- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

Problem: eMail over SMTP on port 587 accepted without error but not forwarded
by Ben Stover 02 Nov '17

02 Nov '17

After a long time of successful usage of stunnel on a Windows 7 system I experienced now permanent problems with sending messages from my local email client over stunnel + SMTP to the remote smtp-server on port 587. Again: my local client+stunnel setup is/was untouched. When I send now messages to remote port 587 (as before) they are silently accepted but NOT forwarded to the final destination. No error messages was returned. The only thing I could imagine is that the webhoster changed the mail server certificate. How does stunnel handle this scenario? Do I have to tell stunnel that the remote certificate changed? how? Receiving eMails through POP3 on port 995 works. WebHoster has no clue what the reason is. The (anonymized) log below shows the transfer Any help is welcomed. Thank you Peter 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=388 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=464 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=468 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=472 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=476 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=480 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=484 ifds=r-x ofds=r-- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=488 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=492 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=496 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=500 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=504 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=508 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=512 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=516 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=520 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=524 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: FD=528 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: Service [mail-smtp] accepted (FD=904) from 127.0.0.1:47872 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: Creating a new thread 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[main]: New thread created 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: Service [mail-smtp] started 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG5[537]: Service [mail-smtp] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:47872 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG6[537]: s_connect: connecting 195.54.77.83:587 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 195.54.77.83:587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG5[537]: s_connect: connected 195.54.77.83:587 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG5[537]: Service [mail-smtp] connected remote server from 192.168.0.10:47873 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: Remote descriptor (FD=876) initialized 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 220 foobar.testserver.com ESMTP Postfix 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: -> 220 foobar.testserver.com ESMTP Postfix 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: -> EHLO localhost 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 250-foobar.testserver.com 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 250-PIPELINING 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 250-SIZE 104857600 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 250-ETRN 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 250-STARTTLS 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 250-8BITMIME 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 250 DSN 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: -> STARTTLS 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: <- 220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG6[537]: SNI: sending servername: foobar.testserver.com 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG6[537]: Peer certificate not required 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): before/connect initialization 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG6[537]: Certificate verification disabled 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG6[537]: Certificate verification disabled 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 read server certificate A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 read server key exchange A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG6[537]: Client certificate not requested 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 read server done A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 write client key exchange A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 read server session ticket A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: 2 client connect(s) requested 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: 2 client connect(s) succeeded 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: 0 client renegotiation(s) requested 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: 0 session reuse(s) 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG6[537]: TLS connected: new session negotiated 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG6[537]: Negotiated TLSv1.2 ciphersuite ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256-bit encryption) 2017.11.02 13:03:51 LOG7[537]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG6[537]: Read socket closed (readsocket) 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG7[537]: Sending close_notify alert 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG7[537]: TLS alert (write): warning: close notify 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG6[537]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG7[537]: TLS alert (read): warning: close notify 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG6[537]: TLS closed (SSL_read) 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG7[537]: Sent socket write shutdown 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG5[537]: Connection closed: 2954 byte(s) sent to TLS, 337 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG7[537]: Remote descriptor (FD=876) closed 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG7[537]: Local descriptor (FD=904) closed 2017.11.02 13:03:52 LOG7[537]: Service [mailo-smtp] finished (0 left)

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] How to distinguish stunnel definition between SMTP through SSL-TLS vs. STARTTLS?
by Harris, Douglas (SSC/SPC) 26 Oct '17

26 Oct '17

> Ok, if I specify > > protocol=smtp > > what does that mean: "Connect through SSL-TLS protocol" or "connect through STARTTLS protocol"? That means connect using STARTTLS. > It seems to me that I ALWAYS have to specify "protocol=smtp" for ALL smtp-server connects. You don't. If you are not using STARTTLS you don't specify "protocol=". > Is this done only by port number 465 vs 587? No. > That would mean there is a hidden configuration by convention! Indeed. That would be bad. > What if the webhoster would set up a special mail server at port 8888? Then you would specify port 8888 in your "connect=" config

1 0

How to distinguish stunnel definition between SMTP through SSL-TLS vs. STARTTLS?
by Ben Stover 26 Oct '17

26 Oct '17

As yyou know there are two types of letting a local email client connect to remote secured SMTP server: 1.) through SSL-TLS and 2.) through STARTTLS How do I distinguish betwen these connection types in the stunnel.conf setup file? In a previous post I was told to look at the "protocol" parameter. Ok, if I specify protocol=smtp what does that mean: "Connect through SSL-TLS protocol" or "connect through STARTTLS protocol"? It seems to me that I ALWAYS have to specify "protocol=smtp" for ALL smtp-server connects. The stunnel documentation does not explain how to setup the *.conf file for each of the variants. Is this done only by port number 465 vs 587? That would mean there is a hidden configuration by convention! What if the webhoster would set up a special mail server at port 8888? Ben

1 0

stunnel and TLS1.2 for IE
by Thomas GMX 20 Oct '17

20 Oct '17

Hello. I have successfully configured my email client (Outlook 2010) to my provider with TLS1.2 via stunnel running as a service. config: debug = 5 engine = capi [freenet-pop3s] client = yes EngineID = capi accept = localhost:2110 connect = mx.freenet.de:995 [freenet-smpts] client = yes EngineID = capi accept = localhost:2025 connect = mx.freenet.de:465 That was no problem. But at this point I am wondering if it is possible and how I can configure stunnel so that "all" https traffic from Internet Explorer is going through stunnel and connect to internet with highest secure level supported. Not only to one specific server (connect = xyz.net) but to all servers given in IE address. By now I guess that I have to set IE so that it uses a https-proxy at "localhost:xxx" with stunnel config "accept = localhost:xxx". But how is stunnel config for "connect x.x.x.x:443" that it connect to the right server in internet I specified in IE address line? Can someone give me a hint? Or impossible? Thanks a lot Thomas

2 1

Connection setup for STARTTLS vs. SSL/TLS for POP3/SMTP mail servers?
by Ben Stover 20 Oct '17

20 Oct '17

In stunnels *.conf file I can specify the mail server name and the port for a connection. How can I tell stunnel to use STARTTLS as connect type? How can I tell stunnel to use SSL/TLS as connect type? Does stunnel support both connect types at all or only one? Is the connect type for SMTP completely determined by port e.g.: STARTTLS over port 587 and SSL/TLS over port 465 or can both connect types use both ports? Assume I do not get the supported connect type information from my webhoster: How can I find it out from my (client) side? What are there error messages? Ben

2 1

Stunnel on Android 7.x not working?
by John Appleseed 14 Oct '17

14 Oct '17

Hello, I have trouble with stunnel on Android 7.x.. I'm trying to connect to OpenVPN server through SSL tunneling with stunnel. On phone I'm using stunnel installed in Termux and OpenVPN. Everything is correctly configured, Im using the same config on other devices in same network and it works perfectly. I tried it with different devices with Android 7.x and it is not working at all :( Immediately after succesful connection I am receiving: TLS fd: Software caused connection abort (103) TLS socket closed (SSL_read) And it is still reconnecting again and again with the same error. I also tried it with stunnel downloaded directly from stunnel.org site.. Anyone with new Android who have working stunnel? Where can be the problem? Example stunnel.conf on Android: socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = debug [openvpn] client = yes accept = 1337 connect = *****.ddns.net:993 cert = /path/to/stunnel.pem and on server: chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4 pid = /stunnel.pid output = /stunnel.log setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [openvpn] client = no accept = 993 connect = 127.0.0.1:1194 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem Example stunnel.log is in attachment. Thank you very much

