23 Aug
2006
23 Aug
'06
9:43 a.m.
Michal Trojnara wrote:
On 2006-08-22, at 10:55, Hans Werner Strube wrote:
Instead of waiting, a better method would be to have a finer timeout resolution than 1 sec in s_poll_wait(...,...); setting the timeout to 1 (sec) would be too embarrassing for TLS connections. But this would require major changes in the sources.
I'm going to do it the hard way and add another parameter to s_poll_wait() function.
IMHO the timeout should be between 100ms and 500ms. What do you think?
I have not tested the minimum required. However, it should be as short as possible, since for a client using TLS, the full delay will always occur on starting a connection. It should be documented somewhere how this new constant could be configured in compilation.