- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

Compiling Stunnel For Windows
by Albert 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Hi, I want to compile stunnel for windows, to include the XMPP patch (that I managed to apply cleanly to the current stunnel code) that I saw on the mailing list earlier as I need to get it to connect to a SSL only server in client mode. I followed the instructions in the Install.w32 file 1) apt-get install gcc-mingw32 - Worked fine with no issues 2) Download the recent zlib from http://www.zlib.net/ , Update the following definitions in win32/Makefile.gcc file: etc *snip* Worked fine as far as I can tell 3) Download the recent OpenSSL in unpack it to /usr/src/ directory., cd /usr/src && tar zvxf ~/openssl-(version).tar.gz I got OpenSSL 1.0.0d 4) Build OpenSSL with cross_mingw32.sh script. I ran instead ./Configure --cross-compile-prefix=i586-mingw32msvc- mingw shared zlib-dynamic && make it seems to have worked fine 5) Download and unpack stunnel-(version).tar.gz. -got stunnel 4.42 6) Configure stunnel. cd stunnel-(version) && ./configure --with-ssl=/path/to/openssl-(version) This step worked fine 7) Build windows executable. cd src && make stunnel.exe The first few compile steps work fine, but I get stuck on: ...i586-mingw32msvc/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto.dll I did a few hours of troubleshooting and trying to move a few files around but couldn't find crypto.dll anywhere I'm running a fresh install of Ubuntu 11.04 in a VM if that makes any difference. Help would be greatly appreciated :) Thanks, Albert

2 1

Changing the secure tunnel 'encryption' method ....
by VANDOOREN, Pascal 02 Sep '11

02 Sep '11

Hello Everyone, I have a question, Why use you a certificate and not a hash AES, or other crypting algorithm to make a secure tunnel ? Because i use not a validate cert and i can only generate a cert valid for maximum 1year ... In the config file you can let the choice to use the cert or hash .. It's only a idea Kind regards Pascal -- This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the addressee or an authorized recipient of this message, any distribution, copying, publication or use of this information for any purpose is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and then delete this message. Ce message est confidentiel. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire designe de ce message ou une personne autorisee a l'utiliser, toute distribution, copie, publication ou usage a quelques fins que ce soit des informations contenues dans ce message sont interdits. Merci d'informer immediatement l'expediteur par messagerie electronique et d'ensuite detruire ce message. --

1 0

Windows version not starting when Run
by Dayo Akande 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

The main thing that I'm seeing as the error is: "Could not load DH parameters from stunnel.pem" Below is the entire log file, I am so stumped here. I appreciate any help. No limit detected for the number of clients make_sockets: s_socket#1: FD=272 allocated (blocking mode) make_sockets: s_socket#2: FD=276 allocated (blocking mode) make_sockets: s_accept: FD=292 allocated (non-blocking mode) stunnel 4.42 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu platform Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.0d 8 Feb 2011 Threading:WIN32 SSL:ENGINE Auth:none Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd PRNG seeded successfully Initializing SSL context for service pop3s Certificate: stunnel.pem Certificate loaded Key file: stunnel.pem Private key loaded Could not load DH parameters from stunnel.pem Using hardcoded DH parameters DH initialized with 2048-bit key ECDH initialized with curve prime256v1 SSL options set: 0x01180004 SSL context initialized Initializing SSL context for service imaps Certificate: stunnel.pem Certificate loaded Key file: stunnel.pem Private key loaded Could not load DH parameters from stunnel.pem Using hardcoded DH parameters DH initialized with 2048-bit key ECDH initialized with curve prime256v1 SSL options set: 0x01180004 SSL context initialized Line 91: "socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 ": Specified option name is not valid here str_stats: 152 block(s), 11942 byte(s) Server is down

2 2

Re: [stunnel-users] CRL
by Uldis Biks 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

1 0

CRL
by Uldis Biks 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

2 2

stunnel : binding in ipv6+ipv4 : problem
by Guylhem Aznar 27 Aug '11

27 Aug '11

Hello I have a problem with stunnel : I just don't know how to specify 2 different port forwarding, one for all ipv4 connections to port 443, the other for all ipv6 connections. Either one seem to work, but I can't have both at the same time. In my /etc/hosts : 127.0.0.1 localhost ::1 localhost6 0.0.0.0 listenall4 :: listenall6 In my stunnel.conf: [sslh] accept = listenall4:443 connect = 127.0.0.1:444 TIMEOUTclose = 0 [ssl6] accept = listenall6:443 connect = 6.guylhem.org:80 TIMEOUTclose = 0 I have read that linux can block ipv6 sockets if the ipv4 socket is created first, but here the order doesn't change anything. I though that stunnel was ipv6 capable, but apparently it doesn't play well with ipv4 on the same port. So I tried to remove one of the listenall : the listenall4 is important, but listenall6 is not. Yet giving a AAAA only host like 6.guylhem.org does not help - even if it goes before the listenall4. So I'm stuck. Has anyone patched stunnel for such a situation? Guylhem

1 0

FW: Mysql doesnt run with stunnel
by Freeh Sophia 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

Craig Retief <stunnel <at> rsw.co.za> writes: > > I see that on your server you have specified your config for mysqls like > this: > Hi Craig, That fixed it for me. Thanks! Freeh Sophia Marketing GmbH Emanuelstr. 3, 10317 Berlin Deutschland Telefon: +49 (33) 5310967 Email: freehsophia(a)gmail.com Site: http://flug.airego.de/

1 0

stunnel4 tcp_nodelay
by Madhu R 21 Aug '11

21 Aug '11

Hi, We are using stunnel in order to tunnel http proxy traffic. Is it better in this case to turn on Nagle's algo? I have tried to set socket=l:TCP_NODELAY=0 and socket=r:TCP_NODELAY=0 in the global config, but when I look at debug log it keeps saying option tcp_nodelay is set on local and remote socket. Is this a bug, or is there a different way of turning off tcp_nodelay (since I understand this is on by default now) Regds

1 0

Security issue in 4.4X effect older version?
by Richard L. Houston 19 Aug '11

19 Aug '11

Hi All, Sorry if this has been asked and answered. Saw the security warning about Stunnel 4.40 and 4.41 at http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49254/info Are older version vulnerable as well or just those two specific versions? Specificity in the 4.2X series? Thanks for your help. +------------------------------------+ Best regards, -Richard Houston -R.L.H. Consulting -E-Mail rhouston(a)rlhc.net -WWW http://www.rlhc.net -Blog http://www.rlhc.net/blog/ -Twitter http://www.twitter.com/rlhc/

1 0

centos 6 - stunnel 4.42 unusable (libssl trap divide error) in FIPS mode (default)
by draeath 19 Aug '11

19 Aug '11

I just finished building and configuring stunnel 4.42 on my x86_64 CentOS6 box. It appears to run, but not long into the SSL connection stunnel dies. Log info below. This only happens if I do NOT specify --disable-fips during ./configure (as it enables FIPS by default). I assume this is because FIPS compliancy requires a key to have a passphrase, which my key does not have? [root@host stunnel]# tail -f /var/log/stunnel.log /var/log/messages ==> /var/log/stunnel.log <== 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG5[31681:139656510936832]: Service ntop accepted connection from 12.117.176.190:13258 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate A 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write key exchange A 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server done A 2011.08.19 16:27:36 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2011.08.19 16:27:37 LOG7[31681:139656510936832]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client key exchange A ==> /var/log/messages <== Aug 19 16:27:24 host stunnel: LOG5[31680:139656510941120]: FIPS mode enabled Aug 19 16:27:24 host stunnel: LOG6[31680:139656510941120]: Initializing SSL context for service ntop Aug 19 16:27:24 host stunnel: LOG4[31680:139656510941120]: Insecure file permissions on /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem Aug 19 16:27:24 host stunnel: LOG6[31680:139656510941120]: SSL context initialized Aug 19 16:27:24 host stunnel: LOG5[31680:139656510941120]: Configuration successful Aug 19 16:27:36 host stunnel: LOG5[31681:139656510936832]: Service ntop accepted connection from 12.117.176.190:13257 Aug 19 16:27:36 host stunnel: LOG3[31681:139656510936832]: SSL_accept: 1408F10B: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number Aug 19 16:27:36 host stunnel: LOG5[31681:139656510936832]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket Aug 19 16:27:36 host stunnel: LOG5[31681:139656510936832]: Service ntop accepted connection from 12.117.176.190:13258 Aug 19 16:27:37 host kernel: stunnel[31724] trap divide error ip:7f044fd0d3d1 sp:7f0450b98a40 error:0 in libssl.so.1.0.0[7f044fce2000+53000]

