- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

stunnel is stuck for 30 seconds
by Brent Kimberley 23 Dec '20

23 Dec '20

Chris/Ditty. Have you tried optimizing your config - on both sides? For example, please search for TIMEOUTbusy in https://github.com/mtrojnar/stunnel/tree/stunnel-5.58 &/| https://github.com/mtrojnar/stunnel/tree/stunnel-5.57 On 12/21/20 13:09, dittyadler(a)gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running stunnel version 5.58 on Windows, > everything works perfectly besides that sometimes stunnel gets stuck for 30 seconds - > Nothing special in stunnel log, except for the 30 seconds delay: >

1 0

stunnel is stuck for 30 seconds
by dittyadler＠gmail.com 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Hi, I'm running stunnel version 5.58 on Windows, everything works perfectly besides that sometimes stunnel gets stuck for 30 seconds - Nothing special in stunnel log, except for the 30 seconds delay: 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: TLS connected: previous session reused 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: TLSv1.3 ciphersuite: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit encryption) 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: Peer temporary key: X25519, 253 bits 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: Session id: 8E62D0D8EB6359FEA7370E64AA7CC58EF9DB68059A5E01417E7038B773CE60D3 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: TLS state (connect): SSL negotiation finished successfully 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: TLS state (connect): SSL negotiation finished successfully 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: Initializing application specific data for session authenticated 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: New session callback 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: Session id: AF8ED185555C6734403C71B514A3F6B75F8484A5AC4EAE6058CFF4D35D929B36 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server session ticket 30 sec delay 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[8]: Read socket closed (readsocket) 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: Sending close_notify alert 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: TLS alert (write): warning: close notify 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[8]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG3[8]: transfer: s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: FD=4540 ifds=--x ofds=--- 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: FD=4792 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG5[8]: Connection closed: 64 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: Remote descriptor (FD=4792) closed 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: Local descriptor (FD=4540) closed 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: Service [SLNP pem file] finished (0 left) log example when stunnel doesn't get stuck: 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: TLS connected: previous session reused 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: TLSv1.3 ciphersuite: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit encryption) 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: Peer temporary key: X25519, 253 bits 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: Session id: AF8ED185555C6734403C71B514A3F6B75F8484A5AC4EAE6058CFF4D35D929B36 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: TLS state (connect): SSL negotiation finished successfully 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: TLS state (connect): SSL negotiation finished successfully 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Initializing application specific data for session authenticated 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: New session callback 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: Session id: 44E9010787EFDBC0FCA92724415AD30EF9EDB626D734D894061606C79CD26402 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server session ticket 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: Read socket closed (readsocket) 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Sending close_notify alert 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: TLS alert (write): warning: close notify 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG3[9]: transfer: s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: FD=2464 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: FD=2788 ifds=--x ofds=--- 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG5[9]: Connection closed: 64 byte(s) sent to TLS, 108 byte(s) sent to socket 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Remote descriptor (FD=2464) closed 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Local descriptor (FD=2788) closed 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Service [SLNP pem file] finished (0 left) My stunnel conf: debug = 7 output = stunnel.log fips = no options = NO_SSLv2 [SLNP pem file] key = SLNP_urmsand01_new.pem cert = SLNP_urmsand01_new.pem client = yes accept = 8003 connect = host:6443 TIMEOUTbusy = 30 TIMEOUTclose = 0 TIMEOUTconnect = 60 TIMEOUTidle = 86400 With the old stunnel(5.14) it doesn’t happen. Thanks, Ditty.

1 0

stunnel is stuck for 30 seconds
by DITTY ADLER 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

Hi, I'm running stunnel version 5.58 on Windows, everything works perfectly besides that sometimes stunnel gets stuck for 30 seconds - Nothing special in stunnel log, except for the 30 seconds delay: 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: TLS connected: previous session reused 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: TLSv1.3 ciphersuite: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit encryption) 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: Peer temporary key: X25519, 253 bits 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: Session id: 8E62D0D8EB6359FEA7370E64AA7CC58EF9DB68059A5E01417E7038B773CE60D3 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: TLS state (connect): SSL negotiation finished successfully 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: TLS state (connect): SSL negotiation finished successfully 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: Initializing application specific data for session authenticated 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: New session callback 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG6[8]: Session id: AF8ED185555C6734403C71B514A3F6B75F8484A5AC4EAE6058CFF4D35D929B36 2020.12.21 14:48:36 LOG7[8]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server session ticket 30 sec delay 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[8]: Read socket closed (readsocket) 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: Sending close_notify alert 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: TLS alert (write): warning: close notify 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[8]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG3[8]: transfer: s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: FD=4540 ifds=--x ofds=--- 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: FD=4792 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG5[8]: Connection closed: 64 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: Remote descriptor (FD=4792) closed 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: Local descriptor (FD=4540) closed 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[8]: Service [SLNP pem file] finished (0 left) log example when stunnel doesn't get stuck: 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: TLS connected: previous session reused 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: TLSv1.3 ciphersuite: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256-bit encryption) 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: Peer temporary key: X25519, 253 bits 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: Session id: AF8ED185555C6734403C71B514A3F6B75F8484A5AC4EAE6058CFF4D35D929B36 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: TLS state (connect): SSL negotiation finished successfully 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: TLS state (connect): SSL negotiation finished successfully 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Initializing application specific data for session authenticated 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: New session callback 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: Session id: 44E9010787EFDBC0FCA92724415AD30EF9EDB626D734D894061606C79CD26402 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server session ticket 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: Read socket closed (readsocket) 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Sending close_notify alert 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: TLS alert (write): warning: close notify 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG6[9]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG3[9]: transfer: s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: FD=2464 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: FD=2788 ifds=--x ofds=--- 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG5[9]: Connection closed: 64 byte(s) sent to TLS, 108 byte(s) sent to socket 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Remote descriptor (FD=2464) closed 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Local descriptor (FD=2788) closed 2020.12.21 14:49:06 LOG7[9]: Service [SLNP pem file] finished (0 left) My stunnel conf: debug = 7 output = stunnel.log fips = no options = NO_SSLv2 [SLNP pem file] key = SLNP_urmsand01_new.pem cert = SLNP_urmsand01_new.pem client = yes accept = 8003 connect = host:6443 TIMEOUTbusy = 30 TIMEOUTclose = 0 TIMEOUTconnect = 60 TIMEOUTidle = 86400 With the old stunnel(5.14) it doesn’t happen. Thanks, Ditty.