1 0

No certificate or private key specified
by Hugo Darley 12 Oct '17

12 Oct '17

Hi, After overcoming some initial more obvious problems I have still been unable to get this client's stunnel configured correctly. "No certificate or private key specified" - is this significant? Stunnel.conf looks like the below: debug = 2 output = stunnel.log CAfile=.\ca-verisign.crt client=yes verify=0 sslVersion = TLSv1.2 options = NO_SSLv2 options = NO_SSLv3 [TRD] accept=16002 connect= our.ip.com:443 [INV] accept=16003 connect= our.ip.com:443 Stunnel output log below 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: FD=276 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: FD=284 ifds=r-x ofds=--- 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Processing SIGNAL_RELOAD_CONFIG 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Running on Windows 6.1 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG5[main]: Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG5[main]: UTF-8 byte order mark detected 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG5[main]: FIPS mode disabled 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Compression disabled 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: PRNG seeded successfully 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG6[main]: Initializing service [TRD] 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Ciphers: HIGH:!DH:!aNULL:!SSLv2 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: TLS options: 0x03000004 (+0x03000000, -0x00000000) 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: No certificate or private key specified 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG4[main]: Service [TRD] needs authentication to prevent MITM attacks 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG6[main]: Initializing service [INV] 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Ciphers: HIGH:!DH:!aNULL:!SSLv2 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: TLS options: 0x03000004 (+0x03000000, -0x00000000) 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: No certificate or private key specified 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG4[main]: Service [INV] needs authentication to prevent MITM attacks 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG5[main]: Configuration successful 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Closing service [TRD] 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Service [TRD] closed (FD=284) 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Service [TRD] closed 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Closing service [INV] 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Service [INV] closed (FD=276) 2017.10.12 10:53:22 LOG7[main]: Service [INV] closed We tried giving the certification a hard location but still it seems unable to find it. Is there anything in the cfg you can see missing? Bearing in mind this is standard cfg for our clients connecting in. Kind regards, Hugo Darley The information contained in and accompanying this communication is strictly confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its content to anyone. MarketAxess reserves the right to monitor the content of emails sent to or from its systems. Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of MarketAxess. For more information, please visit www.marketaxess.com. MarketAxess Europe Limited is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, registered in England no. 4017610, registered office at 5 Aldermanbury Square, London EC2V 7HR. Telephone (020) 7709 3100. MarketAxess Corporation is regulated in the USA by the SEC and FINRA, incorporated in Delaware, executive offices at 299 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10171. Telephone (1) 212 813 6000.

1 0

OpenService: Error 1060: The specified service does not exist as an installed service.
by Hugo Darley 09 Oct '17

09 Oct '17

User has recently installed v5.4.2 on a windows machine and gets this error: [cid:[email protected]] Downloaded the .exe file from the website, installed into a D: drive folder (not the C: program files x86 folder), edited the config file to what we have advised countless users in the past and added the verisign crt to the same folder. Has reinstalled a couple of times to no avail. I have searched on the net for help but nothing specific to STunnel. Can anyone advise? Many thanks Hugo The information contained in and accompanying this communication is strictly confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its content to anyone. MarketAxess reserves the right to monitor the content of emails sent to or from its systems. Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of MarketAxess. For more information, please visit www.marketaxess.com. MarketAxess Europe Limited is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, registered in England no. 4017610, registered office at 5 Aldermanbury Square, London EC2V 7HR. Telephone (020) 7709 3100. MarketAxess Corporation is regulated in the USA by the SEC and FINRA, incorporated in Delaware, executive offices at 299 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10171. Telephone (1) 212 813 6000.

1 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Need some info
by Heinsbroek, Peter 09 Oct '17

09 Oct '17

I know. I have a module that reads and writes the pin encrypted from/into a disk file. Till stunnel 5.38 it worked via engine_pkcs and now I try to build it into stunnel. I works ,but the only thing now is where to store the pin after decrypting it. __________________ With regards Peter Heinsbroek Tel. +31 (0)88 265 9869 -----Original Message----- From: stunnel-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Malgorzata Olszówka Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 3:03 PM To: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Need some info W dniu 05.10.2017 o 14:39, Heinsbroek, Peter pisze: > How can I get the pin info from the config file entry “engineCtrl = > PIN:12345” into a variable in the ctx.c source With regards, Peter > Heinsbroek SQL & Unix Administrator Hello Peter, This is an example pin to the SoftHSM token. Regards, Malgorzata Olszowka _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, Atos’ liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. On all offers and agreements under which Atos Nederland B.V. supplies goods and/or services of whatever nature, the Terms of Delivery from Atos Nederland B.V. exclusively apply. The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly submitted to you on your request.

1 0

Professional support agreement
by alper erbakan 07 Oct '17

07 Oct '17

Hi, I am trying to find a company that willing to glve professional support for stunnel Windows version. I tried to reach from stunnel.org e-mail addresses is not working. Would you please help? Best regards iPhone'umdan gönderildi

2 1

Comments on daily DH Parameters regeneration...
by Taed Wynnell 06 Oct '17

06 Oct '17

We've been experiencing pain due to the daily STunnel regeneration of the DH Parameters. On our single-core machines in the field, this process will use 100% of the CPU for possibly an extended time. This interferes with other tasks that the machine is intended for. What's odd is that this process time ranges wildly, ranging from as low as 3 seconds to 90 minutes, even on the same machine. We see this behavior on all (thousands) of our machines, now that we know what to look for (the "Cron jobs completed in" trace in stunnel.log). We now know that we can set the DH Parameters in the configuration file, and that's what we'll be doing going forward. (Unless someone has another idea to offer.) I'd like to suggest some ideas for the future since I've seen on the mailing list that there are others who have run into this issue: * If the DH Parameter regeneration would run at Idle priority instead of Normal priority, it would not be nearly as noticeable, in that the CPU usage would still be there, but it wouldn't impact other services. The recomputation may be done in a separate thread, if so, this is straight-forward. * If there were a configuration file parameter to specify the regeneration interval. It would default to 24 hours (which is the current behavior), but could be set to a longer interval, a shorter interval for extreme security, or even to never. STunnel would still regenerate at the time of the service starting, unless a fixed DH is found in the configuration file. If a fixed DH were specified in the configuration file, that would avoid the service start computation and the interval would default to never. If both a fixed DH and the interval were specified in the configuration file, it would use the specified interval and recompute only after that interval.

1 0

Need some info
by Heinsbroek, Peter 05 Oct '17

05 Oct '17

How can I get the pin info from the config file entry “engineCtrl = PIN:12345” into a variable in the ctx.c source With regards, Peter Heinsbroek SQL & Unix Administrator Tel. +31 (0)88 265 9869 Mob. +31 6 5375 3244 Werner von Siemensstraat 3 2712 PN Zoetermeer, Nederland Org. unit B&PS-BTN/NL-TS-PS Central Unit 04 Email peter.heinsbroek(a)atos.net<mailto:[email protected]> Web www.nl.atos.net<UrlBlockedError.aspx> Atos IT Solutions and Services B.V. Comm. Register The Hague no. 27380688 This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s), and may not be forwarded or made available for use to any person other than the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender thereof and destroy/delete the message. The sender disclaims any liability as regards (the content of) this e-mail. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, Atos’ liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. On all offers and agreements under which Atos Nederland B.V. supplies goods and/or services of whatever nature, the Terms of Delivery from Atos Nederland B.V. exclusively apply. The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly submitted to you on your request.

1 0

Using Chrome directly as an STunnel Client to connect to an STunnel Server
by Dipen Doshi 05 Oct '17

05 Oct '17

Hello, I am new to STunnel and I am running into a problem. Here is my setup. I use an ASUS router with Merlin firmware. I have STunnel installed via Entware on this router. Running "stunnel -version" gives me: stunnel 5.41 on mipsel-openwrt-linux-gnu platform Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.2k 26 Jan 2017 Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI Global options: RNDbytes = 64 RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options: ciphers = FIPS (with "fips = yes") ciphers = HIGH:!DH:!aNULL:!SSLv2 (with "fips = no") curve = prime256v1 debug = daemon.notice logId = sequential options = NO_SSLv2 options = NO_SSLv3 sessionCacheSize = 1000 sessionCacheTimeout = 300 seconds stack = 65536 bytes TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I use my own server certificate signed by my own CA. This cert has the proper SANs with correct DNS/IP entries. I use this server certificate both for my router's HTTPS web gui and for the "cert" and "key" files listed in the config file below. Also, the "CAfile" in the config is pointing to my Root CA's certificate. My Root CA is also imported in my Windows box's certificate store. I can directly access my router's web gui from LAN side via these ports: 80 (HTTP), 2000 (HTTPS). Router's LAN subnet is 10.49.49.0/24 and the router's WAN IP is 10.76.5.3 (it is double NAT for testing, this router is for testing) Also, STunnel is running as a server accepting connections on port 443 (all interfaces) on the router. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I want to use Chrome directly as an STunnel client on my Windows box. So, I don't run STunnel on my Windows box in the client mode. SITUATION 1: WORKS FINE!! -- PURPOSE: Use Chrome to connect to "https://WAN_IP:443" This should forward to the router's port 80 (HTTP protocol used). My STunnel config file on the router has: setuid = nobody setgid = nobody foreground foreground = yes syslog = yes debug = 7 [Test-Service] accept = 443 connect = 10.49.49.1:80 requireCert = yes verifyChain = yes CAfile = /mnt/Merlin/entware/etc/stunnel/ca.crt cert = /mnt/Merlin/entware/etc/stunnel/server.crt key = /mnt/Merlin/entware/etc/stunnel/server.key SITUATION 2: DOES NOT WORK!! -- PURPOSE: Use Chrome to connect to "https://WAN_IP:443" This should forward to the router's port 2000 (HTTPS protocol used). There is only one change from the Situation 1 config file. The line for "connect" changed to "connect = 10.49.49.1:2000) This does not work. Note that I can directly access my router's web gui over https with "https://LAN_IP:2000" via Chrome, with no warnings. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ My thoughts: So, my current path is Chrome (Acting as STunnel Client) --> STunnel Server (on the router) --> Router's Web GUI. The "Chrome --> STunnel" Server connection is fine. Chrome prompts for private key and STunnel server correctly shows this incoming Chrome connection. The problem is the "STunnel Server --> Router" relay that uses HTTPS protocol. 1. STunnel does not like HTTPS to HTTPS relay. HTTP to HTTPS works, but not HTTPS to HTTPS. 2. STunnel server on my router is a client to my router's web gui. Is STunnel verifying the certificate of my router's HTTPS certificate? 3. If the above answer is yes, my guess is that STunnel sees a self signed certificate for this router and kills the connection? 4. How do I tell STunnel server to ignore certificate warnings for a remote connection, like when connecting to this router? 5. Or how do I explicitly tell STunnel to trust my Root CA while making this connection to my router? I couldn't find any options in STunnel for this. Regards, Dipen Doshi