1 0

Tr:SIP encryption with stunnel
by margot.basa 19 Aug '11

19 Aug '11

Hello all, Can someone give me information about SIP encryption with stunnel please ? Is it possible to transform a SIP message on TCP into a SIP TLS message with stunnel ? Thank you very much for your help, Regards > Message du 16/08/11 11:38 > De : "margot.basa" > A : stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > Copie à : > Objet : SIP encryption with stunnel > > Hello all, I would like to know if stunnel is able to encrypt a SIP message (UDP or TCP => TLS...) For example: Terminal A can send/receive SIP messages on transport layer UDP or TCP but not TLS. Server B can send/receive SIP messages only in TLS. If terminal A sends a SIP REGISTER message to Server B, does stunnel is able to intercept the message and transform it ? port 5060 => port 5061 TCP => TLS sip uri => sips uri Do you think it's possible with stunnel ? Thank you very much for your input. Regards > > Une messagerie gratuite, garantie à vie et des services en plus, ça vous tente ? Je crée ma boîte mail www.laposte.net

1 0

When X-FORWARDED-FOR for Stunnel ?
by Elodie BOSSIER 19 Aug '11

19 Aug '11

Greetings, Why you don't implement X-FORWARDED-FOR into stunnel ? I have found this patch : http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/patches/stunnel-4.32-xforwarded-for.diff but this on is to much old, i'm with stunnel 4.41 and i can't go to 4.32 because i need SNI, implemented since 4.38 I have attempt to modify the patch to match with the current version, in begining it's ok but not after, all line code have changed and i'm not developer. X-FORWARDED-FOR is very important and exist on mostly all the frontend web and usuable by all the web server. Someone told me to switch to Nginx because X-FORWARDED-FOR don't exist in Stunnel ... I would like stay on Stunnel because it's only a light tunnel. The patch have only 219 lines, could you help me please to addapt it to the version 4.41 and/or add this feature into Stunnel please ? This is the "manual" to apply the patch : http://www.buro9.com/blog/2009/12/07/installing-haproxy-load-balance-http-a… Just need to add "xforwardedfor=yes" into your config file and should be OK. With this feature, I won't have need to "play" with this (censured) of transparent = source, iptables rules, tcpdump and root exec ... Thanks so much ... Elodie.

3 5

stunnel 4.42 released
by Michal Trojnara 18 Aug '11

18 Aug '11

Dear Users, I have released version 4.42 of stunnel. This is a security bugfix release. Upgrade is highly recommended! The ChangeLog entry: Version 4.42, 2011.08.18, urgency: HIGH: * New features - New verify level 0 to request and ignore peer certificate. This feature is useful with the new Windows GUI menu to save cached peer certificate chains, as SSL client certificates are not sent by default. - Manual page has been updated. - Removed support for changing Windows Service name with "service" option. * Bugfixes - Fixed a heap corruption vulnerability in versions 4.40 and 4.41. It may possibly be leveraged to perform DoS or remote code execution attacks. - The -quiet commandline option was applied to *all* message boxes. - Silent install (/S option) no longer attempts to create stunnel.pem. Home page: http://www.stunnel.org/ Download: ftp://ftp.stunnel.org/stunnel/ SHA-256 hash for stunnel-4.42.tar.gz: d33c407bfc4f58070e818081bd082c38f91cab7691ccbb794da63143c535de3b Best regards, Mike

1 0

stunnel transparent mode
by Julian D. Seifert 18 Aug '11

18 Aug '11

Hi List, I have a little issue trying to get stunnel running for encapsulating an existing service with SSL. We are running a really old legacy ircd service and would like to provide SSL for the users without having to actually hack that into the really old code base. (Yes we could just use another more modern software but let's just say there are "political" reasons as to why this is not an option) For an ircd we need transparency as in "the ircd should think the connection is not coming from localhost") ANYWAY... so I am working with stunnel 4.39 right now. First a question if I understand it correctly how stunnel will work. I have the ircd running on IP1:6667. I created a service section like this. [ircd] accept = 7000 connect = 6667 transparent = source (And applied the iptables/routing related stuff mentioned in the documentation) Should this already work? Will stunnel "manipulate" packets so that the IRCD "sees" connections from the Peers IP's? And will the Answers the ircd sends to the peers get "intercepted" by stunnel so it can "remanipulate" the answers into the SSL connection? If I try it like I get "local_bind (original port): Cannot assign requested address (99) stunnel" and clients get connection abort. Or is this what "transparent = both" is for? With 4.39 I had an issue trying to use "transparent = both". Stunnel always displayed an error message saying "Each service must define two endpoints" (more or less). I got it to compile by commenting out the one line in options.c causing the error... #### snip #### } else { /* standalone mode checks */ if((unsigned int)section->option.accept + (unsigned int)section->option.program + (unsigned int)section->option.remote + (unsigned int)section->option.sni #ifndef USE_WIN32 + (unsigned int)section->option.transparent_dst #endif /* USE_WIN32 */ !=2) { section_error(last_line, section->servname, "Each service must define two endpoints"); return 0; } ### snap ### Commented out the line within the ifndef. Anyway... I hope somebody can clarify for me how stunnel works and what transparent mode is the one I need. (I want to transparently provide the ircd service with connections so it seems they are directly from the peers and not from stunnel(localhost)) regards, Julian Seifert -- I hate mondays...

2 7

[[email protected]: Bug#637932: stunnel4: segfault if certificate file cannot be read during verification]
by Rodrigo Gallardo 17 Aug '11

17 Aug '11

----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Leske <Sebastian.Leske(a)sleske.name> ----- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:21:05 +0200 Package: stunnel4 Version: 3:4.40-1 Severity: normal I use certificate verification with stunnel4 (verify=2 in stunnel.conf). I accidentally changed the access rights of a PEM file required for verification to be unreadable. As a consequence, stunnel4 incorrectly reports "Verification error: self signed certificateVerification error: self signed certificate" (the cert in question is not self-signed), then segfaults. With stunnel4 version 4.29-1_i386, this does not occur: stunnel4 correctly reports that it cannot access the PEM file. Log and backtrace (generated with setting foreground=yes in stunnel.conf): Starting program: /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG5[9584:3082946768]: stunnel 4.40 on i486-pc-linux-gnu platform 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG5[9584:3082946768]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.0d 8 Feb 2011 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG5[9584:3082946768]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Auth:LIBWRAP Sockets:POLL,IPv6 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG5[9584:3082946768]: Reading configuration from file /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG6[9584:3082946768]: Compression enabled using zlib method 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG6[9584:3082946768]: Initializing SSL context for service pop3sl 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG6[9584:3082946768]: SSL context initialized 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG6[9584:3082946768]: Initializing SSL context for service https 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG6[9584:3082946768]: SSL context initialized 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG6[9584:3082946768]: Initializing SSL context for service ssmtp 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG6[9584:3082946768]: SSL context initialized 2011.08.15 21:16:54 LOG5[9584:3082946768]: Configuration successful [New Thread 0xb7fdfb70 (LWP 9593)] 2011.08.15 21:16:57 LOG5[9584:3086875504]: Service pop3sl accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:60903 2011.08.15 21:16:57 LOG6[9584:3086875504]: connect_blocking: connecting 213.187.93.221:995 2011.08.15 21:16:57 LOG5[9584:3086875504]: connect_blocking: connected 213.187.93.221:995 2011.08.15 21:16:57 LOG5[9584:3086875504]: Service pop3sl connected remote server from 192.168.1.101:39914 2011.08.15 21:16:57 LOG4[9584:3086875504]: CERT: Verification error: self signed certificate in certificate chain 2011.08.15 21:16:57 LOG4[9584:3086875504]: Certificate check failed: depth=2, /C=BE/O=GlobalSign nv-sa/OU=Root CA/CN=GlobalSign Root CA 2011.08.15 21:16:57 LOG3[9584:3086875504]: error queue: 14090086: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb7fdfb70 (LWP 9593)] 0xb7ca2119 in ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7ca2119 in ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #1 0xb7ca3c1b in calloc () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #2 0x0804cd20 in ?? () #3 0x080574bf in ?? () #4 0x08057529 in ?? () #5 0x08058129 in ?? () #6 0x0804d945 in ?? () #7 0x0804e79b in ?? () #8 0x0804fafe in ?? () #9 0xb7f98c39 in start_thread () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 #10 0xb7d0196e in clone () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages stunnel4 depends on: ii adduser 3.110 add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.13-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.0d-3 SSL shared libraries ii libwrap0 7.6.q-16 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.34 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii openssl 1.0.0d-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii perl-modules 5.12.4-2 Core Perl modules stunnel4 recommends no packages. Versions of packages stunnel4 suggests: pn logcheck-database <none> (no description available) -- no debconf information ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Rodrigo Gallardo