1 0

Stunnel 4 failing to connect to gmail
by Asif Iqbal 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

I am faling to connect to gmail. Not sure what that bind error means. iqbala@ghar:~$ sudo stunnel4 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Private key loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SSL context initialized for service ssmtp 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: stunnel 4.22 on i486-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: file ulimit = 1024 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: 500 clients allowed 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 10 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 11 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 12 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: Error binding ssmtp to 74.125.93.111:587 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: bind: Cannot assign requested address (99) Here is how my conf file looks like iqbala@ghar:~$ cat /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf | egrep -v "^;|^$" cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem foreground = yes sslVersion = SSLv3 chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4/ setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 pid = /stunnel4.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log client = yes [ssmtp] accept = smtp.gmail.com:587 connect = 25 Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu

5 9

EHLO localhost causing problem in smtp-relay.gmail.com
by sreyas-n＠hcl.com 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

We note that always EHLO command sent by sTunnel to SMTP server always been populated as "localhost". Note some well know SMTP server (or) SMTP relay servers such as smtp-relay.gmail.com, etc reject further communication with SMTP clients (as here sTunnel), if they receive initial handshake EHLO request itself as LOCALHOST. Please refer this link on why SMTP servers/ relay servers reject EHLO command with LOCALHOST - https://support.google.com/a/answer/2956491. Note because of this reason, we could use sTunnel as our encryption channel to communicate with SMTP server/relay server. Is there any specific reason behind in hardcoding the EHLO command with LOCALHOST always even in latest version of sTunnel - 5.57 version..? Always what would be in sTunnel functionality, if we change the EHLO command to populate as hostname (or) FQDN instead.

1 0

EHLO localhost
by sreyas-n＠hcl.com 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

We note that always EHLO command sent by sTunnel to SMTP server always been populated as "localhost". Note some well know SMTP server (or) SMTP relay servers such as smtp-relay.gmail.com, etc reject further communication with SMTP clients (as here sTunnel), if they receive initial handshake EHLO request itself as LOCALHOST. Please refer this link on why SMTP servers/ relay servers reject EHLO command with LOCALHOST - https://support.google.com/a/answer/2956491. Note because of this reason, we could use sTunnel as our encryption channel to communicate with SMTP server/relay server. Is there any specific reason behind in hardcoding the EHLO command with LOCALHOST always even in latest version of sTunnel - 5.57 version..? Always what would be in sTunnel functionality, if we change the EHLO command to populate as hostname (or) FQDN instead.

1 0

Segmentation fault on the stunnel 5.57 running on RHEL7
by paulrbk＠gmail.com 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

Hi All we have a segmentation fault on the stunnel 5.57 running on RHEL7 Dec 10 16:54:32 prod001 kernel: stunnel[1572]: segfault at 278 ip 00007f3fdca229c2 sp 00007f3fd9011a28 error 6 in libssl.so.1.0.2k[7f3fdc9da000+67000] $ uname -a Linux prod001 3.10.0-1160.2.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 21 21:00:09 EDT 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ rpm -qa|grep openssl openssl-devel-1.0.2k-19.el7.x86_64 xmlsec1-openssl-1.2.20-7.el7_4.x86_64 openssl-1.0.2k-19.el7.x86_64 openssl-libs-1.0.2k-19.el7.x86_64 below is the configuration =================================== pid = /home/admin/run/stunnel.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 #debug = 2 debug = 7 output = /home/admin/log/stunnel.log ######################################################## ### ### INSTANCE 1: program1 ### ### Tunnel for remote connection (Server_aaS) ### [program1-remote-to-local] cert = /home/admin/config/certs/prod001.crt key = /home/admin/config/certs/prod001.key accept = 192.168.1.33:7011 connect = 192.168.1.33:7001 ### Tunnel for local connection ### [program1-local-to-local] client = yes CAfile = /home/admin/config/certs/prod001.crt accept = 127.0.0.1:7011 connect = 192.168.1.33:7011 ### Tunnel to connect remote Tunnel ### SERVER-02 192.168.1.34:7021 ### [program1-01-to-02] client = yes CAfile = /home/admin/config/certs/prod002.crt accept = 192.168.1.33:7021 connect = 192.168.1.34:7021 ========================================== $ ./stunnel -help Initializing inetd mode configuration stunnel 5.57 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI Global options: chroot = directory to chroot stunnel process compression = compression type EGD = path to Entropy Gathering Daemon socket engine = auto|engine_id engineCtrl = cmd[:arg] engineDefault = TASK_LIST fips = yes|no FIPS 140-2 mode foreground = yes|quiet|no foreground mode (don't fork, log to stderr) log = append|overwrite log file output = file to append log messages pid = pid file RNDbytes = bytes to read from random seed files RNDfile = path to file with random seed data RNDoverwrite = yes|no overwrite seed datafiles with new random data syslog = yes|no send logging messages to syslog Service-level options: accept = [host:]port accept connections on specified host:port CApath = CA certificate directory for 'verify' option CAfile = CA certificate file for 'verify' option cert = certificate chain checkEmail = peer certificate email address checkHost = peer certificate host name pattern checkIP = peer certificate IP address ciphers = permitted ciphers for TLS 1.2 or older client = yes|no client mode (remote service uses TLS) config = command[:parameter] to execute connect = [host:]port to connect CRLpath = CRL directory CRLfile = CRL file curves = ECDH curve names debug = [facility].level (e.g. daemon.info) delay = yes|no delay DNS lookup for 'connect' option engineId = ID of engine to read the key from engineNum = number of engine to read the key from exec = file execute local inetd-type program execArgs = arguments for 'exec' (including $0) failover = rr|prio failover strategy ident = username for IDENT (RFC 1413) checking include = directory with configuration file snippets key = certificate private key local = IP address to be used as source for remote connections logId = connection identifier type OCSP = OCSP responder URL OCSPaia = yes|no check the AIA responders from certificates OCSPflag = OCSP responder flags OCSPnonce = yes|no send and verify the OCSP nonce extension options = TLS option to set/reset protocol = protocol to negotiate before TLS initialization currently supported: cifs, connect, imap, nntp, pgsql, pop3, proxy, smtp, socks protocolAuthentication = authentication type for protocol negotiations protocolDomain = domain for protocol negotiations protocolHost = host:port for protocol negotiations protocolPassword = password for protocol negotiations protocolUsername = username for protocol negotiations PSKidentity = identity for PSK authentication PSKsecrets = secrets for PSK authentication pty = yes|no allocate pseudo terminal for 'exec' option redirect = [host:]port to redirect on authentication failures renegotiation = yes|no support renegotiation requireCert = yes|no require client certificate reset = yes|no send TCP RST on error retry = yes|no retry connect+exec section service = service name setgid = groupname for setgid() setuid = username for setuid() sessionCacheSize = session cache size sessionCacheTimeout = session cache timeout (in seconds) sessiond = [host:]port use sessiond at host:port sni = master_service:host_name for an SNI virtual service socket = a|l|r:option=value[:value] set an option on accept/local/remote socket sslVersion = all|SSLv2|SSLv3|TLSv1|TLSv1.1|TLSv1.2 TLS method stack = thread stack size (in bytes) ticketKeySecret = secret key for encryption/decryption TLSv1.3 tickets ticketMacSecret = key for HMAC operations on TLSv1.3 tickets TIMEOUTbusy = seconds to wait for expected data TIMEOUTclose = seconds to wait for close_notify TIMEOUTconnect = seconds to connect remote host TIMEOUTidle = seconds to keep an idle connection transparent = none|source|destination|both transparent proxy mode verify = level of peer certificate verification verifyChain = yes|no verify certificate chain verifyPeer = yes|no verify peer certificate