2 3

Missing librairies
by Heinsbroek, Peter 26 Sep '17

26 Sep '17

I’m getting unresolved external symbol errors. I like to know what library I need for s_log. log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _stunnel_process_id referenced in function _log_id log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _stunnel_thread_id referenced in function _log_id log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _file_open referenced in function _log_open log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _file_close referenced in function _log_close log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _file_putline referenced in function _log_raw log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _tls_alloc referenced in function _s_log str.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _tls_alloc log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _tls_get referenced in function _s_log str.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _tls_get log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _ui_new_log referenced in function _log_raw log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _message_box referenced in function _fatal_debug log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _global_options referenced in function _log_open log.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _stunnel_locks referenced in function _log_close str.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _stunnel_locks str.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _num_clients referenced in function _leak_threshold str.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _number_of_sections referenced in function _str_leak_debug str.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _tls_initialized referenced in function _str_stats __________________ With regards Peter Heinsbroek Tel. +31 (0)88 265 9869 This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, Atos’ liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. On all offers and agreements under which Atos Nederland B.V. supplies goods and/or services of whatever nature, the Terms of Delivery from Atos Nederland B.V. exclusively apply. The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly submitted to you on your request.

1 0

Bug: Modifying configure.ac results in error
by Reschke, Sven (VWIF G-TS/P) 22 Sep '17

22 Sep '17

Hallo, I've encounter a problem when editing the configure.ac. I've upgraded to Stunnel 5.42, the problem wasn't existent with Stunnel 5.41. The normal operation is that "./configure" and "make" will run without an error. So far, so good. Now, if I edit the configure.ac, running again "./configure" and "make", "make" will report: CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh <path_to_stunnel_sources>/stunnel-5.42 /auto/missing aclocal-1.14 -I m4 cd . && /bin/sh <path_to_stunnel_sources>/stunnel-5.42 /auto/missing automake-1.14 --gnu CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh <path_to_stunnel_sources>/stunnel-5.42 /auto/missing autoconf configure.ac:4: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_NOTICE If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure.ac:23: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DEFINE make: *** [configure] Error 1 Here it doesn't matter what I change in configure.ac. Even the slightest modification results in the error. After some investigation, running "make" with "-d" showed that it will call auto/missing, because of the newer version of configure.ac. Comparing aclocal.m4 before and after calling "make" shows, that mainly the lines added between the version 5.41 and 5.42 are missing now (lines #23 - #741). As I'm not so familiar with the whole compile process, I found a simple hack, which solves the problem for the moment: Adding these missing lines to a new file named m4/acinclude.m4. After that, compiling, installing and running Stunnel works fine. Can someone verify? If you have questions, I'll try my best to answer them :) Best Regards, Sven Reschke Embedded System SW Developer G-TS/P

1 0

Help with connectivity issue
by Rob Allen 15 Sep '17

15 Sep '17

I’ve installed stunnel on an Amazon EC2 instance: stunnel 4.56 on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu platform Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013 Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 SSL:ENGINE,OCSP,FIPS Auth:LIBWRAP Global options: debug = daemon.notice pid = /var/run/stunnel.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options: ciphers = FIPS (with "fips = yes") ciphers = ALL:!SSLv2:!aNULL:!EXP:!LOW:-MEDIUM:RC4:+HIGH (with "fips = no") curve = prime256v1 sessionCacheSize = 1000 sessionCacheTimeout = 300 seconds sslVersion = TLSv1 (with "fips = yes") sslVersion = TLSv1 for client, all for server (with "fips = no") stack = 65536 bytes TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none I’ve created the stunnel.conf file: [smtp-tls-wrapper] accept = 2525 client = yes connect = email-smtp.us-west-2.amazonaws.com:465 protocol=smtp delay = yes I’ve tested the connection to SES (successfully) via openssl: [ec2-user@ip-172-31-4-68 ~]$ openssl s_client -quiet -crlf -connect email-smtp.us-west-2.amazonaws.com:465 depth=2 C = US, O = "VeriSign, Inc.", OU = VeriSign Trust Network, OU = "(c) 2006 VeriSign, Inc. - For authorized use only", CN = VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G5 verify return:1 depth=1 C = US, O = Symantec Corporation, OU = Symantec Trust Network, CN = Symantec Class 3 Secure Server CA - G4 verify return:1 depth=0 C = US, ST = Washington, L = Seattle, O = "Amazon.com, Inc.", CN = email-smtp.us-west-2.amazonaws.com verify return:1 220 email-smtp.amazonaws.com ESMTP SimpleEmailService-2370111491 wa7VtNk9b7c4TX0jNpdG But when I try to access through stunnel via localhost with telnet, I get this: [ec2-user@ip-172-31-4-68 ~]$ telnet localhost 2525 Trying ::1... telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. I’ve tried everything I can think of; I’ve read all the blogs and pages related to connecting from ec2 to SES via stunnel and I just can’t get it to work. Does anyone have any suggestions for other things I could try? Thanks in advance, Rob Allen, CPO Software Engineer | Eyefinity NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and destroy or delete this communication immediately.

2 2

Stunnel Config Error
by Jay Jenney 21 Aug '17

21 Aug '17

Trying to see why Stunnel like this config file (attached) for an office365 email account [cid:[email protected]] Harriscomputer Register today<http://www.harriscomputer.com/en/conference/> for HCTC2017 - Early Bird deadline is August 31! Jay Jenney Support Specialist P: 800-274-2911 x64272 F: E: jjenney(a)caliberpublicsafety.com [cid:Caliber_PS_left_CMYK_247aef3c-9961-4e6c-a9f4-053e52f0093f.jpg] , Iowa www.caliberpublicsafety.com<http://www.caliberpublicsafety.com> This message has been sent on behalf of a company that is part of the Harris Operating Group of Constellation Software Inc. These companies are listed at the following link: http://subscribe.harriscomputer.com Unsubscribe Option: If you do not wish to receive any future email, please unsubscribe by clicking on the following link:http://subscribe.harriscomputer.com This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.

