stunnel-users

3 participants
3308 discussions

Connection rejected: too many clients (>=500)?
by Chris Charman 18 Nov '08

18 Nov '08

Hey folks -- Can anyone tell me where the max number of clients is configured in 4.21? I'm running okay for a while, but then I end up with repeated messages as below in the logs: 2008.11.18 19:13:33 LOG7[26491:46912520933328]: https accepted FD=512 from xx.xx.xx.xx:xxxxx 2008.11.18 19:13:33 LOG4[26491:46912520933328]: Connection rejected: too many clients (>=500) 2008.11.18 19:13:33 LOG7[26491:46912520933328]: https accepted FD=512 from xx.xx.xx.xx:xxxxx 2008.11.18 19:13:33 LOG4[26491:46912520933328]: Connection rejected: too many clients (>=500) 2008.11.18 19:13:33 LOG7[26491:46912520933328]: https accepted FD=512 from xx.xx.xx.xx:xxxxx 2008.11.18 19:13:33 LOG4[26491:46912520933328]: Connection rejected: too many clients (>=500) [...] I've only seen reports of this problem, but no solution. Anyone out there who can help? Thanks in advance! -Chris ------------- Config below ----------------- ulimit unlimited stunnel -version stunnel 4.21 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP Global options debug = 5 pid = /var/run/stunnel4.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem ciphers = AES:ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL:+RC4:@STRENGTH key = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem session = 300 seconds sslVersion = SSLv3 for client, all for server TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none uname -a Linux domU-12-31-39-01-61-B2 2.6.21.7-2.fc8xen #1 SMP Fri Feb 15 12:34:28 EST 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux stunnel -sockets Socket option defaults: Option Accept Local Remote OS default SO_DEBUG -- -- -- 0 SO_DONTROUTE -- -- -- 0 SO_KEEPALIVE -- -- -- 0 SO_LINGER -- -- -- 0:0 SO_OOBINLINE -- -- -- 0 SO_RCVBUF -- -- -- 87380 SO_SNDBUF -- -- -- 16384 SO_RCVLOWAT -- -- -- 1 SO_SNDLOWAT -- -- -- 1 SO_RCVTIMEO -- -- -- 0:0 SO_SNDTIMEO -- -- -- 0:0 SO_REUSEADDR 1 -- -- 0 SO_BINDTODEVICE -- -- -- -- IP_TOS -- -- -- 0 IP_TTL -- -- -- 64 TCP_NODELAY -- -- -- 0 gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2 --program-suffix=-4.2 --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-objc-gc --enable-mpfr --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7) openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007

2 2

Re: [stunnel-users] Cannot connect to SBC/yahoo to send (or telnet)
by James Moe 18 Nov '08

18 Nov '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/18/08 10:17 am, James Moe wrote: > Hello, > Stunnel v4.20. > When connecting to SBC/Yahoo, the session is terminated > with a "bad certificate" message. See the log below. The tech folks claim > all is well at their end. > Is there something I am missing here? > Here is the conf file: > My apologies. I lost control of the email program and it sent this message here instead of to a local host. - -- jimoe (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (OS/2) iD8DBQFJIvmqzTcr8Prq0ZMRAsb2AJ9ROwt9FH4GpfyNWQ020rpGmC7K/wCdGhdW Bs96qyJjjXSA9d+AwVktAac= =+UNT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Proxy support
by Reinier van der Gugten 18 Nov '08

18 Nov '08

Oops.. That's exactly what I meant... However What is the correct configuration in that case? E.g. I want to connect to an external location at: Myserver.com:443 The proxy is at: CustomerProxy:8080 And my application runs at the customer talking to: localhost:1433 The proxy does not require authentication. Looking at the docuemtation you linked me I found this example: CONNECT server.example.com:80 HTTP/1.1 Host: server.example.com:80 Proxy-Authorization: basic aGVsbG86d29ybGQ= Using my addresses, where goes what? CONNECT CustomerProxy:8080 HTTP/1.1 Host: Myserver.com:443 // Proxy-Authorization: basic aGVsbG86d29ybGQ= Kind regards, Reinier -----Original Message----- From: stunnel-users-bounces(a)mirt.net [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michal Trojnara Sent: vrijdag 14 november 2008 15:04 To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Proxy support On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:53:20 +0100, "Reinier van der Gugten" <info(a)rgit.eu> wrote: > Has someone got a working version of STunnel that can handle a proxy? Do you mean client mode CONNECT protocol support (RFC 2817 section 5.2)? http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2817.txt It's supported in stunnel since version 4.15 (released 2006.03.11). Best regards, Mike _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)mirt.net http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

1 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Help - Getting stunnel compiled on windows and using a patch
by Reinier van der Gugten 14 Nov '08