1 0

Stunnel and CAPI engine: Issues after OpenSSL upgrade on server side
by Brent Kimberley 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

It looks like IBM might have been able to get MS CAPI to work with TLS1.2. That said, I think it would make more sense to switch to CNG API.

2 2

Cannot connect using PKI
by Greg Sanders 09 Dec '20

09 Dec '20

Hello, we have been connecting to a test API site where we specified a PEM cert saved locally, and succeeded. I believe this is the 'certificate pinning' approach. Now we are transitioning to the production API, where the tech documentation says there is no certificate needed, "the certificate is sent during the handshake". So a PKI client connection, I guess. But we can't connect. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Our stunnel config is below. Thanks. STUNNEL CONFIG FILE: debug = 7 output = stunnel.log sslVersion = all options = NO_SSLv2 ciphers = ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-DSS-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM [ice_client] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:8080 connect = 63.nnn.nnn.207:443 checkHost = *.xxxxx.com CAfile = ca-certs.pem ; CAPath = certs verifyChain = yes -- Greg Sanders Database Architect Yes Energy

1 0

Stunnel and CAPI engine: Issues after OpenSSL upgrade on server side
by Christian Keck 07 Dec '20

07 Dec '20

Hi there, we just upgraded a system that is used as a TLS-proxy for incoming connections using client-ssl-handshake from an old CentOS 6 to a recent Ubuntu LTS. By doing so, the OpenSSL was updated from 1.0.1e to 1.1.1f. Right after installation, the new OpenSSL complained about "too weak ca cypher", so I had to add a line "CipherString = DEFAULT:@SECLEVEL=1" to the openssl.conf to make things work again. After applying the changes, connections via browsers do work again using TLS 1.3. (We will generate a new host-CA some day, but for now we need a running system) Before the upgrade, Stunnel in CAPI-mode worked wih TLS 1.2 encryption. Now after updating the server, it refused to connect at all. Using version 5.56 of Stunnel, I see the following lines in the log: error queue: ssl/statem/statem_lib.c:298: error:141F0006:SSL routines:tls_construct_cert_verify:EVP lib SSL_connect: engines/e_capi.c:814: error:8006F074:lib(128):capi_rsa_priv_enc:function not supported If I nail the protocol setting to TLS1.1 in the apache2-config, the connection is possible again with version 5.56. Any later versions of Stunnel completely refuse to work, I always get lines like: SSL_read: ssl/ssl_rsa.c:36: error:140C618E:SSL routines:SSL_use_certificate:ca md too weak I tried several things I found in the net regarding tweaking openssl.conf and/or stunnel.conf, but I can't get it running with version 5.57 or later. So my questions is: What can I do to get Stunnel working again with at least TLS1.2 (or even better TLS1.3 like I get in most browsers)? Re-generating the host-CA (and thus needing to re-create all client certs) is unfortunately no option for the moment. Many thanks in advance! Cheers, Christian Keck

3 4

Failed to initialize TLS
by Campbell, David 20 Nov '20

20 Nov '20

TLS is not initializing. This is the output. Is there something that I should be including in my conf that would produce this? Or is it just a generic error? [ ] Initializing inetd mode configuration [ ] Running on Windows 6.2 [ ] No limit detected for the number of clients [ ] stunnel 5.57 on x64-pc-mingw32-gnu platform [ ] Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.1.1h 22 Sep 2020 [ ] Threading WIN32 Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,OCSP,PSK,SNI [ ] errno: (*_errno()) [ ] GUI message loop initialized [ ] Initializing inetd mode configuration [ ] Running on Windows 6.2 [ . ] Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf [ . ] UTF-8 byte order mark not detected [ ! ] No compression method is available [ ! ] Global options: Failed to initialize TLS [ ! ] Configuration failed [ ] Deallocating temporary section defaults [ ! ] Server is down ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the named recipient(s) intended by the sender of this message. This email, and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or proprietary information of Scientific Research Corporation. If you are not a named recipient, any copying, using, disclosing or distributing to others the information in this email and attachments is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the email, any attachments, and all copies thereof from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts or hard copies of the email and attachments. EXPORT COMPLIANCE NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain technical data subject to U.S export restrictions under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) or the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Export or transfer of this technical data and/or related information to any foreign person(s) or entity(ies), either within the U.S. or outside of the U.S., may require advance export authorization by the appropriate U.S. Government agency prior to export or transfer. In addition, technical data may not be exported or transferred to certain countries or specified designated nationals identified by U.S. embargo controls without prior export authorization. By accepting this email and any attachments, all recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR, EAR and embargo compliance requirements.