2 1

Sending "LOGOUT" when using StartTLS offloading?
by Markus Borst 17 Aug '11

17 Aug '11

I have to cope with a very unusual imap server behavior, but maybe stunnel can help me: Can stunnel send an imap command ("XX LOGOUT"), just before closing the tcp session? Setup: I use stunnel for SSL/TLS offloading, both via extra port (993) and StartTLS emulation (143). Our imap server (Mercury) has a very peculiar feature: If a tcp connection is closed without properly closing the imap session first (LOGOUT), the server discards certain attributes, specifically, it "forgets" all deletions since last logout. Since many imap clients just tear down the connection in certain cases (for example Thunderbird going into offline mode, many webmailers or stunnel reaching it's "TIMEOUTidle"), this causes mails to be undeleted. We currently use an older version of the mailserver, since only the newest is broken. Needless to say, this does not go well with our users. A fixed version of the imap server may never come, so, until we can switch all users to a new mail system: Is it possible to use stunnel to send an additional imap command before closing the tcp connection (something like "999 LOGOUT")? The command should be sent no matter why the connection is closed, either because the client closed it, a timeout is reached or stunnel is unloaded. If the connection is already cleanly logged out, this doesn't matter, in all other situations it would help. Would it be possible to send such a command, or could this be added as a new feature? Greetings Markus Borst -- ==== Achtung! Umzug: neuer Raum: ==== TU Darmstadt Hochschulrechenzentrum (HRZ) Markus Borst S4/14/2.4.06 Adresse: Mornewegstr. 30 64293 Darmstadt Tel.: 06151/16-2056 Email: M.Borst(a)hrz.tu-darmstadt.de

2 1

SIP encryption with stunnel
by margot.basa 16 Aug '11

16 Aug '11

Hello all, I would like to know if stunnel is able to encrypt a SIP message (UDP or TCP => TLS...) For example: Terminal A can send/receive SIP messages on transport layer UDP or TCP but not TLS. Server B can send/receive SIP messages only in TLS. If terminal A sends a SIP REGISTER message to Server B, does stunnel is able to intercept the message and transform it ? port 5060 => port 5061 TCP => TLS sip uri => sips uri Do you think it's possible with stunnel ? Thank you very much for your input. Regards Une messagerie gratuite, garantie à vie et des services en plus, ça vous tente ? Je crée ma boîte mail www.laposte.net

1 0

Stunnel and CryptoAPI
by ratmahat＠hush.ai 15 Aug '11

15 Aug '11

Hello everyone! I have an interesting question, which i didn't find any answer to after several searches. 1. What if I want to enable client verification with client certificate provided by smart card? Is it possible? 2. Does stunnel has the capability to access Windows certificate store in order to verificate the client certificate with the CA in the store? If anyone ever dealt with this, I'd really appreciate this. Thanks, Rat.

1 0

Odd stunnel problem
by Tristan Schmelcher 09 Aug '11

09 Aug '11

My company uses stunnel on a telecom product and we have run into a strange problem. One of our customers sees an issue every couple weeks where the stunnel process becomes busted. Attempts to establish a connection through stunnel to any host hang indefinitely. Interface stats indicate that stunnel sends and receives a flurry of packets--as if a TLS connection was successfully established--but the local plaintext socket connection to stunnel never passes data. For example, if attempting to run telnet over stunnel, the telnet client just sits there and doesn't write anything to the terminal. During this time the network is otherwise functioning fine. Unfortunately nothing is logged by stunnel when this happens and we haven't been able to reproduce the problem in a controlled environment. Does anyone have any ideas what might be happening? We currently use stunnel 4.35 with debug = warning, sslVersion = TLSv1, and verify = 2.

2 2

stunnel for android
by dddfr 09 Aug '11

09 Aug '11

Hi, I want to use stunnel server in Android Phone ,I don't know how to use it,can you tell me? Thanks! 2011-08-10 dddfr

1 0

doubts with stunnel.conf
by Gabriel Monnerat 09 Aug '11

09 Aug '11

Hello, I am noob in stunnel and I trying configure my environment but I have one problem. My stunnel.conf is: foreground = yes output = /srv/slapgrid/slappart1/var/log/stunnel.log pid = /srv/slapgrid/slappart1/var/run/stunnel.pid syslog = no debug = 7 foreground = yes delay = yes client = yes socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 key = /srv/slapgrid/slappart1/srv/ca/private/mykey.key cert = /srv/slapgrid/slappart1/srv/ca/certs/mycert.crt [varnish_SOFTINST-51] accept = 10.0.235.44:26012 connect = [2a01:e34:ec03:*:*:*:*:*]:15000 In the stunnel compilation the option "--enable-ipv6" was used. And ipv6 address is one zope server to connect using https I have this traceback: 2011.08.09 00:19:51 LOG7[12724:140272018274048]: local socket: FD=7 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.08.09 00:19:51 LOG7[12724:140272018274048]: Service varnish_SOFTINST-51 accepted FD=7 from 10.0.235.44:39673 2011.08.09 00:19:51 LOG7[12724:140272018409232]: Service varnish_SOFTINST-51 started 2011.08.09 00:19:51 LOG7[12724:140272018409232]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2011.08.09 00:19:51 LOG5[12724:140272018409232]: Service varnish_SOFTINST-51 accepted connection from 10.0.235.44:39673 2011.08.09 00:19:59 LOG3[12724:140272018409232]: Error resolving '[2a01:e34:ec03:*:*:*:*:*]': Neither nodename nor servname known (EAI_NONAME) 2011.08.09 00:19:59 LOG3[12724:140272018409232]: No host resolved 2011.08.09 00:19:59 LOG5[12724:140272018409232]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2011.08.09 00:19:59 LOG7[12724:140272018409232]: Service varnish_SOFTINST-51 finished (0 left) 2011.08.09 00:19:59 LOG7[12724:140272018409232]: str_stats: 0 block(s), 0 byte(s) 2011.08.09 00:20:09 LOG7[12724:140272018274048]: local socket: FD=7 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.08.09 00:20:09 LOG7[12724:140272018274048]: Service varnish_SOFTINST-51 accepted FD=7 from 10.0.235.44:39675 2011.08.09 00:20:09 LOG7[12724:140272018409232]: Service varnish_SOFTINST-51 started 2011.08.09 00:20:09 LOG7[12724:140272018409232]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2011.08.09 00:20:09 LOG5[12724:140272018409232]: Service varnish_SOFTINST-51 accepted connection from 10.0.235.44:39675 2011.08.09 00:20:14 LOG7[12724:140272018274048]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2011.08.09 00:20:14 LOG5[12724:140272018274048]: Received signal 15; terminating 2011.08.09 00:20:14 LOG7[12724:140272018274048]: str_stats: 0 block(s), 0 byte(s) 2011.08.09 00:20:14 LOG7[12724:140272018274048]: removing pid file /srv/slapgrid/slappart1/var/run/stunnel.pid Please, someone can help me? maybe I am doing stupid things.. thanks in advance -- Gabriel M. Monnerat