1 0

stunnel w & w/o data compression
by Daniele Basaldella 18 Aug '17

18 Aug '17

Dear all, I use stunnel in clinet configuration to get data feeds from several sources. Until now none of them requested data compression, so the configuration was easy. Now I need to connect to a new data feeder that requires zlib compression. I found the compression method is a global setting, so it will be not compatible with current setup. The server runs Ubuntu 16.04LTS, ker 4.4.0.92.lowlatency, stunnel 5.30, openssl 1.0.2.g. I looked for a solution on internet but seems no one have my issue. Someone could suggest how to get both compressed/uncompressed data feed connections on same system. Thank you Best Regards Daniele

2 1

Timeout issue I think
by Ben Bazian 16 Aug '17

16 Aug '17

I have a legacy server that uses IMAP but does not support TLS. I am using stunnel and since implementation I am getting errors when an email has a larger attachment. My application process these attachments and when done (sometimes can take 5-10 minutes) it marks the message for deletion. When all messages are completed it purges the emails from the box. My app is throwing an error when it tries to delete the message (see below). I think it may be due to stunnel closing the connection to the server? Not quite sure. javax.mail.FolderClosedException at com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPMessage.getProtocol(IMAPMessage.java:105) at com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPMessage.loadEnvelope(IMAPMessage.java:941) at com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPMessage.getSubject(IMAPMessage.java:238) at com.softlinx.docurouter.source.email.EmailSourceConnector.processMess ages(EmailSourceConnector.java:1213) at com.softlinx.docurouter.source.email.EmailSourceConnector.process(Ema ilSourceConnector.java:1455) at com.softlinx.docurouter.source.email.EmailSourceConnector.main(EmailS ourceConnector.java:1622) My configuration is pretty simple. I saw somewhere that I could put a timeoutidle on the connector but that does not seem to help. Any ideas are appreciated. Here is the config. # Stunnel configuration file for Office 365 SMTP and POP3 # Author: MessageOps, www.messageops.com<http://www.messageops.com> # GLOBAL OPTIONS client = yes output = /etc/stunnel/stunnel-log.txt debug=3 # taskbar=yes # SERVICE-LEVEL OPTIONS [POP3 Incoming] accept = 110 connect = outlook.office365.com:995 timeoutidle = 14400 [SMTP Outgoing] protocol = smtp accept = 25 connect = outlook.office365.com:587 [IMAP] accept = 143 connect = outlook.office365.com:993 timeoutidle = 14400 Here is a printout of the global options. Global options: debug = daemon.notice pid = /var/run/stunnel.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options: ciphers = FIPS (with "fips = yes") ciphers = ALL:!SSLv2:!aNULL:!EXP:!LOW:-MEDIUM:RC4:+HIGH (with "fips = no") curve = prime256v1 sessionCacheSize = 1000 sessionCacheTimeout = 300 seconds sslVersion = TLSv1 (with "fips = yes") sslVersion = TLSv1 for client, all for server (with "fips = no") stack = 65536 bytes TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none -Ben

1 0

logging real client IP in Apache
by Stoyan Stoyanov 07 Jul '17

07 Jul '17

I have an Apache server serving only HTTP requests on port 80 and an stunnel daemon on the same server listening on port 443 and tunneling HTTPS requests to Apache. Is there a way for the client IP to be passed on to Apache so that I can capture and log that instead of the IP of stunnel, which in this case is 127.0.0.1? Ability to add a variable to the HTTP header would be perfect, but any other suggestions to solve this problem are welcome. Thanks! Stoyan

2 2

Error on startup of Stunnel
by Shelstone Lorde 30 Jun '17

30 Jun '17

I installed version 5.41, the latest version, on a Windows 10 Pro machine. I placed a link to the Stunnel.exe file in the Startup folder. I am getting the error "The ordinal 3253 could not be located in the dynamic link library c:\Users\...Programs\Startup\stunnel.exe". May be there has been a previous posting concerning this error but I have not been able to find it. Any help or suggestion will be appreciated. Thanks.

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel Connectivity Issue
by Ludolf Holzheid 13 Jun '17

13 Jun '17

On Tue, 2017-06-13 22:51:27 +0530, Dheeraj Gautam wrote: > Hi Browne, > > > > I am not understand like what config I have to do in stunnel config file. > > > > As per application it will trigger 8228 port of remote server, but at the momen stunnel is working only when I am trying to telnet localhost on 9233 port. > Dheeraj, I'm afraid you confused the directions: In you configuration file, you told Stunnel to accept connections on localhost, port 9233 ("accept = 127.0.0.1:9233"). Then, you told Stunnel, if such a connection is accepted, to connect to a remote server at port 8228 ("connect = 69.191.198.34:8228"). As long as both connections are established, Stunnel will forward data from localhost to 69.191.198.34 and vice versa, while encrypting the data in the localhost -> 69.191.198.34 direction and decrypting the data in the opposite direction (69.191.198.34 -> localhost). With this setup, a client program (such as Thunderbird) sends and receives plain-text data to/from a Stunnel instance on the same machine, while a server program on a remote machine (such as the Google mail server) sends and receives encrypted data to/from Stunnel. Is this about the setup you have in mind? Is your application server or client? Does it send and receive plain-text data or encrypted data? Ludolf -- Ludolf Holzheid Bihl+Wiedemann GmbH Floßwörthstraße 41 68199 Mannheim, Germany Tel: +49 621 33996-0 Fax: +49 621 3392239 mailto:[email protected] http://www.bihl-wiedemann.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: Mannheim Geschäftsführer: Jochen Bihl, Bernhard Wiedemann Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 5796

1 0

Configuring stunnel and openssl on Windows to support TLS 1.2
by Liz Turi 13 Jun '17

13 Jun '17

Good morning, I'm hoping you can help point me in the right direction. The problem I'm trying to solve is enabling TLS 1.2 connections on a Windows (environment has both Windows 2008 and Windows 10 environments) platform. Currently, my private keys are managed by the Windows certificate store, using the capi engineId within stunnel (v 5.41), which uses OpenSSL 1.0.1. Because of this, stunnel can only negotiate a TLS 1.1 connection. I've tried compiling OpenSSL 1.1.0f and stunnel 5.41, but no luck either cross compiling under CentOS, nor under Windows using either MSYS2/MINGW32 or Cygwin. What I'm looking for is any one of the following 1) solid current cross-compiling examples or references 2) solid current Windows compiling examples or references using extant versions 3) a way to manage the pfx/p12 (private key) in stunnel without resorting to the Windows certificate store. Option 3 is preferred. I see how to manage pkcs11, but not pkcs12. Thank you in advance! Liz Turi Sr. Consultant Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative 860 Winter Street, Waltham, MA 02451 (m) 339-222-6614 (o) 781-907-7204 (f) 781-207-8589 www.maehc.org<http://www.maehc.org> [fb_icon]<https://www.facebook.com/massachusettsehealthcollab?fref=nf>[li_icon]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/massachusetts-ehealth-collaborative?trk=ty…>[tw_icon]<https://twitter.com/MAeHC_org> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this email transmission is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email transmission in error, please notify us immediately. Thank you.

1 1

Memleak sTunnel Win32 5.41 ?
by Dod 12 Jun '17

12 Jun '17

Hello, I just noticed that stunnel memory usage is growing slowly but surely using 5.41 on Win7 64 Bits. Using a few POP3 SSL tunnels. Now it is using 290MB memory I don't know if it is since 5.41 (didn't pay attention). Is there a way to trace/log something that could be useful ? (apart from the process memory usage curve that I guess will not help). regards.

1 0

TLS-SRP patch
by Kevin Sheldrake 06 Jun '17

06 Jun '17

Hello I recently produced a patch that permits use of TLS-SRP; it is based on the TLS-PSK code and this blog post: https://matthewarcus.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/srp-in-openssl/ It’s not the cleanest of code but it does work as a POC. The patch is available here: https://github.com/rtfcode/tls-srp The README.txt provides some info on testing the patch and how it might be used to help dev web browsers and servers that support TLS-SRP (for IoT work). There is a page on the forthcoming OWASP Summit ‘TLS for Local IoT’ workshop (for which it was developed) at: https://owaspsummit.org/Working-Sessions/IoT/TLS-for-Local-IoT.html In terms of using TLS-SRP support in stunnel as a proxy, it might be useful as a replacement for TLS-PSK where the credentials are user-memorable (pass phrase, for example) as TLS-SRP has lower entropy requirements than TLS-PSK. For example, the creds could be stored in the user’s head rather than in a file and be less open to compromise if a device was seized. I don’t know if that’s useful for anyone; it’s just a thought. Thanks Kev

1 0

Connect to sub-directory path
by Shamim Uz Zaman 25 May '17

25 May '17

Hi Looking for an example to connect to subdirectory path such that [connect] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:441 connect = xxx.website.com:443/Connect/topath verifyChain = yes verifyPeer=yes CAfile = ca-certs.pem checkHost = xxx.mywebsite.com OCSPaia = yes When I only use xxx.mywebsite.com:443 it works. However, below three url gives TCP error (Unknown TCP service) xxx.mywebsite.com:443/Connect/topath xxx.mywebsite.com/Connect/topath https://xxx.mywebsite.com/Connect/topath My proxy connection requires to translate to the directory path of the domain. Regards, *Shamim Zaman*

2 1

Stunnel Connectivity Issue
by Dheeraj Gautam 24 May '17

24 May '17

Hi Team, We are using 5.41 release of Stunnel software to establish TCP connection with remote server using by TLSV1.2 protocol. Enclosed configuration file wherein we are trying to establish TCP connection with one my server along with provided certificate and key which are pointed in config file. Could you please let us know what parameters we are missing here due to which connection is not establishing with remote server. Although, stunnel logs indicating that configuration successful, but in logs no where is mentioned about the connection is it connected or not, below is the artifact for your easy ref. Could you please help us here to resolve this issue. Regards, Dheeraj Gautam -- www.arborfs.com This e-mail and any attachment are confidential and contain proprietary information, some or all of which may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the author immediately by telephone or by replying to this e-mail, and then delete all copies of the e-mail on your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this e-mail and any attachment has been checked for viruses, we cannot guarantee that they are virus free and we cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software viruses. We would advise that you carry out your own virus checks, especially before opening an attachment.

