- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

STunnel / Memory Usage / 4 Second Lag
by Jesse Proudman 16 Nov '10

16 Nov '10

We have an account running on STunnel that has been operating just fine for the last 9 days. This morning, all of a sudden, stunnel memory usage spiked to consume the entire available memory on the machine, and response time went from sub 1 second to 4+ seconds. Nothing has changed in the load balanced service itself, the configuration, or any of the traffic numbers. Restarting stunnel gets us between 5 and 60 seconds of normal response times before spiking in memory and going back to 4 seconds. Has any one seen this before? Thanks - Jesse

1 0

Difficulty to compile with alternate 64 bit openssl libraries
by Philippe A. 12 Nov '10

12 Nov '10

Hello, I am having a problem when I compile stunnel against 64 bit openssl libraries: ./configure --prefix $HOME/tls --with-threads=fork --with-ssl=/opt2/openssl stunnel will end up using default libraries in /lib (which I can't remove from my environment). The workaround we have found is to modify the configure script and to force the LIBS variable to use "lib64" instead of "lib". # Add SSL includes and libraries CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I$ssldir/include" LIBS="$LIBS -L$ssldir/lib64 -lssl -lcrypto" #- <---- Is this a known problem? Is there another way around this without changing the configure script? Thanks!

2 1

Reg:libwrap is not working with stunnel 4.34
by mohan raj 10 Nov '10

10 Nov '10

Hi, I successfully cross compiled the Stunnel version 4.34 with OpenSSL version 1.0.0a for arm-linux.i want to use this stunnel with my own application which will communicate with outer world through LAN or GPRS.currently i am testing stunnel with telnet application.Its working fine.I am able to telnet to arm board through SSL enabled telnet terminal software.Now i want restrict the access.so i used the /etc/hosts/allow and /etc/hosts.deny files with my chrroot directory as "/".but stunnel is not at all cared about libwrap service.its not checking those files.if i give libwrap=yes in stunnel.conf file its says "specified option name is not valid here".i compiled stunnel with the option --enable-libwrap and gave the libwrap lib also through LDFLAGS.here with i attached my stunnel version information file, stunnel .conf file also.i think its due to configuration???still i don`t know what to do???so please guys help me out. Thanks & Regards S.Thiyagarajan.

3 4

Error Reading Certificate File
by Ken Davidson 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Hi, I am trying to update my companies Certificate in STunnel and I'm getting the following error messages: Certificate: pass-web_new.pem Error reading certificate file: pass-web_new.pem error queue: 140DC009 : error:140DC009:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file:PEM lib error queue: 906700D : error:0906700D:PEM routines:PEM_ASN1_read_bio:ASN1 lib error queue: D08303A : error:0D08303A:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_TEMPLATE_NOEXP_D2I:nested asn1 error error queue: D07803A : error:0D07803A:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_ITEM_EX_D2I:nested asn1 error SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file: D0680A8: error:0D0680A8:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_CHECK_TLEN:wrong tag We are currently using STunnel without issue; but my certificate is due to expire November 15th. I submitted my request via a CSR file created with OPENSSL. I've attempted to put the data into the file pointed at in the stunnel.conf file but this error continues to haunt me. My previous key was 256, but when making this key I created a 1024 key and used that for the CSR file. I've also added the Intermediate certificate information to the file. Any information on what could be the problem is greatly appreciated. Version: 4.34 Thanks, Ken

1 0

FD_SETSIZE still an option in stunnel 4.34?
by Saikat Chakrabarti 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Hi, I am having some issues with my server where connections are getting dropped once I hit a hard limit of around 350 connections. This may or may not be an issue with my stunnel configuration, but I ran across some old posts saying that stunnel by default has a hard limit of around 500 connections and, to get around this, to set FD_SETSIZE at compile time (I found this on the troubleshooting page - http://www.stunnel.org/faq/troubleshooting.html) However, one of the release notes recently also had a comment saying 'no more FD_SETSIZE limit!' - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg38373.html. So my questions are: 1) Does FD_SETSIZE still exist in Stunnel 4.34 and could it be a reason why I am seeing a limit on the number of people that can make a connection? I already tried running stunnel after setting ulimit -Hn and ulimit -Sn to 4096, and it did not seem to make a difference. 2) More noobish question - how do I set the FD_SETSIZE at compile time? I saw in the troubleshooting that it said to do "-DFD_SETSIZE=4096" at compile time. Is this something I should be adding in one of the Makefiles? Some more info about my setup: - I am using stunnel as a layer in front of Node.js to secure websockets and HTTP connections. - I'm running stunnel 4.34 - I am running stunnel from a startup script in /etc/init.d - it runs as a daemon process - I run stunnel with no params, but with this config file - http://pastebin.com/3Yr80ma1 - uname -a output: Linux gomockingbird.com 2.6.18.8-linode22 #1 SMP Tue Nov 10 16:12:12 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux - gcc -v output: Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.3 --program-suffix=-4.3 --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-objc-gc --enable-mpfr --enable-targets=all --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=i486-linux-gnu --host=i486-linux-gnu --target=i486-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) - openssl version output: OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 Thanks in advance for any help! -- Saikat

2 3

Many services on the same port (VirtualHost)
by Hugo 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

Hello all! Does anyone knows a way to make many services listening on the same port? I've got one stunnel4 server which allows me to crypt two http servers. The first service bind on port 465 and the second on 470. What I will is to let user access on the port 465 using 2 different ServerNames. Thank you in anticipation, and excuse me for my quite bad english =D

4 3

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel-users Digest, Vol 75, Issue 13
by Hugo 31 Oct '10