1 0

PSK Configuration
by Giulio Regazzo 16 Nov '20

16 Nov '20

Hi, I'm new to stunnel. And I'm trying to configure a server that accepts TCP sockets connections only from clients that have a pre-shared certificate. Looking at the online documentation I found the verifyPeer option, but it is described to be used on client side. Trying to use it on server side I achieved my goal but only if the client has the whole certificate (private + public). My question is: Can I obtain in some way the same result sharing only the public part of the certificate? Currently I'm using a configuration like this one (skipping the accept and connect options): [Server] cert=wholeCert.pem verifyPeer=yes [Client] cert=wholeCert.pem verifyPeer=yes CAFile=wholeCert.pem and I'm looking for something like: [Server] cert=wholeCert.pem verifyPeer=yes [Client] verifyPeer=yes CAFile=publicCert.pem If I try this second option the server refuses the connection in handshake phase saying that the client didn't provide any certificate. Is there a way to achieve this? Thank you.

2 3

hi
by fieldengineer59＠yahoo.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

hi

1 0

hi
by fieldengineer59＠yahoo.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

hi

1 0

hi
by fieldengineer59＠yahoo.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

hi

1 0

hi
by fieldengineer59＠yahoo.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

hi

1 0

Stunnel failover
by Ray 02 Nov '20

02 Nov '20

Has anyone tested this scenario with a number of stunnel clients and servers chained in a row with failover capability. The problem is that Stunnel in server mode accepts a connection and performs the SSL handshake before it checks if the connect endpoint is reachable. This causes the downlink client peer wrongly assumes that the link is up and therefore would not try the alternative failover endpoint. You will only observe this problem if you cascade several nodes in a row Ex: Dummy TCP Client <-> Stunnel1 (client) <-> Stunnel2 (server) <-> Stunnel3 (client) <-> Dummy SSL Server In this scenario, dummy client connects to S1, S1 connects to S2 (SSL), S2 tries to connect to S3 but since Dummy SSL server is down, S3 rejects but this rejection is not bouncing back to Dummy Client because S2 has down the downlink handshake and therefore S1 assumes everything is OK. So, the ultimate question is how can we tell Stunnel to first try to connect to endpoints and then send a SYN-ACK back to downlink TCP connection request. This way, a client sends a SYN to Stunnel, Stunnel holds on 3-way handshake, tries to connect to the uplink and completes the downlink handshake only if the uplink connection is OK.

1 0

Stunnel - SSL socket error Connection timed out
by sravan kumar 22 Oct '20

22 Oct '20

Hi Team, Need help on one issue. We recently configured stunnel on our servers for securely establishing DB connections[certs exchanged on stunnel client and server]. Stunnel installed on client machine. Stunnel installed on server machine. Configurations are completed and publishing working for sometime like 1 hr. After that the stunnel on the destination server did not respond and we noticed "SSL socket error: Connection timed out (110)". We made updates to the stunnel.conf with below entries but they are not updating. TIMEOUTclose = 0 TIMEOUTconnect = 200 TIMEOUTidle = 86400 Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Sravan

1 0

5.57 cb_new_auth
by duncan.morris＠cdl.co.uk 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

When compiling 5.57 against OpenSSL 1.0.2 I am getting compiler warnings for the cb_new_auth definition. ENGD20 is running V8.4 [840] on ALPHA Building with OpenSSL 1.0.2 Image : STUNNEL.HPE_ALPHA_EXE "session authenticated", cb_new_auth, NULL, NULL); .................................^ %CC-W-PTRMISMATCH, In this statement, the referenced type of the pointer value "cb_new_auth" is "function (pointer to void, pointer to void, pointer to struct crypto_ex_data_st, int, long, pointer to void) returning void", which is not compatible with "function (pointer to void, pointer to void, pointer to struct crypto_ex_data_st, int, long, pointer to void) returning int" . at line number 80 in file DISK$ORACLE:[STUNNEL_BUILDS.stunnel-557.src]ssl.c;1 This appears to be the result of OpenSSL 1.0.2 defining this as an integer function, whilst 1.1.1 defines it as a void function. Duncan

1 0

Changelog policy / watch out for 5.57 if you have 1024-bit keys in use
by ian.bamforth＠tracsis.com 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

Morning, [ ] Loading certificate from file: /opt/clients/certificate_2020-04-23.pem [!] SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file: ssl/ssl_rsa.c:301: error:140AB18F:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_certificate:ee key too small [!] Service [RailCompanion]: Failed to initialize TLS context [!] Configuration failed We encountered a production outage yesterday when upgrading to 5.57, as it seems that a new securityLevel config has been added, a side-effect of which looks to have been the rejection of certificates of less than 2048 bits by default. We still had a 1024 bit cert in use. Obviously we should've had monitoring to check that stunnel was actually running (we will next time!) but it seems to me like this is a change that deserved more attention in the log, which only identifies it as a new feature, with no mention of breaking changes. Anyway, our problem is now solved, but if you encounter stunnel failing to start when you next upgrade then this might be a candidate to look at. Ian

1 0

Can't Connect To Gmail
by lrogersjunk＠gmail.com 17 Oct '20

17 Oct '20

Hello all - I have tried to set up stunnel to send emails through gmail from a legacy device that can only send to port 25. But I'm having no success. My config file seems correct, as it matches config files posted by others who appear able to send through gmail. This is what it looks like: output = stunnel-log.txt debug = 7 Taskbar = yes [gmail-imap] client = yes accept = 143 connect = imap.gmail.com:993 verifyChain = yes CAfile = ca-certs.pem checkHost = imap.gmail.com OCSPaia = yes [gmail-smtp] client = yes accept = 25 connect = smtp.gmail.com:465 verifyChain = yes CAfile = ca-certs.pem checkHost = smtp.gmail.com OCSPaia = yes I originally thought the problem was gmail's recent new security features, requiring app-passwords for apps that do not support gmail's latest security features. So I set up an app-password for use by stunnel but that didn't work, either. So I then turned on "allow less secure apps" in gmail and used the account's original password (not the app-password). But even that doesn't work. So I'm at a total loss and can't think of anything else to do. Can anyone assist? Many thanks.