2 3

Stunnel 4.41 dies after a while
by René Plattner 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Hi, I have compiled version 4.41 with xforwarded-for patch successfully for our webmail system (Stunnel <-> Haproxy <-> Horde Webmail). After a while the stunnel daemon dies and following message appears in log: Aug 8 12:05:06 vlb2 [local3.err] stunnel: LOG3[3231:3085343632]: SSL_accept: 140760FC: error:140760FC:SSL routines: SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol Any ideas/suggestions? OS: Centos 5.5 openssl: 0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7 Configuration: ; Protocol version (all, SSLv2, SSLv3, TLSv1) sslVersion = all ; Disable SSLv2 options = NO_SSLv2 ; List of allowed Ciphers ciphers = ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!EXP:!MD5:@STRENGTH ; Disable FIPS fips = no ; Some security enhancements for UNIX systems - comment them out on Win32 setuid = nobody setgid = nobody chroot = /usr/local/var/lib/stunnel/ ; PID is created inside chroot jail pid = /stunnel-webmail.pid ; Some performance tunings socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 ; Option for Dummy MSIE TIMEOUTclose=0 ; Option for errorness SSL implementation options = DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS ; Some debugging stuff useful for troubleshooting debug = local3.4 ; Run as Daemon foreground = no ; Service-level configuration [https] cert = z1.pem accept = ip1:443 connect = p1 xforwardedfor = yes [https] cert = z2.pem accept = ip2:443 connect = p2 xforwardedfor = yes [wmt] cert = z3.pem accept = ip3:443 connect = p3 xforwardedfor = yes regards René Plattner

1 0

Tray icon options
by Sebastian Rose-Indorf 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Hello, many thanks for the new Stunnel versions! I have installed 4.42b3 manually (Vista SP2 64 bit). The tray icon options "Edit stunnel.conf" and "Reload stunnel.conf" do not find the conf file, and the option "Manual" has no effect. At program start Stunnel finds the Conf file without problems (start link: "drive1/path1/stunnel.exe drive2/path2/stunnel.conf"). Greetings seb

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] webmail compose page get expire and logout
by jayesh.shinde 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Hi Ludolf , Sorry for my previous typing mistake , There is *no* firewall rules between any of my 3 servers My problem is when I open webmail with https:// and compose any email and click on send button then page is getting expire and I am getting logout. Kindly note that my other webmail pages with https:// are working properly. Where as with http:// the compose email and send works properly without any problem. That is if I open the webmail vai stunnel https config then only problem comes. So I am searching solution and config option with the same. Let me know if any config info require from my end. I am checking out with the option which you have suggested and will reply you shortly. Regards Jayesh Shinde On 08/08/2011 01:02 PM, Ludolf Holzheid wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-08 12:30:03 +0530, jayesh.shinde wrote: >> > >> > [..] >> > >> > I checked by defining the TIMEOUTs but I am not able to figure out why >> > the page is getting expire and I am getting logout ? >> > There is firewall rule between any servers. > I didn't fully understand your problem, but if your secured tunnel > crosses a stateful firewall (e.g. a NAT router), you might try to > switch on TCP keepalive: > > socket = l:SO_KEEPALIVE=1 > > You might also play with the TCP_KEEP* socket options. > > HTH, > > Ludolf > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------- > Ludolf Holzheid Tel: +49 621 339960 Bihl+Wiedemann GmbH Fax: +49 621 > 3392239 Floßwörthstraße 41 e-mail: lholzheid(a)bihl-wiedemann.de D-68199 > Mannheim, Germany > ---------------------------------------------------------------

1 1

webmail compose page get expire and logout
by jayesh.shinde 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Dear All , I am trying to setup a load balancing under webmail on my test servers. Here is my setup details :-- Total server are 3 servers. i.e ( 2 backend webmail server and 1 front server ) On one server I have installed haproxy-1.4.15.tar.gz + stunnel-4.41.tar.gz with http:// and https:// Another two servers are installed with squirrelmail . my problem:-- ========== 1) When I access the webmail by https://webmail.domain.com and compose any email and click on send button , the page is getting expire and I am getting log out from webmail. In Firefox there is no error on browser , where as in internet explorer I am getting below error with popup window :-- *Error Popup* :-- ============ "do you want to view only the webpage content that was deliver securely. This webpage contain the content that will not be delivered using the secure HTTPS connection, which could compromise the security of entire webpage." Where as if I check with http://webmail.domain.com , then the mail compose and send work properly. Here is the stunnel.conf :-- =================== [root@jayesh ~]# cat /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf cert=/opt/ssl/ssl.key/mail_domain_com.crt key=/opt/ssl/ssl.key/domain.key setuid=stunnel setgid=stunnel pid=/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid output = /var/log/stunnel.log debug = 7 socket=l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket=r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [https] accept=192.168.30.200:443 connect=192.168.30.200:81 TIMEOUTclose = 0 session = 600 TIMEOUTbusy = 600 TIMEOUTclose = 300 TIMEOUTconnect = 600 I checked by defining the TIMEOUTs but I am not able to figure out why the page is getting expire and I am getting logout ? There is firewall rule between any servers. Please suggest me and guide on this issue. I am stuck here. Regards Jayesh Shinde

1 0

anyone got a port for android?
by Jason Haar 05 Aug '11

05 Aug '11

Hi there Exchange email doesn't work on Android for us because we have a requirement for using client certs to protect the ActiveSync over HTTPS transactions. If I had stunnel, I could sync with localhost and stunnel could do the client cert-foo.... So does anyone know of a working stunnel implementation for Android (or even something else that does the same job?) Thanks -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1

3 2

FreeBSD upgrading to 4.41 (Dispatching signals from the signal pipe)
by Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas 04 Aug '11