1 0

Stunnel on Suse 8.1, connections refused, pid remains
by InvalidPath 09 May '17

09 May '17

So I have this server, I can start stunnel via /etc/rc.d/stunnel start. The pid is there as witnessed by ps -aux | grep stunnel, I have 4 customers that access this server. The customers pull data files that contain certain client records. Anyway my test user connects to the server and is able to pull a handful of files before their process begins timing out. When this happens I can no longer SSH to the host without restarting stunnel. Weird thing is, is that I can see the pid still running when this happens. I have the debug = 7 but the log files according to stunnel - version is set to a level of 5. No clue where it''s getting a 5 from. But I am unable to determine why or what is causing this. And it's starting to cost the company lost revenue. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Ben

1 0

Graceful config reload when -fd option was used
by z a 09 May '17

09 May '17

Hi, Since version 4.30, sending a HUP signal to a running stunnel process will cause it to gracefully reload with the given config file. Is there a way to accomplish this when the running stunnel process was started with the "-fd" flag as in the example below? cat foo.conf | stunnel-fd 0 I tried writing to /proc/$pid/fd/0 but that didn't work. I'm hoping someone here has overcome this issue and might be able to whisper a hint in my direction. I am on Centos 7.2. Thanks

1 0

Trouble with stunnel.conf (version 5.41)
by Mark Garciano 02 May '17

02 May '17

Hi Stunnel users, Any ideas why I get a "server down" message"? Below is the conf file: ;--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ; ************************************************************************** ; * Global options * ; ************************************************************************** ; ; Debugging stuff (may useful for troubleshooting) debug = 7 output = stunnel.log ;Disable FIPS mode to allow non-approved protocols and algorithms fips = no ;************************************************************************** ; * Service defaults may also be specified in individual service sections * ; ************************************************************************** ; Disable support for insecure SSLv2 protocol options = NO_SSLv2 key = stunnel.pem cert = stunnel.pem client = yes accept = 5001 connect = XXXXXXXXXXX.com:6443 TIMEOUTclose = 0 TIMEOUTconnect = 200 TIMEOUTidle = 86400 ;--------------------------------------------------------------------------- HERE IS THE LOG WINDOW MESSAGE: [!] Server is down [ ] Running on Windows 6.1 [.] Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf [.] UTF-8 byte order mark detected [.] FIPS mode disabled [ ] Compression disabled [ ] Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd [ ] Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd [ ] PRNG seeded successfully [ ] Initializing inetd mode configuration [!] Service [(null)]: 'accept' option is only allowed in a [section] Mark Garciano Systems Programmer II USC Libraries Integrated Library Systems 213-740-3568

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in client mode to connect webservice in mutual authentication
by Chokkalingam, Jothish 28 Apr '17

28 Apr '17

Hi Can you help in sorting it out below scenario We have a URL whose TLS is 1.0 and now it is being upgraded to 1.2. Since the current application doesn't support V1.0 I am planning to use stunnel in between to fix the gap. Can you help if my below config is correct or not. The communication between client and server is MASSL(mutual authentication SSL) [Billpay46200] client = yes CApath = /apps/bss/CCBTrustStore-->trust store where the remote webservice certificates are stored in cert format accept = 46200-->port configured from client machine to connect using http connect = xxx.in.xxx.com.au:46200-->port where the incoming http request need to be changed from http to https cert = /stunnel/bin/client.pem-->identity certificate used for client key = /stunnel/bin/key.pem-->corresponding key for the above identity certificate. While hitting using the URL http://localhost:46200 it is shown in stunnel log as below 2017.04.28 17:17:51 LOG5[2627:3]: Billpay46200 accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:58382 2017.04.28 17:17:51 LOG5[2627:3]: Billpay46200 connected remote server from 10.116.194.24:58383 2017.04.28 17:17:51 LOG3[2627:3]: SSL_connect: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.04.28 17:17:51 LOG5[2627:3]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket Thanks and Regards, Jothish TIBCO TSD Ph. : +91 44 39263958 Mobile : +91 9884040171 Support : +91 9962007110 OC : jothish.chokkalingam Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com ________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. ______________________________________________________________________________________ www.accenture.com

1 0

Remove session callback
by Florian Gossin 19 Apr '17

19 Apr '17

Hi, I have updated to the latest 5.41 version. I was troubleshooting another problem and I discovered dozens of lines in the log file with "Remove session callback, Deallocating application specific data for session connect address": 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: Service [pgbouncer-client] started 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG5[17483]: Service [pgbouncer-client] accepted connection from x.x.x.x:36018 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG6[17483]: Peer certificate required 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: TLS state (accept): before/accept initialization 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: SNI: no virtual services defined 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3 write finished A 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: TLS state (accept): SSLv3 read finished A 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: Remove session callback 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: Remove session callback 2017.04.19 14:49:49 LOG7[17483]: Deallocating application specific data for session connect address ... Can anyone explain me what it is about ? Thank you, Florian

1 0

Windows Server 2012 stunnel service
by Adam Shackleton 18 Apr '17

18 Apr '17

Hi All I'm running stunnel on Windows Server 2012 R2 with the following config: [test-qa] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:8080 connect = webaddress.com:443 cert = API-q-response.pfx CAfile = ca-certs.pem OCSPaia = yes When I start the GUI I'm prompted for the certificate password then and then stunnel works fine, but I need it to run as a service. I've tried using the start menu stunnel Service Install button, I've also tried opening a command prompt in C:\Program Files (x86)\stunnel\config and running C:\Program Files (x86)\stunnel\bin\stunnel.exe -install, and I've also tried moving the config file and certs to the \bin directory and running stunnel -install there as well. In all case the service installs ok, and when you run it, it starts (I can see it in the services tool), you can click the stunnel Configuration File Reload button in the start menu and it says the configuration was successfully reloaded, but it doesn't work when I try to use it. I've noticed two things that might be relevant: 1. At no point does it prompt me for the certificate password like it does when I load the GUI 2. The dialog boxes that open when the service is installed or started say "stunnel 5.40 on Win32 (not configured) [cid:[email protected]] If anyone has any advice that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Adam

2 1

SOCKS connection to the IPv4 loopback rejected.
by Robert de Bath 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

Hi everyone, How do I get rid of this message? I have a stunnel server setup on a remote machine using the socks protocol. I use two keys plus the certificates and a private CA to protect the SSL link. On a local machine I have an stunnel client running without a protocol option set. If I try to make a socks connection to an interface IP of the remote server it works perfectly, bypassing the intervening firewalls through the protected tunnel. But the interface IP changes and I only want to allow connections to the remote server through the tunnel. I could setup traditional tunnels, but while one of the services (remote desktop to the Windows server) is constant the others are dynamically configurable. I have even considered using SNI to distinguish the incoming connections to the various services but while this allows there to be just one tunnel port it will still need a remote reconfiguration of stunnel every time a service port is added or removed. The best way to express this limit is that the socks server should ONLY connect to localhost; but it's "rejected". In actual operation I will probably need to allow the local network too which will probably be an rfc1597 address. Looking at the source it appears that this condition is hard coded into the "validate" function so my question becomes: can you please remove this or add a flag to turn it off? -- Robert de Bath robert(a)tvisiontech.co.uk

1 0

Configure Error
by Kenway Ng 12 Apr '17

12 Apr '17

Hi I am running into an issue when I go into the src directory and I run the configure command, I get configure: error: Could not find your TLS library installation dir Use --with-ssl option to fix this problem I am trying to upgrade our version of stunnel. Our SME left and now I am trying to upgrade stunnel to fix a vulnerability . I am being told to use TLS1.1 or higher Here is our current version of stunnel $ ./stunnel -version stunnel 4.15 on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008 Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP Any help would be appreciated. Kenway

1 0

PSK, verifying the client
by Mike 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

Is it possible to verify the client using PSK? On the stunnel server I specify a PSKsecrets file with two lines in it, one for client01 and one for client02. The secret is about 36 characters long. On a client, I have a similar PSKsecrets file, but only containing the client01 line. Now, if I try to connect with, say, a client03, i.e., any client that does not have a matching line in the server's PSKsecrets file, how can I assure that the client connection will be rejected? What I'd like to see would be the following: any client that tries to connect, and does not present a PSK that is present in the server's PSKsecrets file, then that client's connection request is rejected, with an appropriate message logged. Can I do that with the current stunnel? thx.