4 3

Stunnel & Gmail security
by BOXI31 TEST 16 Oct '20

16 Oct '20

Hi all, To make "Stunnel 5.31" work with Gmail, I have to go in security settings of Gmail and "allow less secure apps to access my account". Is it mandatory ? Is it possible to set Stunnel to access Gmail without lowering it security level ? How ? I checked in log file TLS v1.2 is used by Stunnel but Gmail still consider it as a "less secure app." ! Regards, Steve

2 1

clarification on Security BugFix released in version 5.57
by svitatissimo2004＠hotmail.com 15 Oct '20

15 Oct '20

looking the changelog of latest version of stunnle (version 5.57) I see the following statement: "The "redirect" option was fixed to properly handle "verifyChain = yes" (thx to Rob Hoes)." It is possible to have more information on the vulnerability fixed?

1 0

clarification on Security BugFix released in version 5.57
by svitatissimo2004＠hotmail.com 15 Oct '20

15 Oct '20

looking the changelog of latest version of stunnle (version 5.57) I see the following statement: "The "redirect" option was fixed to properly handle "verifyChain = yes" (thx to Rob Hoes)." It is possible to have more information on the vulnerability fixed?

1 0

CERT: Pre-verification error: unsupported certificate purpose
by Bob Bob 12 Oct '20

12 Oct '20

Hi, I just updated to version 5.57 and the config I used for ever does not work anymore. I regenerated the self certs using the "Build a Self-signed stunnel.pem" in Windows and made sure the CN was matching the hostname of the server machine. I understand there is an issue with the self signed certificate... ...but it was working fine under 5.56. Server configuration [Server_SyncThing] cert = stunnel.pem accept = 999 connect = 127.0.0.1:24596 ciphers = PSK PSKsecrets = psk.txt Client configuration [SyncThing] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:24596 connect = 192.168.0.102:999 verifyPeer = yes CAfile = stunnel.pem PSKsecrets = psk.txt Service [SyncThing] connected remote server from 192.168.1.44:5455 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Setting remote socket options (FD=1516) 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Remote descriptor (FD=1516) initialized 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG6[33]: SNI: sending servername: 192.168.0.102 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG6[33]: Peer certificate required 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: TLS state (connect): before SSL initialization 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Initializing application specific data for session authenticated 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG6[33]: PSK client configured for identity "user1" 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Initializing application specific data for session authenticated 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write client hello 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write client hello 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server hello 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: TLS state (connect): TLSv1.3 read encrypted extensions 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Verification started at depth=0: C=FR, ST=Centre, L=Marseilles, O=CA, OU=CA, CN= TRUCK-D98J8TY 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG4[33]: CERT: Pre-verification error: unsupported certificate purpose 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG4[33]: Rejected by CERT at depth=0: C=FR, ST=Centre, L=Marseilles, O=CA, OU=CA, CN= TRUCK-D98J8TY 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: TLS alert (write): fatal: unsupported certificate 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG3[33]: SSL_connect: ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:1913: error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG5[33]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2020.10.12 14:25:06 LOG7[33]: Remote descriptor (FD=1516) closed Any help would be welcome. Thanks.

2 1

Stunnel inetd Linux configuration
by Marco Marchi 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Good morning, I'm trying to configure Stunnel on Linux (Slackware 14). Can anybody post an example of configuration file in order to run and manage Stunnel by means of inetd, keeping in mind that goal is to secure pop3 and imap? Openssl is already installed and running (version 1.1.1g, april 2020). Stunnel version downloaded and installed is 5.56. Certifcate has been generated by means of Openssl. Issues are related to the right syntax in stunnel.conf. Thank you in advance. Marco

1 0

sslVersion
by Ray 25 Sep '20

25 Sep '20

Hi Is sslVersion a global parameter that belongs to all segments or can it be inside a segment to only affect that segment? Example: output = /tmp/stunnel.log debug = emerg sslVersion = all # I assume it is applied to all Stunnel connection definitions [Stunnel_1] sslVersion = tls1_2 # How about this? I only want Stunnel_1 to be affected with sslVersion tls1_2 option. client = yes accept = 2222 connect = some_domain.com.au:8449 verify = 2 CAfile = /etc/stunnel/certs/root_digicert_ca.crt Thanks Ray

1 0

Address already in use (98) error trying to run stunnel client in Ubuntu Docker container
by greg＠yesenergy.com 24 Sep '20