04 Aug '11

Hi, I just upgrade stunner on a FreeBSD server from 4.35 to 4.41 using the ports, I restarted the server and notice that stunnel was not listen to any port, I had to manually restart it so it could work again. I increased the debug to 7 and got this when booting: 2011.08.04 17:44:58 LOG7[1123:675287360]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2011.08.04 17:44:58 LOG5[1123:675287360]: Received signal 15; terminating 2011.08.04 17:44:58 LOG7[1123:675287360]: str_stats: 0 block(s), 0 byte(s) 2011.08.04 17:44:58 LOG7[1123:675287360]: removing pid file /stunnel.pid 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: No limit detected for the number of clients 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: signal_pipe: FD=3 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: signal_pipe: FD=4 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG5[682:675287360]: stunnel 4.41 on i386-portbld-freebsd8.2 platform 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG5[682:675287360]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.0d 8 Feb 2011 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG5[682:675287360]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Auth:LIBWRAP Sockets:POLL,IPv4 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG5[682:675287360]: Reading configuration from file /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: PRNG seeded successfully 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG6[682:675287360]: Initializing SSL context for service ssmtp 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Certificate: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/smtp.inbox.pem 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Certificate loaded 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Key file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/smtp.inbox.pem 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Private key loaded 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Could not load DH parameters from /usr/local/etc/stunnel/smtp.inbox.pem 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Using hardcoded DH parameters 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: DH initialized with 2048-bit key 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: ECDH initialized with curve prime256v1 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: SSL options set: 0x00000004 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG6[682:675287360]: SSL context initialized 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG6[682:675287360]: Initializing SSL context for service ssmtp2 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Certificate: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/smtp.inbox.pem 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Certificate loaded 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Key file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/smtp.inbox.pem 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Private key loaded 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Could not load DH parameters from /usr/local/etc/stunnel/smtp.inbox.pem 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Using hardcoded DH parameters 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: DH initialized with 2048-bit key 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: ECDH initialized with curve prime256v1 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: SSL options set: 0x00000004 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG6[682:675287360]: SSL context initialized 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG5[682:675287360]: Configuration successful 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=5 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=6 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=6 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=7 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=7 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=8 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=8 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=9 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=9 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: libwrap_init: FD=10 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: accept socket: FD=11 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Service ssmtp bound to 0.0.0.0:465 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Service ssmtp opened FD=11 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: accept socket: FD=12 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Service ssmtp2 bound to 0.0.0.0:587 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[682:675287360]: Service ssmtp2 opened FD=12 2011.08.04 17:45:29 LOG7[688:675287360]: Created pid file /stunnel.pid 2011.08.04 17:45:42 LOG7[688:675287360]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2011.08.04 17:45:42 LOG7[688:675287360]: Service ssmtp closed FD=11 2011.08.04 17:45:42 LOG7[688:675287360]: Service ssmtp2 closed FD=12 This is my conf: cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/smtp.inbox.pem chroot = /usr/local/var/stunnel setuid = stunnel setgid = stunnel pid = /stunnel.pid debug = 7 output = /stunnel.log client = no foreground = no ; Some performance tuning socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [ssmtp] accept = 465 connect = 25 [ssmtp2] accept = 587 connect = 25 Any ideas of what could it be wrong? the last 2 lines of the boot log tell me that the ports i specify are been closed but why? 2011.08.04 17:45:42 LOG7[688:675287360]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2011.08.04 17:45:42 LOG7[688:675287360]: Service ssmtp closed FD=11 2011.08.04 17:45:42 LOG7[688:675287360]: Service ssmtp2 closed FD=12 thanks in advance. regards

2 1

(no subject)
by Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas 04 Aug '11

04 Aug '11

1 0

STunnel NTLM Proxy problem
by Subhash Sharma 04 Aug '11

04 Aug '11

Has anyone use Stunnel to works with NTLM proxy? I am using Stunnel 4.35 on window It works fine straught and basic proxy but fails to use NTLM proxy. My config for NTLM is like this ---------------- configuration --------------------- [https] accept = someport connect = proxy:proxy_port protocol = connect protocolAuthentication = NTLM protocolHost = dest:dest_port protocolUsername = domain\username protocolPassword = password ----------------------------------------------------- I checked the traffic using the win shark -----------------win shark for stunnel ----------------- CONNECT dest:destport HTTP/1.1 , NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: \domain\username Proxy-Authorization: NTLM some long string NTLM Secure Service Provider NTLMSSP identifier: NTLMSSP NTLM Message Type: NTLMSSP_AUTH (0x00000003) Lan Manager Response: Empty NTLM Response: 951842e95a3e1a0001d8ac6fb2980a004b82ffa75232795d … Domain name: NULL User name: domain\username … ------------------------------------------------------ STunnel is not sending the domain and sends the user name consisting of domain and username. When IE is configured to use NLM proxy, traffic is as -------------- win shark for IE ----------------------------- CONNECT dest:destport HTTP/1.1 , NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: domain\username Proxy-Authorization: NTLM some long string NTLM Secure Service Provider NTLMSSP identifier: NTLMSSP NTLM Message Type: NTLMSSP_AUTH (0x00000003) Lan Manager Response: 10f2d8147a2651de00000000000000000000000000000000 … NTLM Response: 951842e95a3e1a0001d8ac6fb2980a004b82ffa75232795d … Domain name: domain … User name: username .. Host name: host -------------------------------------------------------------- ---- stunnel log --------------- 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: Service https started 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG5[2384:5480]: Service https accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:9913 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: remote socket: FD=1456 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG6[2384:5480]: connect_blocking: connecting 172.23.11.161:8080 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait 172.23.11.161:8080: waiting 10 seconds 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG5[2384:5480]: connect_blocking: connected 172.23.11.161:8080 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG5[2384:5480]: Service https connected remote server from 172.23.11.45:9914 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: Remote FD=1456 initialized 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG5[2384:5480]: Negotiations for connect (client side) started 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> CONNECT 172.23.11.35:443 HTTP/1.1 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> Host: 172.23.11.35:443 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> Proxy-Connection: keep-alive 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> Proxy-Authorization: NTLM TlRMTVNTUAABAAAAAgIAAA== 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- HTTP/1.1 407 Proxy Authentication Required 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- Server: FreeProxy/4.50 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:11:16 GMT 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- Content-Type: text/html 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- Transfer-Encoding: Chunked 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- Proxy-Authenticate: NTLM TlRMTVNTUAACAAAAAAAAADgAAAACAgACATR6TVahgFIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4AAAABQLODgAAAA8= 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> CONNECT 172.23.11.35:443 HTTP/1.1 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> Host: 172.23.11.35:443 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> Proxy-Authorization: NTLM TlRMTVNTUAADAAAAAAAAAGwAAAAYABgAQAAAAAAAAABsAAAAFAAUAFgAA......1jDUOrcoBBus0aPbH44onfcpGZvdW5kc3RvbmVccHN5cy1udGxt 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: -> 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- 7E5 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG3[2384:5480]: CONNECT request rejected 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- <html> 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: <- 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG5[2384:5480]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: Service https finished (0 left) 2011.08.04 10:11:16 LOG7[2384:5480]: str_stats: 0 block(s), 0 byte(s) -------------------------------- Please help!!! Subhash Sharma

1 0

silent install of windows stunnel
by Laurent Licour 04 Aug '11

04 Aug '11

stunnel use NSIS as installer and it is possible to use /S switch to run silent install However, even in this mode, openssl configuration tools is executed and prompt for certificate informations. I think that executign this tools should be skip in silent mode -- Laurent LICOUR

2 2

stunnel OK without "transparent = source", with = timeout problem
by Elodie BOSSIER 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

Greetings again, Thanks so much to have updated the manual about SNI, my stunel works correctly. But i have a tiny problem, when i visit my webserver, the SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] with PHP isn't the ip adress of the visitor but the IP of the stunnel. I have read the manual about this transparent proxy and i don't sucess with the configuration. This is my config file : pid = /stunnel.pid options = NO_SSLv2 transparent = source [virtual] accept = 443 cert = /usr/local/openssl/etc/CERTIFICATES/www.franceserv.fr_cert.cert key = /usr/local/openssl/etc/PRIVATE_KEYS/www.franceserv.fr_key.pem connect = www.franceserv.fr:80 [sni1] sni = virtual:elodie.franceserv.com cert = /etc/ssl-fsh/cert-elodie.franceserv.com.pem key = /etc/ssl-fsh/key-franceserv.key connect = elodie.franceserv.com:80 [sni2] sni = virtual:befun.franceserv.com cert = /etc/ssl-fsh/cert-befun.franceserv.com.pem key = /etc/ssl-fsh/key-franceserv.key connect = befun.franceserv.com:80 It's don't work, i have a timeout with my browser. With iptables, i have set this : iptables -t mangle -N DIVERT iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m socket -j DIVERT iptables -t mangle -A DIVERT -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A DIVERT -j ACCEPT ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip route add local 0.0.0.0/0 dev lo table 100 echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/lo/rp_filter echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward My stunnel is on the server 192.168.0.20 and the webserver on 192.168.0.2 I try to follow the help of http://www.stunnel.org/static/stunnel.html#service_level_options with : transparent = none | source | destination | both (Unix only) Could you tell me what i make wrong please ?

