-values. stralloc uses "strdup": on Win32 and winCE strdup is _strdup (!). 6/ prototypes.h : _beginthread was defined as returning an int, an a long in sthread.c. After some checking in various documentations, long is the correct type, in particular because _beginthread can return the special error value "-1L". So that unsigned types are illogical. This simplifies the code in some locations, by saving some -now useless- casts. 7/ sthread.c create_client: suppressed some useless cast to (long) for beginthread. ************* II] OPERATIONAL ERRORS (at run-time) This is a reminder of previous notification to the mailing list : due to beginthread improper code and/or use, It is presently IMPOSSIBLE for stunnel 434 to be used in production on WCE: it is just unable to service any...service. Nothing happens if, for example, you use it to connect to an https server. No log either ! I corrected the code with both Michal patch to gui.c and mine to sthread.c: gui.c (Michal patch) : _beginthread was called with 0 as stacksize which, cumulated to an improper coding of sthread/beginthread, led to FAILURE of service thread creation. sthread.c: _beginthread : now supports "0" stacksize value, leading to default linker stack size (1MB by default unless specified differently on the linker command line, something we do not yet perform but could). ************* III] MINOR IMPROVMENT _beginthread: added a log on critical event of "failure" to create a service thread. because I think it is a critical event, isn't it? I hope you will find this patch useful. Thank you for your excellent work, Yours sincerely, Pierre Delaage Note : I use stunnel to establish a simple "vpn" between smartphones and a corporate linux server mainly for HTTPS/POPS/SMTPS support. Stunnel is very relevant in that matter, over solutions based on SSH (although we use also ssh), from a communication cost point of view : ssh establishes permanent socket between client and server, so that the communication is charged by the mobile network provider : and these charges are very expensive. On the contrary stunnel only establishes ssl sockets on demand so that financial charges are limited to strict necessary. Please note that stunnel brings "client based certificate authentication" to POP/SMTP mobile mail user agents which only BASICALLY supports SSL with server authentication, but NO client authentication, such as M$ Outlook for Mobile (unless you pay for an exchange server and exchange client licence). Here again stunnel is very relevant. Note 2 : the strdup and unicode bug fixes should benefit also to the win32 (for PC) stunnel version for PC.

1 1

fingerprint does not match
by Nelson 02 Oct '10

02 Oct '10

I have a running machine with stunnel installed for HTTPS services. Now, I want to setup another machine using the same configuration and key from my 1ST machine. I have installed stunnel patch with x-forwarded-for. However, everytime I try to start it up, it shows: Starting universal SSL tunnel: stunnelReading configuration from file /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf FIPS_mode_set: 2D06C06E: error:2D06C06E:FIPS routines:FIPS_mode_set:fingerprint does not match failed. I'm using the same key and cert that my 1ST machine is using. Would there be a problem? I've no problem starting stunnel yesterday. I just encountered this error when I change my ip address. I make sure that my config also listen to this ip address. Would anyone know how to fix this problem? Tried to Google but to no avail.

3 2

pop3 stunnel nmh to gmail
by Joseph Brenner 27 Sep '10

27 Sep '10

I'm an nmh user running ubuntu jaunty, and I want to get my local email working over SSL connections to a gmail account (POP3/SMTP). So I'm trying to get some form of mh to talk over SSL using stunnel4. I'm looking for suggestions on what I might be doing wrong, and hints on how to go about isolating the problems. I've succeeded in using slypheed to get mail from gmail, so I know the gmail account is working and is set-up for pop3 and so on. When I run mh's inc command, though, it just reports: "inc: no servers available" I can see that I've got stunnel running by doing a: ps ax | egrep stun | egrep -v egrep 5937 ? SN 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 5938 ? SN 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 5939 ? SN 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 5940 ? SN 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 5941 ? SN 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 5942 ? SNs 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf Google has some instructions up about servers and port numbers (but no examples specific to stunnel): http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=13287 Here's a summary of the kind of configurations I've been trying: /etc/default/stunnel4: ENABLED=1 FILES="/etc/stunnel/*.conf" OPTIONS="" PPP_RESTART=0 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf: sslVersion = SSLv3 chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4/ setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 pid = /stunnel4.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log client = yes [pop3s] accept = 127.0.0.1:995 connect = pop.gmail.com:110 [smtps] accept = 127.0.0.1:465 connect = smtp.gmail.com:25 /etc/nmh/mts.conf: mts: smtp hostable: /etc/nmh/hosts localname: smtp.gmail.com # localname: gmail.com masquerade: mmdfldir: /var/mail mmdflfil: # pophost: localhost # pophost: pop.gmail.com:995 pophost: pop.gmail.com:110 # pophost: pop.gmail.com # servers: localhost servers: smtp.gmail.com /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /dev/urandom 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: PRNG seeded successfully 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: SSL context initialized for service pop3s 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: SSL context initialized for service imaps 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: SSL context initialized for service smtps 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG5[6528:140533218399984]: stunnel 4.22 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG5[6528:140533218399984]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG6[6528:140533218399984]: file ulimit = 1024 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG6[6528:140533218399984]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG5[6528:140533218399984]: 500 clients allowed 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: FD 10 in non-blocking mode 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: FD 11 in non-blocking mode 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: FD 12 in non-blocking mode 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: pop3s bound to 127.0.0.1:1109 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: FD 13 in non-blocking mode 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: imaps bound to 0.0.0.0:993 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: FD 14 in non-blocking mode 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6528:140533218399984]: smtps bound to 127.0.0.1:259 2010.09.21 11:11:41 LOG7[6534:140533218399984]: Created pid file /stunnel4.pid /var/log/mail.log Sep 21 13:40:32 fineline gnu-pop3d[15484]: Incoming connection opened Sep 21 13:40:32 fineline gnu-pop3d[15484]: connect from 127.0.0.1 Sep 21 13:40:32 fineline gnu-pop3d[15484]: User `doomvox(a)gmail.com': nonexistent Sep 21 13:40:32 fineline gnu-pop3d[15484]: Session ended for no user I'm using the "stunnel4" package for ubuntu jaunty: /usr/bin/stunnel4 -version stunnel 4.22 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP Global options debug = 5 pid = /var/run/stunnel4.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem ciphers = AES:ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL:+RC4:@STRENGTH key = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem session = 300 seconds stack = 65536 bytes sslVersion = SSLv3 for client, all for server TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none uname -a Linux fineline 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 12:47:45 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.3 --program-suffix=-4.3 --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-objc-gc --enable-mpfr --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007