24 Sep '20

Hello all, I'm getting the following error when I try to connect to a remote server from inside a running Docker container: "Binding service [client] to 127.0.0.1:1589: Address already in use (98)". I don't think this port is actually in use, and I've tried other ports with the same results. I know that this configuration works in my Windows dev machine, from which I have consistently connected to the remote server, no problem. I suspect this might be related to Docker's internal networking schema and port-forwarding, but I thought I would ask this group if anyone knows how to overcome this hurdle. Thanks for listening! Here is the config: [client] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:1589 connect = nn.nnn.nnn.nnn:443 checkHost = xxxxxxxxx.com sslVersion = TLSv1.2 CAfile = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/my_pemfile.pem verifyPeer = yes Here is the log trace: [ ] Clients allowed=512000 [.] stunnel 5.56 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform [.] Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.1.1d 10 Sep 2019 [.] Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI [ ] errno: (*__errno_location ()) [.] Reading configuration from file /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf [.] UTF-8 byte order mark detected [.] FIPS mode disabled [ ] Compression disabled [ ] No PRNG seeding was required [ ] Initializing service [client] [ ] Ciphers: DES-CBC3-SHA:IDEA-CBC-MD5-DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:AES256-SHA [ ] TLSv1.3 ciphersuites: TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 [ ] TLS options: 0x02100004 (+0x00000000, -0x00000000) [ ] No certificate or private key specified [.] Configuration successful [ ] Binding service [client] [ ] Listening file descriptor created (FD=8) [ ] Setting accept socket options (FD=8) [ ] Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket [.] Binding service [client] to 127.0.0.1:1589: Address already in use (98) [ ] Listening file descriptor created (FD=8) [ ] Setting accept socket options (FD=8) [ ] Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket [.] Binding service [client] to 127.0.0.1:1589: Address already in use (98) [!] Binding service [client] failed [ ] Deallocating section defaults [ ] Unbinding service [client] [ ] Service [client] closed [ ] Deallocating section [client]

1 0

Stunnel to smtp-relay.gmail.com
by Anton Palmgård 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Hi, a few days ago up to a week my stunnel connection to smtp-gmail.gmail.com. stopped working with the error: ep 21 17:25:57 stunnel LOG50: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket Sep 21 17:25:57 stunnel LOG30: Remote server is not RFC 1425 compliant Sep 21 17:25:57 stunnel LOG50: Service [to_gmail] connected remote server from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:29662 Tried from 2 different Locations / sites (i.e companies) same error. The relay work fine without client settings but that leaves TLS to the endpoint.. Office 365 relay works fine with TLS. Contacted Google support but the claimed nothing have been changed. I assume somehting with the TLS version/ CIPHERS is wrong ? Conf simply looks like this: cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem chroot = /var/tmp/stunnel setuid = stunnel setgid = stunnel [to_gmail] client = yes accept = 0.0.0.0:587 connect = smtp-relay.gmail.com:587 debug = 7 TIMEOUTclose = 0 protocol = smtp BR, Anton.

2 4

Stunnel failover
by Ray 16 Sep '20

16 Sep '20

Stunnel's failover option with prio settings works fine but the application first tries 3 syn to connect to the first endpoint and if failed then it tries the second endpoint. Is there any way to configure stunnel to try only once and failover to the second connection endpoint?

1 0

using Android Keystore with stunnel
by blacksun＠directbox.com 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

Hello, i am using stunnel 5.56 on Android 7.0. It is a non-rooted device. Android stores keys and certs in the android keystore. I am using a Let's Encrypt Cert on serverside, and on clients the options veryChain and chechHost. How can i use the System-integrated CA-Certs of Android for verifying the server-cert issued by Let's Encrypt? When i am searching the net, there are infos saying that the certs and keys are not accessible by filestructure, but there would be apis to access the keystore. The keystore would be protected with the PIN of the device. Thanks.

1 0

How to configure stunnel as HTTP proxy on Windows?
by Jason Long 08 Sep '20

08 Sep '20

Hello, I want to use stunnel on Windows as HTTP proxy, I changed the configuration as below: ; Encrypted HTTP proxy authenticated with a client certificate ; located in the Windows certificate store [example-proxy] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:8080 connect = google.com:8443 ;engineId = capi ; Encrypted HTTP proxy authenticated with a client certificate ; located in a cryptographic token [example-pkcs11] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:8080 connect = google.com:8443 ;engineId = pkcs11 cert = pkcs11:token=MyToken;object=MyCert key = pkcs11:token=MyToken;object=MyKey But, it show me configuration error. How can I solve it? Thank you.

1 0

Stunnel - how to block IPs?
by Brent Kimberley 04 Sep '20

04 Sep '20

Hi James.To the best of my knowledge, your options include Darwin firewall and HAProxy - geoip. >>Just wondering if there is a way to have Stunnel not accept connection from certain IPs? stunnel -version stunnel 5.56 on x86_64-apple-darwin18.7.0 platform Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI

1 0

Stunnel - how to block IPs?
by James Brown 03 Sep '20

03 Sep '20

Just wondering if there is a way to have Stunnel not accept connection from certain IPs? stunnel -version stunnel 5.56 on x86_64-apple-darwin18.7.0 platform Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI Thanks, James.

1 0

TLS1.0 fallback when only TLS1.2 allowed
by Wojciech Machula 31 Aug '20

31 Aug '20

So I've configured my stunnel to only use TLS1.2 and usually works ok. However when client gets some bad L7 response it send a TCP RST, after which all subsequent stunnel TLS Client Hellos are some hybrid of TLS1.0/TLS1.2, as can be seen in tshark output below. Once I restart the whole stunnel process subsequent TLS handshakes work fine using TLS1.2, until the next client RST is received. $ stunnel -version stunnel 4.56 on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu platform $ cat /etc/centos-release CentOS Linux release 7.8.2003 (Core) $cat /etc/stunnel/dsr2rtcg-stunnel.conf output = /var/log/stunnel pid = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [poc] cert = /etc/pki/tls/certs/stunnel/aaa.crt key = /etc/pki/tls/private/stunnel/aaa.key CAfile = /etc/pki/tls/certs/stunnel/bbb.crt client = yes sslVersion = TLSv1.2 options = NO_TLSv1 accept = 172.18.180.78:45154 connect = 10.74.0.196:45154 ciphers = TLSv1.2+HIGH:!aNULL $ tshark -nn -V -d tcp.port==45154,ssl -r 20200729_09:42:44-port45154.pcap -2R "ssl.handshake" -c 1 | grep -i tls -B3 Secure Sockets Layer SSL Record Layer: Handshake Protocol: Client Hello Content Type: Handshake (22) Version: TLS 1.0 (0x0301) -- Handshake Protocol: Client Hello Handshake Type: Client Hello (1) Length: 1610 Version: TLS 1.2 (0x0303)