2 4

Failed to run 2 instances of windows service (error 1053)
by Laurent Licour 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

I have to run at the same time on the same windows host, 2 instances of stunnel : a client instance and a server instance I have 2 config files : stunnel-client.conf , stunnel-server.conf Each configuration works, but not at the same time. I can install 2 services (with differents service name), but i can't start both services at the same time. I have to stop the first one to start the second one stunnel.exe -install stunnel-client.conf stunnel.exe -install stunnel-server.conf stunnel.exe -start stunnel-client.conf stunnel.exe -start stunnel-server.conf --> error 1053 stunnel.exe -stop stunnel-client.conf stunnel.exe -start stunnel-server.conf stunnel.exe -start stunnel-client.conf --> error 1053 It is also not possible to start the both configurations directly (no service mode). test run with stunnel 4.42b2 on windows XPe and Win2008R2 -- Laurent LICOUR

2 1

Failed to run 2 instances of windows service (error 1053)
by Laurent Licour 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

I have to run at the same time on the same windows host, 2 instances of stunnel : a client instance and a server instance I have 2 config files : stunnel-client.conf , stunnel-server.conf Each configuration works, but not at the same time. I can install 2 services (with differents service name), but i can't start both services at the same time. I have to stop the first one to start the second one stunnel.exe -install stunnel-client.conf stunnel.exe -install stunnel-server.conf stunnel.exe -start stunnel-client.conf stunnel.exe -start stunnel-server.conf --> error 1053 stunnel.exe -stop stunnel-client.conf stunnel.exe -start stunnel-server.conf stunnel.exe -start stunnel-client.conf --> error 1053 It is also not possible to start the both configurations directly (no service mode). test run with stunnel 4.42b2 on windows XPe and Win2008R2 -- Laurent LICOUR

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel on the same machine
by subrata＠indiatimes.com 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

The configuration files are : pid = /var/stunnel.pid ;chroot = /var/lib/stunnel setuid = nobody setgid = nobody foreground =yes ; Use it for client mode client = yes ; Service-level configuration [pop3s] accept = 995 connect = 110 [imaps] accept = 993 connect = 143 [ssmtp] accept = 465 connect = 25 [mysqls] accept = 3307 connect = 192.168.1.6:3307 On 192.168.1.6 ---------------------- pid = /var/stunnel.pid setuid =nobody setgid = nobody foreground = yes client = no ; Service-level configuration [pop3s] accept = 995 connect = 110 [imaps] accept = 993 connect = 143 [ssmtp] accept = 465 connect = 25 [mysqls] accept =3307 connect =3306 connecting like /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysql -h 127.0.0.1 -u root -p -P 3307 Enter password: On entring password the following lines appear : ERROR 2013 (HY000): Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 104 Subrata ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Hatch <bri(a)stunnel.org> To: subrata(a)indiatimes.com Sent: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:02:17 +0530 (IST) Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel on the same machine Near 2007-10-05 22:17 +0530, subrata(a)indiatimes.com insisted: > After starting stunnel and connecting the mysql client/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysql -h 127.0.0.1 -u root -p the flow gets stuck at the Enter password prompt any suggestions how to proceed from there. What do your stunnel configuration files look like? Other problem: mysql client may decide to use a local domain socket when connecting to localhost, thwarting your attempts to go via Stunnel. You might want to 'strace mysql ...' and look for the connect() lines. -- Brian Hatch Time flies like an Systems and arrow. Fruit flies Security Engineer like a banana. http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ Every message PGP signed -- My life has changed. What about yours? Log on to the new Indiatimes Mail and Live out of the Inbox!

3 3

DH parameters
by yyy 30 Jul '11

30 Jul '11

Hello! How to specify custom DH parameters? There is an option for specifying ECDH curve (curve option), but not for ordinary DH. Searching man page for "DH" did not yield anything. Searching this list archive for "DH paramaeters" found only some default error messages.

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Problem with SNI "Specified option name is not valid here"
by Michal Trojnara 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

I wrote: > AFAIR SNI is supported in OpenSSL 1.0.0 and later. I will confirm it > and I will update the manual page if needed. I updated the manual: http://www.stunnel.org/static/stunnel.html Mike

1 0

stunnel 4.41 released
by Michal Trojnara 25 Jul '11

25 Jul '11

Dear Users, I have released version 4.41 of stunnel. This is a bugfix release. I highly recommend Windows users to upgrade. The ChangeLog entry: Version 4.41, 2011.07.25, urgency: MEDIUM: * Bugfixes - Fixed Windows service crash of stunnel 4.40. Home page: http://www.stunnel.org/ Download: ftp://ftp.stunnel.org/stunnel/ SHA-256 hash for stunnel-4.41.tar.gz: 08e0e7df42bfb8b8551eb6c4b5b50eae6051aaf75077101d729e67c7a3a00c72 Best regards, Mike

1 0

Issue with -quiet option (Windows 2000 Server SP4)
by rtr purchase 25 Jul '11

25 Jul '11

Hello, Thank you for STunnel. I've been using BLAT command line mailer for years at a client's site to send system status messages to me. Recently the client switched to ATT's SSL protected email. Blat does not support SSL. STunnel to the rescue. I started with ver. 4.39. I wanted to start and stop the STUNNEL service via script commands but found that the -quiet switch did not suppress the OK message box consistently. This naturally stopped the script from continuing. This was true of both the -start and -stop functions but was more of an issue with the -stop function. While looking through the documentation to see what I might be doing wrong, I saw that 4.40 was released (the day after I downloaded 4.39). 4.40 has the same issue with the -quiet switch but the addition of the -exit switch allowed me to start and stop STUNNEL without running it as a service. Great timing! I had tested my scripts using a Windows 7 machine where they functioned as expected. It was only when I moved them to the client's Windows 2000 Server (SP4) that this issue appeared.

1 0

Problem with SNI "Specified option name is not valid here"
by Elodie BOSSIER 25 Jul '11

25 Jul '11

Greetings, I try to use SNI with stunnel with following this help : http://answerpot.com/showthread.php?2708344-Server-side+SNI+support but i have this erreor : Line 90: "sni = virtual:elodie.franceserv.com": Specified option name is not valid here My config : stunnel 4.40 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu platform Compiled/running with OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010 A part of my config file : [virtual] accept = 443 cert = /etc/ssl-fsh/cert-www.franceserv.com.pem key = /etc/ssl-fsh/key-franceserv.key connect = www.franceserv.fr:80 [sni1] ; notice that "sni" option is used instead of "accept" sni = virtual:elodie.franceserv.com cert = /etc/ssl-fsh/cert-elodie.franceserv.com.pem key = /etc/ssl-fsh/key-franceserv.key connect = elodie.franceserv.com:80 [sni2] ; notice that "sni" option is used instead of "accept" sni = virtual:befun.franceserv.com cert = /etc/ssl-fsh/cert-befun.franceserv.com.pem key = /etc/ssl-fsh/key-franceserv.key connect = befun.franceserv.com:80 Thanks so much.

1 0

stunnel 4.40 released
by Michal Trojnara 23 Jul '11

23 Jul '11

Dear Users, I have released version 4.40 of stunnel. The ChangeLog entry: Version 4.40, 2011.07.23, urgency: LOW: * New Win32 features - Added a GUI menu to save cached peer certificate chains. - Added "-exit" option to stop stunnel *not* running as a service. This option may be useful for scripts. - Added file version information to stunnel.exe. - A number of other GUI improvements. * Other new features - Hardcoded 2048-bit DH parameters are used as a fallback if DH parameters are not provided in stunnel.pem. - Default "ciphers" value updated to prefer ECDH: "ALL:!SSLv2:!aNULL:!EXP:!LOW:-MEDIUM:RC4:+HIGH". - Default ECDH curve updated to "prime256v1". - Removed support for temporary RSA keys (used in obsolete export ciphers). Home page: http://www.stunnel.org/ Download: ftp://ftp.stunnel.org/stunnel/ SHA-256 hash for stunnel-4.40.tar.gz: 91f32c7654dde0e1cf37ed0d8517e0d0b5985cd30443a9d64cd33d232b5fe9ce Best regards, Mike

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] 4.39 RPM
by Jack Liu 21 Jul '11