31 Oct '10

It's what I wanted to do: redirect the public 443 port on the correct local stunnel "accept:" port or service. I'd set 3 services with 3 different certificates on 3 ports. By eg, my first domain is ssl.example.com and the second admin.example.com. These two records point on the same IP. Stunnel has two services on that, so it binds two ports (!=443) (eg, 7100 and 7200) Is there a way to stunnel (or another program) bind on port 443 and, if user connects on ssl.example.com, forward frames/respond using the service/port 7100, and the same for admin.example.com on 7200? https://ssl.example.com ==> https://ssl.example.com:7100 https://admin.example.com ==>https://admin.example.com:7200 ? Thanks Message: 2 Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:45:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Jon Daley <stunnel(a)jon.limedaley.com> To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Many services on the same port (VirtualHost) Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010301139120.19689(a)orange.limedaley.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Hugo wrote: > Does anyone knows a way to make many services listening on the same port? > I've got one stunnel4 server which allows me to crypt two http servers. > The first service bind on port 465 and the second on 470. > What I will is to let user access on the port 465 using 2 different > ServerNames. I am not sure what you are trying to do. You want clients to connect via https to ports 465 on two different IPs and then stunnel to forward them to the appropriate http daemon? I am not sure if stunnel works in that method - that is the reverse of what I use stunnel for - I connect via an unencrypted connection, and forward via stunnel to an encrypted daemon. And if you are talking about virtually hosting https connections, that will work, as long as the certificate contains both servernames - you can't use two different certificates, because you don't know which certificate to serve until after the connection is encrypted.

2 2

Re: [stunnel-users] Many services on the same port (VirtualHost)
by Hugo 30 Oct '10

30 Oct '10

Thanks for the answer, but it seems I haven't got access to IPTables (my stunnel is on a remote shell service) and I think using a webserver is not a good solution for that case. So does anyone knows a program able to bind on a single port, and redirect requests on another depending on the domain name? Thanks you in anticipation Hugo On 30/10/2010 17:02, Pierre DELAAGE wrote: > Hello, > The answer is simply NO in stunnel, > but yes in Apache. > If you are joining one "http server", hosting many virtual hosts, > it should be "trivial". > I recommend using IP based hosting. > > I guess you want to act as a transparent gateway/proxy to https servers : > there is another way to proceed if you have a linux PC on your network > that can act as a routing/gateway: > with iptables you can do redirection to stunnel and get what you want. > Sorry but it is a little bit complicated to develop more now. > > Hope this helps, > Pierre Delaage > > > Le 30/10/2010 17:12, Hugo a écrit : >> Hello all! >> >> Does anyone knows a way to make many services listening on the same port? >> I've got one stunnel4 server which allows me to crypt two http servers. >> The first service bind on port 465 and the second on 470. >> What I will is to let user access on the port 465 using 2 different >> ServerNames. >> >> Thank you in anticipation, and excuse me for my quite bad english =D >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> stunnel-users mailing list >> stunnel-users(a)mirt.net >> http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users >

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] openssl cross compiling for windows
by Jon Daley 30 Oct '10

30 Oct '10

On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Jon Daley wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Michal Trojnara wrote: >> Jon Daley wrote: >>>> 3. Cross-compile OpenSSL: >>>> ./Configure --cross-compile-prefix=i586-mingw32msvc- mingw shared >>>> zlib-dynamic >>>> make >>> And you end up with 3 dlls in the openssl directory? >> >> Not really. Just 2 of them. Zlib is produced in step 2. > Hrm. I wasn't talking about the zlib1.dll. I meant: > ssleay32.dll, libssl32.dll and libeay32.dll. Maybe I got mixed up the names, > and am using one that I don't need. I thought I put them in one at a time, > and waited for Windows to ask me for them, but I'll check again. Ah, yes. I am dumb. I can compile and run it without problems with just the two *eay32 dlls. And we've finally figured out the other bug, where it works on my computer, and not on someone else's. It has to do with ipv6 support, and it didn't go away even after I ./config --disable-ipv6, which that flag is (mostly?) ignored in the windows builds, due to the dynamic LoadLibrary calls. On one computer, stunnel connects on the ipv6 port, but then when running "telnet localhost 7000", it connects via the ipv4 port, and so fails. If we force stunnel to use ipv4 by using 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost, everything works fine. My guess is that his computer is partially/incorrectly configured for ipv6, and so that is the reason for the failure. I'm planning on removing the LoadLibrary calls to force ipv6 to be off, though it'd be nice to not do that, since someday, there will be an ipv6-only network that we'll have to deal with presumably. -- Jon Daley http://jon.limedaley.com ~~ For many people, one of the most frustrating aspects of life is not being to understand other people's behavior. We see them as "guilty" instead of "innocent." -- Unknown

2 2

Re: [stunnel-users] openssl cross compiling for windows
by Jon Daley 27 Oct '10

27 Oct '10

On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Michal Trojnara wrote: > 1. Install mingw32 tools: > apt-get install mingw32 Yes, I did that. > 2. Cross-compile and install zlib > (see the zlib documentation for details) Yes, I was doing that, but then was leaving it out since I don't need it (AFAIK). > 3. Cross-compile OpenSSL: > ./Configure --cross-compile-prefix=i586-mingw32msvc- mingw shared > zlib-dynamic > make And you end up with 3 dlls in the openssl directory? > 4. Cross-compile stunnel: > cd src > make stunnel.exe I can compile stunnel.exe fine, I just can't run it, because I don't have all three of the dlls. -- Jon Daley http://jon.limedaley.com ~~ If you do a job too well, you will get stuck with it. -- Slous

2 1