6 14

Sslkeylog
by Brent Kimberley 22 Aug '20

22 Aug '20

>>Any suggestions on sslkeylog via stunnel application Call SSL_CTX_set_keylog_callback() !? On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 16:44 tayyib ahmed <tayyib76(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys > > Is there any option to set sslkeylog to get ssl session id for stunnel > session? > > Br xx >

2 2

How to archive DNS load balance in stunnel client?
by Peter Zhao 22 Aug '20

22 Aug '20

Hi, We are trying to use DNS load balance in a stunnel client with round-robin algorithm. service.example.com is mapping to two ips. But when we update DNS to remove one of ips for service.example.com stunnel client still forward requests to both ips. How to make stunnel client to resolve domain name and refresh its cache? Here is stunnel configuration. sslVersion=TLSv1.2 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem output=/var/log/stunnel.log [service-client] client = yes accept = localhost:4680 connect = service.example.com:4680 [service-server] client = no accept = 10.10.0.16:4680 connect = loclhost:80 Here is the resolving result for service.example.com. ;; ANSWER SECTION: service.example.com. 5 IN A 10.10.0.16 service.example.com. 5 IN A 10.10.0.8

3 3

Sslkeylog
by tayyib ahmed 16 Aug '20

16 Aug '20

Hi Guys Is there any option to set sslkeylog to get ssl session id for stunnel session? Br xx

1 1

Stunnel 5.56 Windows 10 Service - Not functioning after Reboot
by Rod Marr 16 Aug '20

16 Aug '20

Hi all, I have installed Stunnel 5.56 win64 on a fully updated Windows 10 machine to work with Blue Iris. Stunnel operates well when I manually start it however I cannot get it to work automatically after a reboot. I have run the run the “stunnel Service Install” and “stunnel Service Start” shortcuts supplied, and in the first instance the service installs and starts. I can then connect through Stunnel to my Blue Iris server. I have found that after I reboot, the Stunnel service appears to start automatically but it is not functional. I cannot connect through it to Blue Iris. Stunnel is visible and Running in the Windows 10 Services list (from services.msc) and the Windows Task Manager shows a Process and Service active. To rectify this I can manually issue the “stunnel Service Stop”, followed by the “stunnel Service Start” shortcuts and the service becomes functional again. I have tried turning on debug info and the stunnel log file in stunnel.conf and see that log entries only begin after I have done the stop/start manual process. Thanks for any insight to what I’m sure I am missing here. Rod Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

2 2

Sslkeylog
by Brent Kimberley 14 Aug '20

14 Aug '20

No sign of SSL_CTX_set_keylog_callback()... Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:44:22 +0100 From: tayyib ahmed <tayyib76(a)gmail.com> To: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Subject:Hi Guys Is there any option to set sslkeylog to get ssl session id for stunnel session? Br xx

1 0

Timeout issues
by gorf＠hyperfunk.club 05 Aug '20

05 Aug '20

Hi, I'm using stunnel v5.56 on FreeBSD to proxy connections to a web server (running Apache), for a small number of users. Users connecting to the service keep running into issues with timeouts. I see timeout errors in the stunnel log messages: services stunnel[7510]: LOG3[188]: transfer: s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing I tried changing stunnel to use the proxy protocol and enabled it on Apache, too. I don't know if that will help but at least then the web server gets the correct, remote IP address. Can anyone offer ideas/suggestions to fix this problem? Is there anything I can test or check to help diagnose the issue? The configuration is very basic: [apache] accept = 20888 protocol = proxy connect = 192.168.0.10:8000 PSKsecrets = /usr/local/etc/psksecrets.txt

1 0

Getting incoming Exchange online (Office 365) emails to go to port 110 and not 995
by Brent Kimberley 23 Jul '20

23 Jul '20

Office365 IMAP4S + POP3S is dropping legacy authentication in favour of OAUTH2.0 authentication -- effective October 2020. (Some may have longer.) How do you you plan to migrate to authentication? Do you plan to upgrade your client(s) or inject an OAUTH2.0 transparent proxy ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 01:22:06 +0000 From: Mel Gilbert <m.gilbert(a)baymedicalgroup.com.au> To: "stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org" <stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org> Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Getting incoming Exchange online (Office 365) emails to go to port 110 and not 995 Message-ID: <SY4P282MB074766F32238B92A3D951499C1760(a)SY4P282MB0747.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Trying to get an application with inbuilt email to receive emails using POP and port 110. However we use Office 365 and I have tried below config but it is not working. I want people to send email to an Exchange Online Account port 995 and it gets forwarded on to the email app on port 110 client = yes output = stunnel-log.txt debug=7 taskbar=yes [POP3 Incoming] accept = 110 connect = Outlook.office365.com:995 cert = stunnel.pem [SMTP Outgoing] protocol = smtp accept = 25 connect = smtp.office365.com:587 cert = stunnel.pem The outgoing email works fine using SMTP relay that I've set up on Office 365 but cant get the incoming emails to work. Any help would be appreciated Thanks Mel

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] Getting incoming Exchange online (Office 365) emails to go to port 110 and not 995
by Mel Gilbert 23 Jul '20

23 Jul '20

Hi Trying to get an application with inbuilt email to receive emails using POP and port 110. However we use Office 365 and I have tried below config but it is not working. I want people to send email to an Exchange Online Account port 995 and it gets forwarded on to the email app on port 110 client = yes output = stunnel-log.txt debug=7 taskbar=yes [POP3 Incoming] accept = 110 connect = Outlook.office365.com:995 cert = stunnel.pem [SMTP Outgoing] protocol = smtp accept = 25 connect = smtp.office365.com:587 cert = stunnel.pem The outgoing email works fine using SMTP relay that I've set up on Office 365 but cant get the incoming emails to work. Any help would be appreciated Thanks Mel