14 Nov '08

Thanks so mucht for this information! I had to make the folowing changes as well: Set the Compile with common language runtime to: No common language runtime support for each .h file If I do that, the error: Command line error D8045: cannot compile C file 'src\client.c' with the /clr option disappears (Next I got an error in the resouce.rc file with the LTEXT VERSION... So I // that out) Next I get about 121 errors, like: Error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _main ... symbol _num_clients etc. Any ideas? Kind regards, Reinier ________________________________ From: DMILE525 [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: donderdag 13 november 2008 23:23 To: Reinier van der Gugten Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Help - Getting stunnel compiled on windows and using a patch on Windows: install Win32 OpenSSL http://www.slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html <wlmailhtml:{86BCE398-B6B8-40AD-8A3D-BE759753A203}mid://00000009/!x-usc: http://www.slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html> install VS2008 (I'm using free VS2008 C++ Express Edition http://www.microsoft.com/express/download/ <wlmailhtml:{86BCE398-B6B8-40AD-8A3D-BE759753A203}mid://00000009/!x-usc: http://www.microsoft.com/express/download/> ) The first thing to do (assuming a default installation of 'C:\OpenSSL') is to go to 'C:\OpenSSL\lib\VC' and copy all of the files to your Visual C++ 'lib' directory. This directory is sometimes located in a somewhat cryptic location such as 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\lib' or 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\lib'. Next, copy everything in the 'C:\OpenSSL\include' directory to your Visual C++ 'include' directory. create new empty project add to project: stunnel.c ssl.c ctx.c verify.c file.c client.c protocol.c sthreads.c log.c options.c network.c resolver.c gui.c common.h prototypes.h resources.h stunnel.ico resources.rc "Configuration properties -> Linker -> input -> additional properties" add wsock32.lib ssleay32.lib libeay32.lib "Configuration properties -> General -> character set" set "Use Multi-Byte Character Set" in common.h after #ifndef COMMON_H #define COMMON_H add #define USE_WIN32 #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE #define _CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE //#define HAVE_GETADDRINFO //#define HAVE_GETNAMEINFO #ifndef _MBCS #define _MBCS #endif #define VERSION "4.26" #if defined _M_IX86 #pragma comment(linker, "/manifestdependency:\"type='win32' name='Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls' version='6.0.0.0' processorArchitecture='x86' publicKeyToken='6595b64144ccf1df' language='*'\"") #elif defined _M_IA64 #pragma comment(linker, "/manifestdependency:\"type='win32' name='Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls' version='6.0.0.0' processorArchitecture='ia64' publicKeyToken='6595b64144ccf1df' language='*'\"") #elif defined _M_X64 #pragma comment(linker, "/manifestdependency:\"type='win32' name='Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls' version='6.0.0.0' processorArchitecture='amd64' publicKeyToken='6595b64144ccf1df' language='*'\"") #else #pragma comment(linker, "/manifestdependency:\"type='win32' name='Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls' version='6.0.0.0' processorArchitecture='*' publicKeyToken='6595b64144ccf1df' language='*'\"") #endif On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Reinier van der Gugten <info(a)rgit.eu> wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile STunnel. I'd rather not, but the pre-compiled version does not support a proxy server. So I hop you will be able to help me, or point me to a good howto on how to compile stunnel using windows and a patch from the patch-list. Or does someone have a compiled (windows) version with proxy support? If so, please mail it to me. Or tell me where to find more detailed information pls. - Next thing I will try is to install linux on a computer in order to try it that way... Greetings, Reinier. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)mirt.net http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