21 Jul '11

Thank you so much for making RPMs for me~=D Mr. Jack Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:20:04 -0700 From: josealf(a)rocketmail.com Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] 4.39 RPM To: jackliu92(a)hotmail.com; stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Jack, Take a look at my RPMs for CentOS 5. These follow the same conventions as the official RPMS:- By default log to authpriv instead of daemon facility- sample config file adjusted.- I also set the /etc/init.d/stunnel init script executable Binaries were compiled with gcc 4.4. Should work on similar systems (RHEL 5, Scientific Linux 5, Oracle Linux 5 or later). You should be able to build your own binaries starting from the source rpm. My apologies if posting attachments on this list is not encouraged. Regards,Jose From: Jack Liu <jackliu92(a)hotmail.com> To: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 3:14 AM Subject: [stunnel-users] 4.39 RPM Does anyone have version 4.39 RPM inst package or knows where to download it? Thank you! _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

1 0

misconfiguration of transparent proxy
by Marco Strullato 19 Jul '11

19 Jul '11

Hi all, is there any way to use stunnel to proxy a connection without using encryption? I have an application that is listening on 0.0.0.0:port but which refuses connection if not coming from localhost:port and that application is reachable only with telnet, with no encryption. I have found a possible configuration that is the following: chroot = /var/run/stunnel/ setuid = nobody setgid = nobody pid = /stunnel.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel.log transparent=yes [AppSrv01] accept = 5776 connect = 4776 [AppSrv02] accept = 5777 connect = 4777 but it seems not working: that is the log. 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG5[30375:47349987463360]: stunnel 4.15 on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG5[30375:47349987463360]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG6[30375:47349987463360]: file ulimit = 1024 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG6[30375:47349987463360]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG5[30375:47349987463360]: 500 clients allowed 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: FD 4 in non-blocking mode 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: FD 5 in non-blocking mode 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: FD 6 in non-blocking mode 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: AppSrv01 bound to 0.0.0.0:5776 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: FD 7 in non-blocking mode 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: AppSrv02 bound to 0.0.0.0:5777 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30376:47349987463360]: Created pid file /stunnel.pid 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:47349987463360]: AppSrv01 accepted FD=8 from 10.0.1.11:41922 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:1094314304]: AppSrv01 started 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:1094314304]: FD 8 in non-blocking mode 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:1094314304]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:1094314304]: FD 9 in non-blocking mode 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:1094314304]: FD 10 in non-blocking mode 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:47349987463360]: Cleaning up the signal pipe 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG6[30376:47349987463360]: Child process 30384 finished with code 0 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:1094314304]: Connection from 10.0.1.11:41922 permitted by libwrap 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG5[30376:1094314304]: AppSrv01 connected from 10.0.1.11:41922 2011.07.06 11:08:30 LOG7[30376:1094314304]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2011.07.06 11:08:43 LOG3[30376:1094314304]: SSL_accept: 140760FC: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol 2011.07.06 11:08:43 LOG5[30376:1094314304]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2011.07.06 11:08:43 LOG7[30376:1094314304]: AppSrv01 finished (0 left) and from the standard out I get: 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /home/user/.rnd 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /home/user/.rnd 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG6[30375:47349987463360]: PRNG seeded successfully 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: SSL context initialized for service AppSrv01 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2011.07.06 11:08:20 LOG7[30375:47349987463360]: SSL context initialized for service AppSrv02 What happens connecting with telnet is: Trying 10.0.2.140... Connected to server. Escape character is '^]'. It seems the connection is successful but with tcpdump I see nothing and moreover I see nothing also in the application log. If I type something nothing happens. It seems that the flow is not passed to the destination port. Do you have any hint? Thanks! -- Marco

5 5

stunnel 4.40b1
by Michal Trojnara 17 Jul '11

17 Jul '11

Dear Users, I have just added a new Windows GUI menu to save peer certificate chains. Please to give it a try and let me know if there are any issues, so I can fix them in the final stunnel 4.40: ftp://ftp.stunnel.org/stunnel/stunnel-4.40b1-installer.exe Another useful function would probably be a replacement for Unix c_rehash script. 8-) I also appreciate your comments are suggestions related to the new functionality. Best regards, Mike

1 0

Windows 7 connection to HTTPS server
by Daniel Pierce 10 Jul '11

10 Jul '11

stunnel user group, Thanks Yucong Sun or your help. I have changed the configuration file values to the values that you recommended. I didn't read the documentation careful enough. [https] accept = 3600 connect = partnerlogin.advancedmd.com <https://partnerlogin.advancedmd.com/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.a sp> :443 (stopped and started the windows service to get the new configuration) HOWEVER I'm still not getting stunnel to provide the interface to the https web server. I have a http client software which I have tried both GET and POST calls to https://localhost:3600/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.asp <blocked::https://localhost:3600/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.asp> Every time the interface comes back with the error "The Connection to the Server was Reset while the Page was Loading" So I decided to try the page using a standard web browser (Firefox and IE) thinking that my client software may have a problem. I opened the browser and entered the address https://localhost:3600/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.asp <blocked::https://localhost:3600/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.asp> Got the same results. So I changed the configuration to go to the same web site as gmail with the following configuration. [https] accept = 3600 connect = mail.google.com:443 When I try to open the page with the browser to address https://localhost:3600/mail/?hl=en <blocked::https://localhost:3600/mail/?hl=en&shva=1#inbox> &shva=1#inbox, I get the same error message. NEXT I started WIRESHARK on the network and filtered for packets coming from/to my host computer. When I enter https://localhost:3600/mail/?hl=en <blocked::https://localhost:3600/mail/?hl=en&shva=1#inbox> &shva=1#inbox on the browser. The following details were captured by WIRESHARK. Source Destination Protocol Lenth Info 74.125.225.53 192.168.1.70 TLSV1 107 Application Data Protocol: http 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.53 TCP 54 https [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=54 win=16181 Len=0 74.125.225.53 192.168.1.70 TLSV1 112 Application Data Protocol: http 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.53 TLSV1 81 Encrypted Alert 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.53 TCP 54 60089 > https [FIN, ACK] Seq=28 Ack=112 win=16167 Len=0 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.54 TCP 1484 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.53 TLSv1 316 Application Data 74.125.225.53 192.168.1.70 TCP 60 https > 60089 [FIN, ACK] Seq=112 Ack=29 win=196 len=0 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.53 TCP 54 60089 > https [ACK] Seq=29 Ack=113 win=16167 Len=0 74.125.225.54 192.168.1.70 TCP 60 https > 60113 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1693 win=285 len=0 74.125.225.54 192.168.1.70 TLSV1 457 Application Data Protocol: http 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.54 TCP 54 60113 > https [ACK] Seq=1693 Ack=404 win=16445 Len=0 SO the packets are being sent and returned, but the protocol is erroring out for GOOGLE MAIL. NEXT When I configure the service for the other https web server. https://localhost:3600/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.asp <blocked::https://localhost:3600/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.asp> I get a simular exchange, but more reference to change cipher Spec. and http RST for different ip address Source Destination Protocol Lenth Info 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.54 TCP 66 60840 > https [SYN] 74.125.225.54 192.168.1.70 TCP 66 https > 60840 [SYN, ACK] 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.54 TCP 54 60840 > https [ACK] 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.54 TLSv1 451 client Hello 74.125.225.54 192.168.1.70 TCP 60 https > 60840 [ACK] 74.125.225.54 192.168.1.70 TLSv1 97 change cipher Spec, Encrypted Handshake Message 192.168.1.70 74.125.255.54 TLSv1 162 Application Data 74.125.225.54 192.168.1.70 TCP 60 https > 60840 [ACK] 192.168.1.70 98.137.80.34 TCP 54 60819 > http [RST, ACK] STUNNEL LOG for partnerlogin.advancedmd.com:443 NO OBVIOUS ERRORS 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG7[4960:4568]: No limit detected for the number of clients 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG7[4960:4568]: make_sockets: s_socket#1: FD=144 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG7[4960:4568]: make_sockets: s_socket#2: FD=148 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG7[4960:4568]: make_sockets: s_accept: FD=152 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG5[4960:4568]: stunnel 4.39 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu platform 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG5[4960:4568]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.0d 8 Feb 2011 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG5[4960:4568]: Threading:WIN32 SSL:ENGINE Auth:none Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG5[4960:4568]: Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf 2011.07.08 21:31:21 LOG7[4960:4568]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: PRNG seeded successfully 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Configuration SSL options: 0x01000000 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: SSL options set: 0x01000004 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Certificate: stunnel.pem 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Certificate loaded 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Key file: stunnel.pem 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Private key loaded 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: SSL context initialized for service http 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG5[4960:4568]: Configuration successful 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: accept socket: FD=144 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Service http bound to 0.0.0.0:3600 2011.07.08 21:31:22 LOG7[4960:4568]: Service http opened FD=144 Do I need to have the Public Key Certificate for the remote serve installed in stunnel for it to access the page? I'm trying to find a simple configuration to prove out that the basic stunnel application is working. Any suggestions? Is there something basic that I'm missing? If I send a GET request, I should get a response from the https server that CONNECT is configurred for. Is there a compatibility issue between OpenSSL and https web server? Thanks in advance for the help. Dan