1 0

Transparent Proxy help.
by Steven Relf 21 Jul '20

21 Jul '20

Hello List, I am working on a small project where I need to encrypt nfs traffic, and Stunnel looks to be ideal, the only issue I'm having is getting the transparent part to work I have a client machine, running stunnel config below #GLOBAL####################################################### sslVersion = TLSv1.2 TIMEOUTidle = 600 renegotiation = no FIPS = no options = NO_SSLv2 options = NO_SSLv3 options = SINGLE_DH_USE options = SINGLE_ECDH_USE options = CIPHER_SERVER_PREFERENCE syslog = yes debug = 7 ;chroot = /var/empty/stunnel libwrap = yes service = 3d-nfsd curve = secp521r1 #CREDENTIALS################################################## verify = 4 CAfile = /etc/stunnel/nfs-tls.pem cert = /etc/stunnel/nfs-tls.pem #ROLE######################################################### client = yes connect = fqdn:2363 and the client which is running ontop of the nfs-ganesha server config below #GLOBAL####################################################### TIMEOUTidle = 600 renegotiation = no FIPS = no options = NO_SSLv2 options = NO_SSLv3 options = SINGLE_DH_USE options = SINGLE_ECDH_USE options = CIPHER_SERVER_PREFERENCE syslog = yes debug = 7 setuid = nobody setgid = nobody chroot = /var/empty/stunnel libwrap = yes service = MC-nfsd ; cd /var/empty; mkdir -p stunnel/etc; cd stunnel/etc; ; echo 'MC-nfsd: ALL EXCEPT 5.6.7.8' >> hosts.deny; ; chcon -t stunnel_etc_t hosts.deny curve = secp521r1 #CREDENTIALS################################################## verify = 4 CAfile = /etc/stunnel/nfs-tls.pem cert = /etc/stunnel/nfs-tls.pem #ROLE######################################################### connect = 127.0.0.1:2049 I have had a look through the documentation and I believe I need to set transparent = source on the client side, and then set some ip tables firewall rules. Does anyone have a guide, or some advice on how to get this to work. Generally what happens if I set the firewall rules, on the client, and set the transparent to source I just get connection closed by remote host. I never actually see the traffic leave the client host. To confirm, when not using transparent everything works correctly, accept the server side sees the connection coming from 127.0.0.1 Thanks Rgds Steve. The future has already arrived. It's just not evenly distributed yet - William Gibson Steven Relf - Technical Authority: Cloud Native Infrastructure srelf(a)ukcloud.com +44 1252 936019 / +44 7500 085 864 www.ukcloud.com A8, Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, GU14 0LX Notice: This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of UKCloud Ltd. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorised to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. UKCloud reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. UKCloud Ltd is registered in England and Wales: Company No: 07619797. Registered office: Hartham Park, Hartham, Corsham, Wiltshire SN13 0RP.

1 0

Used Multi Service
by Ramin Malekgahsemi 09 Jul '20

09 Jul '20

Hi Dear Friends I used Stunnel 5.49 32 bit For server This Config cert = C:\Program Files\stunnel\config\stunnel.pem fips = no [socks] accept = 443 connect = 1010 If define New Service For example cert = C:\Program Files\stunnel\config\stunnel.pem fips = no [s1] accept = 443 connect = 1010 [s2] accept = 445 connect = 1020 Service Not work How Solve This Problem THX

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] winsock permissions issue (i.e. WSAEACCES 10013 / 0x271D)
by flash＠vicsmba.com 29 Jun '20

29 Jun '20

It will never be entirely random. Some range more than likely. You may be able to restrict the range. You could certainly set stunnel up for each “random” port. E VICS, LLC Eric S Eberhard 2933 W Middle Verde Rd Camp Verde, AZ 86322 928-567-3727 (land line) 928-301-7537 (cell phone) http://www.vicsmba.com <http://www.vicsmba.com/> https://www.facebook.com/groups/286143052248115 From: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org> On Behalf Of Brent Kimberley Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 4:11 PM To: Thomas Ward <teward(a)thomas-ward.net>; stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org; Coviello, Paul <pcoviello(a)ccsusa.com> Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] winsock permissions issue (i.e. WSAEACCES 10013 / 0x271D) What are you trying to accomplish? I.e. Is TLS the best wrapper for the job? (i.e. TCP over TCP.) On Thursday, June 25, 2020, 11:44:38 a.m. EDT, Coviello, Paul <pcoviello(a)ccsusa.com <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Maybe, I also just found out that the port it goes out is not what I thought it was. It’s a random port. Not sure if it’s doable now. Thanks for your help

1 0

winsock permissions issue (i.e. WSAEACCES 10013 / 0x271D)
by Brent Kimberley 26 Jun '20

26 Jun '20

Hi Paul. With respect to your winsock permissions issue (i.e. WSAEACCES 10013 / 0x271D), did you open the port in your firewall and authorize communication via anti-virus? > Hi I have a windows 10 machine that I?ve got this running on, and the > screen shot below is what I keep getting and I am unable to find the issue, > > Can someone please shed some light as to what is wrong? And what else you may need.

3 4

server is down message
by Coviello, Paul 24 Jun '20

24 Jun '20

Hi I have a windows 10 machine that I've got this running on, and the screen shot below is what I keep getting and I am unable to find the issue, Can someone please shed some light as to what is wrong? And what else you may need. Thanks Paul [cid:[email protected]]

3 4

Fwd: Update Stunnel 5.44 - Ubuntu 18.04
by Juan Amores 19 Jun '20

19 Jun '20

---------- Forwarded message --------- De: Juan Amores <canalamores(a)gmail.com> Date: jue., 18 jun. 2020 a las 20:03 Subject: *Update Stunnel 5.44 - Ubuntu 18.04* I installed Stunnel4 via apt-get install command. The version you installed for me is old (5.44), I have tried updating it via apt-get update but there are no updated packages in Ubuntu 18.04. Is there a way to update it and keep it working as a service like before? Attached screenshot with linux, stunnel and openssl versions. Any other additional data you need to provide just ask me. [image: stunnel.png] Greetings, Juan Amores

2 2

Fw: How to configure STunnel so that new log file is automatically created after a certain threshold
by Muhammad Muneeb Hashmi 17 Jun '20

17 Jun '20

Hi STunnel Team, Is there a way where a new STunnel log file is automatically generated when the current log file reaches a certain threshold in Windows. Any help will be highly appreciated. Regards,Muneeb

1 0