2 2

Strange CRL verification behaviour
by Christophe Nanteuil 03 Nov '08

03 Nov '08

With stunnel 4.26 (or ealier), in order to verify revocation of clients' certificates, I use this configuration file : -------------------8<------------------ CAfile=/etc/ssl/stunnel/ca_certs.pem CRLfile=/etc/ssl/stunnel/crl.pem cert=/etc/ssl/stunnel/server.pem key=/etc/ssl/stunnel/server.key sslVersion=TLSv1 verify=2 [WEB] accept=8080 connect=127.0.0.1:3128 ------------------->8------------------ 1/ If there is no CRLfile when stunnel starts, stunnel dies and logs show "Failed to load /etc/ssl/stunnel/crl.pem revocation lookup file" -> ok. 2/ If the CRLfile is correct, stunnel starts. When the CRL expires, stunnel rejects any new connection. Logs then show : " Found CRL is expired - revoking all certificates until you get updated CRL" -> ok 3/ If the CRLfile is not a valid CRL, stunnel starts and ignores the CRLfile. Then, for any new connection, logs show "CRL: verification passed". -> NOT ok, IMO. examples of wrong CRLs : a CRL issued by an unknown CA or a certificate in the PEM format. This can happen when the CRL expires (soon) and the administrator puts a "new one" but misfits files. He then restarts stunnel, which works. This behaviour can be annoying because the logs of CRL are now in level 6 (INFO) and not any more in level 5 (NOTICE). My configuration was in debug=5 and logs showed only "CRL: verification passed", I could not determine what CRL was really used. I propose the attached patch to modify behaviour in case 3/, ie if no CRL corresponding to the issuer of each certificate of the chain is found : - reject connection if CRLdir or CRLfile was specified in the config file - accept connection but warn in logs if the use of CRL was not explicitly set in the config file. NB : the source code of function "crl_check" shows "/* based on BSD-style licensed code of mod_ssl */". I looked into the code of "mod_ssl-2.8.31-1.3.41" (file pkg.sslmod/ssl_engine_kernel.c, line 1601-1769) and there is actually the same behaviour. -- Christophe Nanteuil

1 0

Spawning a shell
by Tobias Dussa 29 Oct '08

29 Oct '08

Hi everybody, maybe I'm missing something real obvious here, but I can't figure out what's going wrong. I'm trying to make stunnel spawn a regular shell when it gets a connect. As far as I understand, the pty option should allocate a virtual tty, so I ought to be able to just exec() a shell. However, this won't work; apparently some more magic is required. I do get the basic interactive functionality to work (i. e., I can enter, say, ls and get back a directory listing), but the terminal won't work properly: Unwanted echoes (stty -echo doesn't help). Furthermore, for some reason stderr is not connected to the new pty but sticks to stunnel's original pty. I have tried spawning a shell directly from stunnel (with exec), spawning a script which redirects stdin/-out/-err to the proper pty, then execs a shell, spawning a script which execs login, spawning a script which execs getty. (The latter being closest to what I want, but not good enough.) I'm running out of ideas. Anyone ever did this? Any comments? (Incidentally, if anyone has a better idea how to create the possibility to log in with an X.509 certificate without using stunnel, I'm all ears.) I'm running stunnel4 on Debian etch: --- stunnel 4.18 on i486-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006 Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP Global options debug = 5 pid = /var/run/stunnel4.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem ciphers = ALL:!ADH:+RC4:@STRENGTH key = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem session = 300 seconds sslVersion = SSLv3 for client, all for server TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none --- Cheers, Toby. -- The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help. ---Ronald Reagan

3 2

Thanks for solving my problem!
by editor 20 Oct '08

20 Oct '08

Hi: Thanks! I commented out the "Verify" option within the configuration file and restarted the application. I can use it POP3S & HTTPS with the Nokia & Sony-Ericsson mobiles fine now as well as Thunderbird. I will check with Outlook next. Window's mobile is complaining it can not create a SSL session however. I think it has to do with the public certificate I use in the mail host. Godaddy uses this two part public certificate and the Network Solutions is a single file. I am hoping in a new release of Stunnel, it can support a two part public certificate. Thanks again!!! Kevin > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:17:29 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Algol Tradent <tradent(a)yahoo.com> > > Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Version 4.26 and using to secure IMAPS & > > POP3 > > To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > > Message-ID: <710279.38955.qm(a)web62003.mail.re1.yahoo.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > Hello, > > > > I think your problem is on your config file for the server. On your config file you have the following option > > > > # Authentication stuff > > verify = 3 > > > > You probably don't want this option set. Because you are asking the client and the server to authenticate each other based on certificates... which I don;t think is the case here. > > > > On your log file there is this line which is a good indicator of your problem. > > > > routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE:peer did not return a certificate > > > > I hope this helps > >