1 0

Scan to email failure: RapbianPi3 to Office365
by Graeme Ellisson 03 Apr '17

03 Apr '17

Hi. I recently bought a Pi3 and have loaded Raspbian with Doobs (Previously I had this running faultlessly under a Windows Server for my Canon multi function printer that does not support SSL/TLS but only authentication). After about 8 attempts to get Stunnel4 working (there doesn't seem to be a later version to install via the command line) I eventually found that Stunnel4 works fine as long as one doesn't update Dabian from the initial Doobs install. So, I now have the service running and listening on port 25 with the following config file: debug=7 output=/etc/stunnel/stunnel.log client=yes options=NO_SSLv2 (I added this last night after reading a blog) [SMTP OUT] sslVersion=TLSv1 (I added this last night after reading a blog) protocol=smtp accept=25 connect=smtp.office365.com:587 On restarting the service I see the following which looks okay to my untrained eye: 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3570]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3570]: Processing SIGNAL_TERMINATE 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3570]: Terminated 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3570]: Closing service [SMTP OUT] 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3570]: Service [SMTP OUT] closed (FD=7) 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3570]: Service [SMTP OUT] closed 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3570]: removing pid file /var/run/stunnel4.pid 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: Clients allowed=500 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3926]: stunnel 5.06 on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf platform 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3926]: Compiled with OpenSSL 1.0.1k 8 Jan 2015 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3926]: Running with OpenSSL 1.0.1t 3 May 2016 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3926]: Update OpenSSL shared libraries or rebuild stunnel 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3926]: Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6,SYSTEMD SSL:ENGINE,OCSP,FIPS Auth:LIB$ 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: errno: (*__errno_location ()) 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3926]: Reading configuration from file /etc/stunnel/stunnel4.conf 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3926]: FIPS mode disabled 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: Compression disabled 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /dev/urandom 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: PRNG seeded successfully 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG6[3926]: Initializing service [SMTP OUT] 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: No private key specified 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: SSL options: 0x03000004 (+0x03000000, -0x00000000) 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG5[3926]: Configuration successful 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: Listening file descriptor created (FD=7) 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3926]: Service [SMTP OUT] (FD=7) bound to 0.0.0.0:25 2017.04.03 09:42:09 LOG7[3927]: Created pid file /var/run/stunnel4.pid When sending a scan from the printer to an email address I see the following in the log file: 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3927]: Service [SMTP OUT] accepted (FD=3) from 192.168.8.99:1085 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: Service [SMTP OUT] started 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG5[3960]: Service [SMTP OUT] accepted connection from 192.168.8.99:1085 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG6[3960]: s_connect: connecting 40.101.73.162:587 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 40.101.73.162:587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG5[3960]: s_connect: connected 40.101.73.162:587 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG5[3960]: Service [SMTP OUT] connected remote server from 192.168.8.33:59792 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: Remote socket (FD=9) initialized 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 220 DB6PR07CA0179.outlook.office365.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service $ 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: -> 220 DB6PR07CA0179.outlook.office365.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service $ 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: -> EHLO localhost 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-DB6PR07CA0179.outlook.office365.com Hello [46.208.253.189] 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-SIZE 157286400 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-PIPELINING 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-DSN 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-STARTTLS 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-8BITMIME 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-BINARYMIME 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250-CHUNKING 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 250 SMTPUTF8 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: -> STARTTLS 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: <- 220 2.0.0 SMTP server ready 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG6[3960]: SNI: sending servername: outlook.office365.com 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 items in the session cache 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 2 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 2 client connects that finished 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 server connects that finished 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 session cache hits 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 external session cache hits 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 session cache misses 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG7[3960]: 0 session cache timeouts 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG6[3960]: SSL connected: new session negotiated 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG6[3960]: Negotiated TLSv1 ciphersuite ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128-bit encryption) 2017.04.03 10:00:05 LOG6[3960]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2017.04.03 10:00:10 LOG6[3960]: SSL socket closed (SSL_read) 2017.04.03 10:00:10 LOG7[3960]: Sent socket write shutdown 2017.04.03 10:00:10 LOG5[3960]: Connection closed: 23 byte(s) sent to SSL, 79 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.04.03 10:00:10 LOG7[3960]: Remote socket (FD=9) closed 2017.04.03 10:00:10 LOG7[3960]: Local socket (FD=3) closed 2017.04.03 10:00:10 LOG7[3960]: Service [SMTP OUT] finished (0 left) 2017.04.03 10:00:20 LOG7[3927]: Service [SMTP OUT] accepted (FD=3) from 192.168.8.99:1086 2017.04.03 10:00:20 LOG7[3961]: Service [SMTP OUT] started 2017.04.03 10:00:20 LOG5[3961]: Service [SMTP OUT] accepted connection from 192.168.8.99:1086 2017.04.03 10:00:20 LOG6[3961]: s_connect: connecting 40.101.72.194:587 2017.04.03 10:00:20 LOG7[3961]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 40.101.72.194:587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.04.03 10:00:20 LOG5[3961]: s_connect: connected 40.101.72.194:587 2017.04.03 10:00:20 LOG5[3961]: Service [SMTP OUT] connected remote serve from 192.168.8.33:57422 2017.04.03 10:00:20 LOG7[3961]: Remote socket (FD=9) initialized 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 220 DB6PR07CA0014.outlook.office365.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service $ 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: -> 220 DB6PR07CA0014.outlook.office365.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service $ 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: -> EHLO localhost 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-DB6PR07CA0014.outlook.office365.com Hello [46.208.253.189] 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-SIZE 157286400 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-PIPELINING 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-DSN 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-STARTTLS 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-8BITMIME 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-BINARYMIME 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250-CHUNKING 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 250 SMTPUTF8 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: -> STARTTLS 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: <- 220 2.0.0 SMTP server ready 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG6[3961]: SNI: sending servername: outlook.office365.com 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: SSL state (connect): unknown state 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 items in the session cache 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 3 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 3 client connects that finished 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 server connects that finished 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 session cache hits 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 external session cache hits 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 session cache misses 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG7[3961]: 0 session cache timeouts 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG6[3961]: SSL connected: new session negotiated 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG6[3961]: Negotiated TLSv1 ciphersuite ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128-bit encryption) 2017.04.03 10:00:21 LOG6[3961]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2017.04.03 10:00:26 LOG6[3961]: SSL socket closed (SSL_read) 2017.04.03 10:00:26 LOG7[3961]: Sent socket write shutdown 2017.04.03 10:00:26 LOG5[3961]: Connection closed: 23 byte(s) sent to SSL, 79 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.04.03 10:00:26 LOG7[3961]: Remote socket (FD=9) closed 2017.04.03 10:00:26 LOG7[3961]: Local socket (FD=3) closed 2017.04.03 10:00:26 LOG7[3961]: Service [SMTP OUT] finished (0 left) At the end of this, no email is received. I can't tell from the above if the document is not being received by Stunnel from the printer or if Stunnel can not pass the document to Office365. It looks like TLSv1 is being negotiated and some data is being sent but then it closes the connection. Any help would be much appreciated. Regards, Graeme

2 1

Stunnel Version Vulnerability-Currently using 5.04
by Tracy Drake - IQGC-C 28 Mar '17

28 Mar '17

Hello Stunnel Users Forum! I wonder if anyone may have suggestions of what, if anything can be done to surmount a reported vulnerability for Stunnel versions prior to 5.34. I have limited savvy in this arena so please excuse this "Stunnel for Dummies" question. The following statements surfaced in a "security vulnerabilities" report... The version of stunnel installed on the remote host is 4.46 or later but prior to 5.34. It is, therefore, affected by a security bypass vulnerability related to the validation of level 4 peer certificates. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and/or availability. No other details are available. I am of the mind that perhaps an entry in Stunnel.conf until we can deploy an upgrade? Thanks in advance for any feedback! Upgrade to stunnel version 5.34 or later. -- Tracy Drake CSM Senior Consultant GSA-FAS CAMEO Contractor URSA & INFOConnect Support & Training Team Lead 704-987-1211 tracy.drake(a)gsa.gov