2 3

problem running on Mac OS X
by athir＠nuaimi.com 07 Jul '11

07 Jul '11

Hi there. I've built stunnel on the Mac (including the patch for str.c) and have problem when I run it. Whenever it gets a request on one side (from a browser), I see the following in the log. The weird thing is that when I run stunnel in gdb it works?? 2011.07.05 17:51:00 LOG7[6300:4297842688]: Service https started 2011.07.05 17:51:00 LOG7[6300:4297842688]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2011.07.05 17:51:00 LOG7[6300:4297842688]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2011.07.05 17:51:00 LOG7[6300:4297842688]: Acquired libwrap process #0 2011.07.05 17:51:00 LOG3[6300:4297842688]: Unexpected socket close (read_blocking) 2011.07.05 17:51:00 LOG5[6300:4297842688]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket Any advice would be appreciated. thanks Athir Nuaimi

3 2

Windows 7 connection to HTTPS server
by Daniel Pierce 06 Jul '11

06 Jul '11

stunnel user group, I'm trying to use stunnel to connect to a secure web server to do an XML interface, but I'm having no luck. What am I missing? Environment OS = Windows 7 Ultimate stunnel version = 4.39 (latest release) stunnel installed as service and is running. Windows Firewall = OFF, but have added stunnel to the application list Anti-Virus = ESET, have disabled Web Access Protection Configuration File cert = stunnel.pem options = NO_SSLv2 debug = 7 output = c:\Program files\stunnel\stunnel.log client = yes [https] accept = 3600 connect = <https://partnerlogin.advancedmd.com/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.a sp> https://partnerlogin.advancedmd.com/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.as p ;TIMEOUTclose = 0 Log File 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: No limit detected for the number of clients 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: make_sockets: s_socket#1: FD=136 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: make_sockets: s_socket#2: FD=140 allocated (blocking mode) 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: make_sockets: s_accept: FD=144 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG5[5880:6040]: stunnel 4.39 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu platform 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG5[5880:6040]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.0d 8 Feb 2011 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG5[5880:6040]: Threading:WIN32 SSL:ENGINE Auth:none Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG5[5880:6040]: Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: PRNG seeded successfully 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG3[5880:6040]: Unknown TCP service '//partnerlogin.advancedmd.com/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.asp' 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG6[5880:6040]: Cannot resolve 'https://partnerlogin.advancedmd.com/practicemanager/xmlrpc/processrequest.a sp' - delaying DNS lookup 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Configuration SSL options: 0x01000000 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: SSL options set: 0x01000004 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Certificate: stunnel.pem 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Certificate loaded 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Key file: stunnel.pem 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Private key loaded 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: SSL context initialized for service https 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG5[5880:6040]: Configuration successful 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: accept socket: FD=136 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Service https bound to 0.0.0.0:3600 2011.07.06 16:00:07 LOG7[5880:6040]: Service https opened FD=136 I can open a Firefox browser and the designated URL address resolves, but stunnel cannot resolve it. Do I have the configuration wrong or is Windows 7 blocking the connection? I'm able to send an XML message from by application to 127.0.0.1:3600 and stunnel responds with a successful but EMPTY RESPONSE. Thanks in advance for your help. Dan Pierce Xpert Assist Corp.

2 1

stunnel 4.39 released
by Michal Trojnara 06 Jul '11

06 Jul '11

Dear Users, I have just released version 4.39 of stunnel. This version includes major improvements of the Windows GUI and installer. The ChangeLog entry: Version 4.39, 2011.07.06, urgency: LOW: * New features - New Win32 installer module to build self-signed stunnel.pem. - Added configuration file editing with Windows GUI. - Added log file reopening file editing with Windows GUI. It might be useful to also implement log file rotation. - Improved configuration file reload with Windows GUI. Home page: http://www.stunnel.org/ Download: ftp://ftp.stunnel.org/stunnel/ SHA-256 hash for stunnel-4.39.tar.gz: 972e4c150e3012ba8777f149c858e1e290aeb7ad7976e1551ac1752bc04fb0ed Best regards, Mike

1 0

stunnel 4.38 released
by Michal Trojnara 29 Jun '11

29 Jun '11

Dear Users, I have just released version 4.38 of stunnel. The ChangeLog entry: Version 4.38, 2011.06.28, urgency: MEDIUM: * New features - Server-side SNI implemented (RFC 3546 section 3.1) with a new service-level option "nsi". - "socket" option also accepts "yes" and "no" for flags. - Nagle's algorithm is now disabled by default for improved interactivity. * Bugfixes - A compilation fix was added for OpenSSL version < 1.0.0. - Signal pipe set to non-blocking mode. This bug caused hangs of stunnel features based on signals, e.g. local mode, FORK threading, or configuration file reload on Unix. Win32 platform was not affected. Home page: http://www.stunnel.org/ Download: ftp://ftp.stunnel.org/stunnel/ SHA-256 hash for stunnel-4.38.tar.gz: aa49012195fde4dc3e4bed2bb25283cb40a6e0ad8295a47e730652f611e2268c Best regards, Mike

2 1

STunnel on 443 (ip1) and iis (443) on ip2?
by R. van der Gugten 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

Hi, Is it possible to run STunnel on my server to lisen to IP1 on port 443 And to have IIS listen to IP2 on port 443? Should I make changes in the config file? Thanks, Reinier Current server stunnel file: cert = stunnel.pem key = stunnel.pem ; Some performance tunings socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 ; Authentication stuff verify = 2 CAfile = certs.pem ; Use it for client mode client = no ; Service-level configuration [SQLServer] accept = <<IP1:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>>:443 connect = 127.0.0.1:31433

2 1

Stuunnel Help
by Chris Pershin 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

Hello All, I am new to stunnel and am trying to solve a problem. When I try to start stunnel I get the following log file Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf PRNG seeded successfully Certificate: stunnel.pem Certificate loaded Key file: stunnel.pem Private key loaded SSL context initialized for service pop3s Certificate: stunnel.pem Certificate loaded Key file: stunnel.pem Private key loaded SSL context initialized for service imaps Certificate: stunnel.pem Certificate loaded Key file: stunnel.pem Private key loaded SSL context initialized for service ssmtp Configuration successful No limit detected for the number of clients accept socket: FD=164 allocated (non-blocking mode) Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket Service pop3s bound to 0.0.0.0:110 Service pop3s opened FD=164 accept socket: FD=188 allocated (non-blocking mode) Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket Service imaps bound to 0.0.0.0:143 Service imaps opened FD=188 accept socket: FD=196 allocated (non-blocking mode) Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket Error binding ssmtp to 0.0.0.0:25 bind: No error (0) Server is down My Config file is: cert = stunnel.pem socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 client = yes [pop3s] accept = 110 connect = pop.gmail.com:995 [imaps] accept = 143 connect = imap.gmail.com:993 [ssmtp] accept = 25 connect = smtp.gmail.com:465 Can someone please help me? Thanks Chris

2 1