2 1

Critical error on stunnel 434 for WinCE/Windows Mobile: no service at all, because of failure in thread creation
by Pierre DELAAGE 26 Sep '10

26 Sep '10

Hello Michal, Maybe you remember me, I am the man that refreshed stunnel for winCE up to 4.27 version. Thank you for having included my code to your mainstream at that time. As a win32 regular programmer I always check that my code is as close as possible as that of the main win32 stream for PC. I am writing you today to point out a critical bug that prevent stunnel 4.34 from servicing any service at all . I have fixed that bug and will send you a refresh of all the sources (that needed some after some win32 PC version updates) soon. SO DO NOT DO ANYTHING. the bug is in sthread.c: the wince _beginthread port has been modified (by someone else but me) as this : v434: handle=CreateThread(NULL, stack_size, (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)start_address, arglist, STACK_SIZE_PARAM_IS_A_RESERVATION, &thread_id); the "STACK_SIZE_PARAM_IS_A_RESERVATION" flag is the novelty from 4.27. The problem is that beginthread is being called from gui.c with stacksize=0 SO THAT a stack of 0 size "TRIES to be RESERVED" and then CreateThread FAILS to return a valid handle. That is to say that no thread is created, and thus NO TUNNELING SERVICE at all can be delivered. So stunnel cannot work at all. Solution : the proper call is : handle=CreateThread(NULL, stack_size, (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)start_address, arglist, (stack_size > 0) ? STACK_SIZE_PARAM_IS_A_RESERVATION:0, &thread_id); I repeat and insist : please DO NOT DO anything to the code, as I will send soon a refresh with various other updates (because apart from that critical bug, the code needs other refresh to compile properly), and as I am also working on a refresh of openssl up to 1.0.0a (those gentlemen at openssl never included any wce patch to their mainstream, which is really a pity, but another story). See you soon, Thank you again for all the work you do for the community of people, Pierre

2 4

stunnel v4.32 & mac v10.6.3
by Cherry Ngai 25 Sep '10

25 Sep '10

Hello, I am new to stunnel. My stunnel v4.32 is installed to my mac v10.6.3 using MacPort. I am trying to setup active directory, but there is no process start when i run sudo /opt/local/bin/stunnel /opt/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf There is no error msg after i run the command. I believe it could have something to do with my configuration? Having it running in debug mode, I can't find the created output file. Could someone help me? Or tell me where i can find the output file? Thanks! Stunnel seems successfully installed, as it has returned the following with the command "sudo stunnel -version" stunnel 4.32 on i686-apple-darwin10.3.0 with OpenSSL 1.0.0a 1 Jun 2010 Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP Global options debug = daemon.notice pid = /opt/local/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options cert = /opt/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem ciphers = ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL:!SSLv2 session = 300 seconds stack = 65536 bytes sslVersion = SSLv3 for client, all for server TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none Here is my config: cert = /opt/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem key = /opt/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem sslVersion = SSLv3 chroot = /opt/local/var/lib/stunnel/ setuid = nobody setgid = nogroup pid = /stunnel.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = stunnel.log client = yes [ActiveDirectory1] accept = 391 connect = SOME_IP:636 Cheers, Cherry

1 0

Target version/timeframe for drawing identity certs from Windows cert store?
by Bucci, David G 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Hi - in an exchange last week, Michal, it sounded like you might be planning on adding the capability/option to the Windows version to select an identity certificate from the Windows certificate store (because it turns out OpenSSL added some supporting infrastructure for doing so, if I understood correctly). For planning purposes, do you have any sense yet of whether that's really going to happen, and in what timeframe or what target version? I think that'd be a change of high interest to a lot of people ... one suggestion, it would help integrators if there was a way to configure a msg into whatever selection dialog that comes up, asking the user to select a certificate from their identity store. Thinking out loud -- probably also, in the case where multiple client tunnels are being set up, a way to make it either a global selection (for all client services), or a service specific selection -- hmm, though global only is probably fine, thinking about, since an integrator could always create a 2nd config, if a 2nd tunnel is needed Thinking further, you would probably want to be careful that it would work early on during login, since I imagine like us, integrators would want to start it from a user's Startup folder, or from a login script. I don't know Windows well enough to know if that constrains you (if the window mgr is up during login script exec, etc.). Thx! ---- David G. Bucci If you can't think of anything kind to say, could you at least have the decency to be vague?

1 0