1 0

Multi source VPN connectivity
by Aykut SAY 24 Mar '17

24 Mar '17

Hi, We are working on a integration project and we need to connect our application to three different sources. These three sources have their own VPN. Can stunnel connect to three different vpn from one server? If yes, which version of stunnel we need to install to our server? Thanks, Aykut

1 0

stunnel public private key authentication like ssh
by Michael Power 23 Mar '17

23 Mar '17

Is there a way to configure stunnel just to check the public key of the provided certificate? I want authentication between the server and the client to take place by public key only, no PKI just like ssh. Is this possible? Is this verify level 4, or does that still check the CN against the host that I am connecting to? Michael Power

1 0

update stunnel with engine pkcs11
by Heinsbroek, Peter 20 Mar '17

20 Mar '17

Hallo, I’m a newbee in C programming. I have to upgrade stunnel 5.31 with engine_pkcs11 (0.1.8) for windows to the latest versions. (5.40 & 0.2.2) My engine_pkcs.c contains an subroutine my_get_pin (see attachment line 707) that reads a pin from a file in the windows folder. After reading it ,it transforms the pin to hexadecimal, if not already done, and writes it back in the file. After adjusting the new source it compiles without errors, but when executing it doesn’t work anymore. I also attached the old engine_pkcs11.c as we used it. Can someone help me with this problem. After compairing the old and new source I noticed that there have been major improvements to the source With regards, Peter Heinsbroek Application manager NT / SQL20xx Tel. +31 (0)88 265 9869 Mob. +31 6 5375 3244 Werner von Siemensstraat 3 2712 PN Zoetermeer, Nederland Org. unit PS Central Fin Services Unit 02 SI NL Email peter.heinsbroek(a)atos.net<mailto:[email protected]> Web www.nl.atos.net<UrlBlockedError.aspx> Atos IT Solutions and Services B.V. Comm. Register The Hague no. 27380688 This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s), and may not be forwarded or made available for use to any person other than the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender thereof and destroy/delete the message. The sender disclaims any liability as regards (the content of) this e-mail. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, Atos’ liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. On all offers and agreements under which Atos Nederland B.V. supplies goods and/or services of whatever nature, the Terms of Delivery from Atos Nederland B.V. exclusively apply. The Terms of Delivery shall be promptly submitted to you on your request.

1 0

Fwd: Stunnel Performance strangeness
by Scott McKeown 10 Mar '17

10 Mar '17

Hi All, We have been doing some throughput testing and are wondering of you can help explain some of the results we have been getting. We are trying to establish the maximum number of handshakes per second our appliances can do when using Stunnel. Our tests have been done on a 4 core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v5 @ 3.40GHz machine with 8Gb ram. Using stunnel 5.33 openssl 1.0.2j (We use stunnel 5.33 here, but this was also tested with stunnel 5.40 and we got the same issue) Stunnel was compiled with - ./configure --enable-fips --enable-ipv6 --with-threads=pthread --sysconfdir=/etc --with-ssl=/usr/src/built/OpenSSL_1_0_2j-no_march/usr/local/ --disable-libwrap --disable-systemd I was using a python script of my own design for load testing when I noticed the problem we then switched to an open source package called vegeta https://github.com/tsenart/vegeta the command I was using to run it was - echo "GET https://10.10.10.10:443" | ./vegeta attack -workers=30 -rate=3000 -duration=300s -insecure > test.out We are essentially seeing a degradation in throughput at a fixed point in time. I am seeing the problem when using 3000 transactions per second. We are doing https gets through stunnel to a http backend, 1 transaction is an ssl handshake the http get and waiting for the response. Interestingly if I try 5.06 it works fine I get a smooth constant loading. Please take a look at 30worker3000rate5.33-300s.png where you can see after about 55 seconds there is a jump in latency. I get the same issue if I run the test with 2000 transactions. Please see 30worker20005.33-700s.png but with the lower transaction rate the issue takes longer to rear its head. The issue doesnt happen if I run the test with 3000 transaction using 5.06. Please see 30worker3000rate5.06-300s.png >From looking at the graphs our thoughts were that we were hitting some sort of cache limit and used that as a starting point. We have taken a look at the code changes between versions we know were working and the problematic version and the main thing that stands out is the changes to the leak detection. Previously this was partially based on the number of clients but has been changed to use the sections. This led to the decision to try a different limit value and found the number of connections we saw before seeing an issue corresponds to the change of the limit value. We think we have identified the code that is causing the problem/doing something funny it was added in 5.33 NOEXPORT long leak_threshold() { long limit; limit=10000*((int)number_of_sections+1); #ifndef USE_FORK limit+=100*num_clients; #endif return limit; } its src/str.c when increasing the limit number so limit=10000*((int)number_of_sections+1) to limit=20000*((int)number_of_sections+1) This still results in an increase in response time but at a later time in the test, please see 30worker3000rate5.33-ben-highlimit.png Interestingly once I end up in this state I am stuck with high latencies until I restart stunnel. (The box I am testing on was left over night to make sure its not any hanging tcp connections or anything like that) I must admit we are at the limit of our C understanding and your imput would be welcomed. -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org http://www.loadbalancer.org Tel (UK) - +44 (0) 3303801064 <0330%20380%201064> (24x7) Tel (US) - +1 888.867.9504 <+1%20888-867-9504> (Toll Free)(24x7)

