Hi!!
I have installed the version 4.44 of stunnel, haproxy I am currently using 1.4.22. I need to update stunnel most recent version. How do I update stunnel to the latest version?
And I want to know How do I uninstall stunnel?
I hope you can help me, I thank you in advance!
On 10/25/2012 1:04 PM, magali morales wrote:
Hi!!
I have installed the version 4.44 of stunnel, haproxy I am currently using 1.4.22. I need to update stunnel most recent version. How do I update stunnel to the latest version?
And I want to know How do I uninstall stunnel?
I hope you can help me, I thank you in advance!
I
You can't be serious? I am not about to help you figure out such a simple procedure. When you learn to think for yourself, then come back and try again. Adios!
- Mike
Well you don't need to be an asshole about it.
It's notable that the user didn't specify OS, how he installed stunnel in the first place (compile, package manager, etc). Those are key pieces of information.
Beyond that you can recommend the online documentation that prescribes how to do this. If it's compiled there's documentation. If it's from the package manager, the short answer is "it will upgrade when you run updates, but only when your distribution packages a new version" and "use your package manager to uninstall the package."
Instead you waste time being a dickhead on a public mailing list. If you were going to take the time to post an e-mail, why not post something useful instead of throwing a stream of insults?
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Michal Trojnara [email protected] wrote:
On 10/25/2012 1:04 PM, magali morales wrote:
Hi!!
I have installed the version 4.44 of stunnel, haproxy I am currently using 1.4.22. I need to update stunnel most recent version. How do I update stunnel to the latest version?
And I want to know How do I uninstall stunnel?
I hope you can help me, I thank you in advance!
I
You can't be serious? I am not about to help you figure out such a simple procedure. When you learn to think for yourself, then come back and try again. Adios!
- Mike
stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
This is why people are turned off to open source. What a great attitude.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Michal Trojnara [email protected] wrote:
On 10/25/2012 1:04 PM, magali morales wrote:
Hi!!
I have installed the version 4.44 of stunnel, haproxy I am currently using 1.4.22. I need to update stunnel most recent version. How do I update stunnel to the latest version?
And I want to know How do I uninstall stunnel?
I hope you can help me, I thank you in advance!
I
You can't be serious? I am not about to help you figure out such a simple procedure. When you learn to think for yourself, then come back and try again. Adios!
- Mike
stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
At the risk of continuing this useless thread, I would like to point out that the original email did NOT originate from Michael's usual email address.
Anyone that has been on the list for a while would know that such a response from Michael would be highly unlikely.
Trolls happen, the best approach is to ignore them. It's the price of openness, and it's a small price to pay.
Jordan
ps> The upgrade path of stunnel depends on the OS you have it installed on, version, and a few other variables. You can find a lot of information by searching the mailing list, the stunnel website, or just using Google. If still stuck, post the details of your installation back to the list.
On 10/30/2012 11:07 AM, Brian Wilkins wrote:
This is why people are turned off to open source. What a great attitude.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Michal Trojnara <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/25/2012 1:04 PM, magali morales wrote: > Hi!! > > I have installed the version 4.44 of stunnel, haproxy I am currently > using 1.4.22. > I need to update stunnel most recent version. > How do I update stunnel to the latest version? > > And I want to know > How do I uninstall stunnel? > > I hope you can help me, I thank you in advance! > > I You can't be serious? I am not about to help you figure out such a simple procedure. When you learn to think for yourself, then come back and try again. Adios! - Mike [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Jordan K [email protected] wrote:
At the risk of continuing this useless thread, I would like to point out that the original email did NOT originate from Michael's usual email address.
No, no this is useful information. Point still stands, accusation seems misattributed.
I'm not familiar with these people; I can only react to what I see.
On 2012-10-30 00:46, Michal Trojnara wrote:
You can't be serious? I am not about to help you figure out such a simple procedure. When you learn to think for yourself, then come back and try again. Adios!
- Mike
Signing your emails with my name and email address just to start a flame war is really pathetic...
You were clever enough to send the email via TOR, but not enough to subscribe the mailing list via TOR. You used the IP address 132.248.58.97, which belongs to Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Your network administrators should be able to trace this address back to your workstation.
The headers of the original email messsage are:
Return-Path: [email protected] X-Original-To: [email protected] Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from linode.mirt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linode.mirt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E1B1C142; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:25:01 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: [email protected] Delivered-To: [email protected] Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.91.229.3; helo=plane.gmane.org; [email protected]; [email protected] Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linode.mirt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0CB71C0F7 for [email protected]; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:24:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from [email protected]) id 1TTDge-00059g-Ue for [email protected]; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:25:04 +0100 Received: from tor-exit2.conformal.com ([204.124.83.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for [email protected]; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:25:04 +0100 Received: from odalim29 by tor-exit2.conformal.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for [email protected]; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:25:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: [email protected] From: Michal Trojnara [email protected] Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:46:59 -0500 Lines: 26 Message-ID: [email protected] References: CAERzskroDw0ryXeX8MkJ3Y3u2q_rR4EJ+Lf7=5O5J8hMyUm-MA@mail.gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: [email protected] X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tor-exit2.conformal.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 In-Reply-To: CAERzskroDw0ryXeX8MkJ3Y3u2q_rR4EJ+Lf7=5O5J8hMyUm-MA@mail.gmail.com Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] How upgrade stunnel? X-BeenThere: [email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "public, moderate-volume list - general discussion, problem reports, patches" <stunnel-users.stunnel.org> List-Unsubscribe: https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/stunnel-users, mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe List-Archive: http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users List-Post: mailto:[email protected] List-Help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help List-Subscribe: https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users, mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: [email protected] Errors-To: [email protected]
Mike
On 30.10.2012 19:52, Michal Trojnara wrote:
You were clever enough to send the email via TOR, but not enough to subscribe the mailing list via TOR.
He also seems unable to avoid giving the same e-mail address in the faked response:
From: Michal Trojnara [email protected]
that already appeared in the original request:
From: magali morales [email protected]
The latter seems to have actually been sent through Google, sans TOR:
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.83.48; helo=mail-ee0-f48.google.com; [email protected]; [email protected] Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com (mail-ee0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linode.mirt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557541C123 for [email protected]; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:04:18 +0200 (CEST)
You might want to involve the abuse contacts there, too.
Regards, J. Bern
-
Brian Wilkins -
Jochen Bern -
John Moser -
Jordan K -
magali morales -
Michal Trojnara
-
Michal Trojnara