1 0

Version 4.26 and using to secure IMAPS & POP3
by Editor (Kevin) 19 Oct '08

19 Oct '08

Hi: I upgraded to the current 4.26 as I was having an issue with 4.15. The idea is to secure IMAP traffic as well as inbound SMTP. The email client is the latest Thunderbird and seems to be very stable. The mail Host is a Sun E-250 with current patches for Solaris 9. Note: I am using a public certificate and as it from "godaddy.com", it is this unusual two part certificate. This may be where the problem is as I had to combine the two public certificate files together (maybe the next version of STUNNEL could do this automatically so the risk of errors is reduced!). However, using STUNNEL, I am having an issue connecting as I get a strange error message and the connection dies. Error Log: 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:1]: imaps accepted FD=0 from 80.38.96.194:4129 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: imaps started 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: FD 0 in non-blocking mode 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:1]: Cleaning up the signal pipe 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: Acquired libwrap process #0 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:1]: Cleaning up the signal pipe 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: Releasing libwrap process #0 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: Released libwrap process #0 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:1]: Cleaning up the signal pipe 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: imaps permitted by libwrap from 80.38.96.194:4129 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG5[2104:3]: imaps accepted connection from 80.38.96.194:4129 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:1]: Cleaning up the signal pipe 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate A 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate request A 2008.10.19 13:10:41 LOG7[2104:3]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2008.10.19 13:10:42 LOG7[2104:3]: SSL alert (read): warning: no certificate 2008.10.19 13:10:42 LOG7[2104:1]: Cleaning up the signal pipe 2008.10.19 13:10:42 LOG7[2104:3]: SSL alert (write): fatal: handshake failure 2008.10.19 13:10:42 LOG3[2104:3]: SSL_accept: 140890C7: error:140890C7:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE:peer did not return a certificate 2008.10.19 13:10:42 LOG7[2104:1]: Cleaning up the signal pipe 2008.10.19 13:10:42 LOG5[2104:3]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2008.10.19 13:10:42 LOG7[2104:1]: Cleaning up the signal pipe 2008.10.19 13:10:42 LOG7[2104:3]: imaps finished (0 left) See the weird no client peer handshake???? The configuration file: # more /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf # stunnel configuration file # Use to provide ssl protection for https, pop3 and imap # # Setting up the root jail chroot = /usr/local/var/stunnel # # The PID is created inside chroot jail pid = /stunnel.pid setuid = nobody setgid = nogroup ; Some security enhancements for UNIX systems - comment them out on Win32 chroot = /usr/local/var/lib/stunnel/ setuid = nobody setgid = nogroup ; Some performance tunings socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 # Authentication stuff verify = 3 # Certicates to use # cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem CAfile = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/_.cellmail.com.crt # SSLCertificateChainFile = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/gd_intermediate_bundle.crt # Some debugging stuff debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel.log # Use it for client mode #client = yes # Service-level configuration [pop3s] accept = 199.4.110.39:995 connect = 110 [imaps] accept = 199.4.110.39:993 connect = 143 [ssmtp] accept = 199.4.110.39:465 connect = frog.cellmail.com:25 # TIMEOUTclose = 0 The startup log: 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /export/home/kgreene/.rnd 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /export/home/kgreene/.rnd 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Certificate: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Certificate loaded 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Key file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Private key loaded 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Loaded verify certificates from /usr/local/etc/stunnel/_.cellmail.com.crt 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Loaded /usr/local/etc/stunnel/_.cellmail.com.crt revocation lookup file 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: SSL context initialized for service pop3s 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Certificate: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Certificate loaded 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Key file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Private key loaded 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Loaded verify certificates from /usr/local/etc/stunnel/_.cellmail.com.crt 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Loaded /usr/local/etc/stunnel/_.cellmail.com.crt revocation lookup file 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: SSL context initialized for service imaps 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Certificate: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Certificate loaded 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Key file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Private key loaded 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Loaded verify certificates from /usr/local/etc/stunnel/_.cellmail.com.crt 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: Loaded /usr/local/etc/stunnel/_.cellmail.com.crt revocation lookup file 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: SSL context initialized for service ssmtp 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG5[2077:1]: stunnel 4.26 on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 with OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG5[2077:1]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG6[2077:1]: file ulimit = 256 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG6[2077:1]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG5[2077:1]: 125 clients allowed 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: FD 11 in non-blocking mode 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: FD 12 in non-blocking mode 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: FD 13 in non-blocking mode 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: pop3s bound to 199.4.110.39:995 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: FD 14 in non-blocking mode 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: imaps bound to 199.4.110.39:993 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: FD 15 in non-blocking mode 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2077:1]: ssmtp bound to 199.4.110.39:465 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2083:1]: Created pid file /stunnel.pid 2008.10.19 13:02:50 LOG7[2083:1]: Cleaning up the signal pipe

2 1

forgeground=no with pppd and pty=yes?
by Sandeep Kumar 15 Oct '08

15 Oct '08

Hi, I want to encrypt pppd, but stunnel should start in background mode. But as soon as I set foreground=no, ppp is unable to connect. Is this not possible ? -- Sandeep Kumar http://students.iiit.ac.in/~sandeep_kr

1 0

Setting up a POP3 connection through stunnel?
by Ben Stover 13 Oct '08

13 Oct '08

Assume currently I retrieve my emails from my mailbox unencrypted with the following info: pop3.mydomain.com port=110 Now I want to switch to an encrypted POP3 mail connection. with the following information pop3.mydomain.com port=777 Can I simply write now in the conf file: [myownsetup] accept = 127.0.0.1:110 connect = pop3.mydomain.com:777 Is this sufficient? Ben

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users