1 0

Segfault after connecting
by Andrew Culver 23 Feb '17

23 Feb '17

I had my stunnel instance working as expected last week. Since then I've moved the server behind a load balancer, which is doing regular health checks (opens a tcp connection, then disconnects) to see that stunnel is up. I don't believe the health checks are a problem, but they're the only change I've made since I had stunnel working. I can see the health checks connecting and disconnecting. However when I open a new connection, either by telnet or by: openssl s_client -connect mtar.uwo.ca:587 -starttls smtp ... stunnel says it fails to verify the server certificate, then seg faults. I'm running stunnel 5.40 and I'm having the same problem on 2 different servers running openssl 1.1.0d and 1.1.0e. Here's my config: [root@mtar1 stunnel]# egrep -v '^;|^ *$' stunnel.conf ; Sample stunnel configuration file for Unix by Michal Trojnara 2002-2017 setuid = stunnel setgid = stunnel pid = /usr/local/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid foreground = yes debug = debug [uwo2local] accept = 587 cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/mtar-withprivatekey.pem connect = 20587 protocol = smtp [local2o365] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:20587 connect = smtp.office365.com:587 checkHost = smtp.office365.com verifyChain = yes CApath = /etc/ssl/certs OCSPaia = yes protocol = smtp Here's my debug log: The health checks are from 172.18.58.5 and my test connection which leads to the seg fault is from 129.100.6.17. [root@mtar1 stunnel]# /usr/local/bin/stunnel /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Clients allowed=500 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG5[ui]: stunnel 5.40 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu platform 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG5[ui]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.1.0d 26 Jan 2017 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG5[ui]: Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: errno: (*__errno_location ()) 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG5[ui]: Reading configuration from file /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG5[ui]: UTF-8 byte order mark detected 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG5[ui]: FIPS mode disabled 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Compression disabled 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: PRNG seeded successfully 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[cron]: Cron thread initialized 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG6[ui]: Initializing service [uwo2local] 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Ciphers: HIGH:!DH:!aNULL:!SSLv2 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: TLS options: 0x02020004 (+0x02000000, -0x00000000) 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG6[ui]: Loading certificate from file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/mtar-withprivatekey.pem 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG6[ui]: Certificate loaded from file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/mtar-withprivatekey.pem 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG6[ui]: Loading private key from file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/mtar-withprivatekey.pem 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG6[ui]: Private key loaded from file: /usr/local/etc/stunnel/mtar-withprivatekey.pem 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Private key check succeeded 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: DH initialization 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Could not load DH parameters from /usr/local/etc/stunnel/mtar-withprivatekey.pem 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG6[ui]: Using dynamic DH parameters 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: ECDH initialization 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: ECDH initialized with curve prime256v1 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG6[ui]: Initializing service [local2o365] 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Ciphers: HIGH:!DH:!aNULL:!SSLv2 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: TLS options: 0x02020004 (+0x02000000, -0x00000000) 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: No certificate or private key specified 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG5[ui]: Configuration successful 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Listening file descriptor created (FD=7) 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] (FD=7) bound to 0.0.0.0:587 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Listening file descriptor created (FD=8) 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] (FD=8) bound to 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG6[cron]: Executing cron jobs 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG5[cron]: Updating DH parameters 2017.02.23 11:28:48 LOG7[ui]: Created pid file /usr/local/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:40161 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG5[0]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:40161 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG6[0]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #0 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG6[0]: s_connect: connecting ::1:20587 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: s_connect: s_poll_wait ::1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG3[0]: s_connect: connect ::1:20587: Connection refused (111) 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG6[0]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG5[0]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG5[0]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33132 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG6[0]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG3[0]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG5[0]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[0]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33132 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[1]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG3[1]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG5[1]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[1]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:28:51 LOG7[1]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:19333 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG5[2]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:19333 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG6[2]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #1 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG6[2]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG5[2]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG5[2]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33134 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG6[2]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG3[2]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG5[2]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[2]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33134 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[3]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG3[3]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG5[3]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[3]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:28:56 LOG7[3]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:46315 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG5[4]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:46315 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG6[4]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #0 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG6[4]: s_connect: connecting ::1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: s_connect: s_poll_wait ::1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG3[4]: s_connect: connect ::1:20587: Connection refused (111) 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG6[4]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG5[4]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG5[4]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33138 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG6[4]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG3[4]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG5[4]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[4]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33138 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[5]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG3[5]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG5[5]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[5]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:01 LOG7[5]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:55003 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG5[6]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:55003 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG6[6]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #1 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG6[6]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG5[6]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG5[6]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33140 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG6[6]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG3[6]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG5[6]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[6]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33140 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[7]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG3[7]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG5[7]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[7]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:06 LOG7[7]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:52586 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG5[8]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:52586 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG6[8]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #0 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG6[8]: s_connect: connecting ::1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: s_connect: s_poll_wait ::1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG3[8]: s_connect: connect ::1:20587: Connection refused (111) 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG6[8]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG5[8]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG5[8]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33144 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG6[8]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG3[8]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG5[8]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[8]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33144 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[9]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG3[9]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG5[9]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[9]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:11 LOG7[9]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:60425 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG5[10]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:60425 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG6[10]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #1 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG6[10]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG5[10]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG5[10]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33146 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG6[10]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG3[10]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG5[10]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[10]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33146 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[11]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG3[11]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG5[11]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[11]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:16 LOG7[11]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:50381 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG5[12]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:50381 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG6[12]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #0 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG6[12]: s_connect: connecting ::1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: s_connect: s_poll_wait ::1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG3[12]: s_connect: connect ::1:20587: Connection refused (111) 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG6[12]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG5[12]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG5[12]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33150 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG6[12]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG3[12]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG5[12]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[12]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33150 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[13]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG3[13]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG5[13]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[13]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:21 LOG7[13]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:7384 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG5[14]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:7384 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG6[14]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #1 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG6[14]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG5[14]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG5[14]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33152 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG6[14]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG3[14]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG5[14]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[14]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33152 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[15]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG3[15]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG5[15]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[15]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:26 LOG7[15]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:40920 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG5[16]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:40920 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG6[16]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #0 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG6[16]: s_connect: connecting ::1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: s_connect: s_poll_wait ::1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG3[16]: s_connect: connect ::1:20587: Connection refused (111) 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG6[16]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG5[16]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG5[16]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33156 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG6[16]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG3[16]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG5[16]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[16]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33156 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[17]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG3[17]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG5[17]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[17]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:31 LOG7[17]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:23632 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG5[18]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:23632 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG6[18]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #1 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG6[18]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG5[18]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG5[18]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33158 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG6[18]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG3[18]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG5[18]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[18]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33158 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[19]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG3[19]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG5[19]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[19]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:36 LOG7[19]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:2134 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG5[20]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:2134 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG6[20]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #0 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG6[20]: s_connect: connecting ::1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: s_connect: s_poll_wait ::1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG3[20]: s_connect: connect ::1:20587: Connection refused (111) 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG6[20]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG5[20]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG5[20]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33162 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG6[20]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG3[20]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG5[20]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[20]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33162 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[21]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG3[21]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG5[21]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[21]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:41 LOG7[21]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:4464 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG5[22]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:4464 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG6[22]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #1 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG6[22]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG5[22]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG5[22]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33164 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG6[22]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG3[22]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG5[22]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[22]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33164 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[23]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG3[23]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG5[23]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[23]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:46 LOG7[23]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG5[cron]: DH parameters updated 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG6[cron]: Cron jobs completed in 63 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[cron]: Waiting 86337 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:28318 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG5[24]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:28318 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG6[24]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #0 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG6[24]: s_connect: connecting ::1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: s_connect: s_poll_wait ::1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG3[24]: s_connect: connect ::1:20587: Connection refused (111) 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG6[24]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG5[24]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG5[24]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33168 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG6[24]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG3[24]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG5[24]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[24]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33168 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[25]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG3[25]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG5[25]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[25]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:51 LOG7[25]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 172.18.58.5:32441 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG5[26]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 172.18.58.5:32441 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG6[26]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #1 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG6[26]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG5[26]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG5[26]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33170 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: RFC 2487 not detected 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG6[26]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: TLS state (accept): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG3[26]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG5[26]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[26]: Service [uwo2local] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33170 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[27]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG3[27]: getpeerbyname (local_rfd): Transport endpoint is not connected (107) 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG5[27]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[27]: Local descriptor (FD=3) closed 2017.02.23 11:29:56 LOG7[27]: Service [local2o365] finished (0 left) 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: Service [uwo2local] accepted (FD=3) from 129.100.6.17:16594 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: Service [uwo2local] started 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG5[28]: Service [uwo2local] accepted connection from 129.100.6.17:16594 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[28]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #0 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[28]: s_connect: connecting ::1:20587 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: s_connect: s_poll_wait ::1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG3[28]: s_connect: connect ::1:20587: Connection refused (111) 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[28]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:20587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG5[28]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:20587 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG5[28]: Service [uwo2local] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:33176 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: Remote descriptor (FD=9) initialized 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: Found 1 ready file descriptor(s) 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: FD=4 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: FD=7 events=0x2001 revents=0x0 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: FD=8 events=0x2001 revents=0x1 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[ui]: Service [local2o365] accepted (FD=10) from 127.0.0.1:33176 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: Service [local2o365] started 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG5[29]: Service [local2o365] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:33176 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[29]: failover: round-robin, starting at entry #13 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[29]: s_connect: connecting 2603:1036:405:4a::2:587 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG3[29]: s_connect: connect 2603:1036:405:4a::2:587: Network is unreachable (101) 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[29]: s_connect: connecting 2603:1036:3:11e::2:587 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG3[29]: s_connect: connect 2603:1036:3:11e::2:587: Network is unreachable (101) 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[29]: s_connect: connecting 2603:1036:404:56::2:587 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG3[29]: s_connect: connect 2603:1036:404:56::2:587: Network is unreachable (101) 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[29]: s_connect: connecting 40.97.132.210:587 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 40.97.132.210:587: waiting 10 seconds 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG5[29]: s_connect: connected 40.97.132.210:587 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG5[29]: Service [local2o365] connected remote server from 172.18.58.248:52538 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: Remote descriptor (FD=11) initialized 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 220 MWHPR2001CA0006.outlook.office365.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:30:00 +0000 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: -> 220 MWHPR2001CA0006.outlook.office365.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:30:00 +0000 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: -> EHLO localhost 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: RFC 2487 detected 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: <- 220 MWHPR2001CA0006.outlook.office365.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:30:00 +0000 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[28]: -> 220 MWHPR2001CA0006.outlook.office365.com stunnel for Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:30:00 +0000 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-MWHPR2001CA0006.outlook.office365.com Hello [129.100.1.192] 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-SIZE 157286400 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-PIPELINING 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-DSN 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-STARTTLS 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-8BITMIME 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-BINARYMIME 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250-CHUNKING 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 250 SMTPUTF8 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: -> STARTTLS 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: <- 220 2.0.0 SMTP server ready 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[29]: SNI: sending servername: smtp.office365.com 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG6[29]: Peer certificate required 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: TLS state (connect): before SSL initialization 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write client hello 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write client hello 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server hello 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: Verification started at depth=1: C=US, O=DigiCert Inc, CN=DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG4[29]: CERT: Pre-verification error: unable to get local issuer certificate 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG4[29]: Rejected by CERT at depth=1: C=US, O=DigiCert Inc, CN=DigiCert Cloud Services CA-1 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: Remove session callback 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: Deallocating application specific data for addr index 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: TLS alert (write): fatal: unknown CA 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG3[29]: SSL_connect: 1416F086: error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG5[29]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2017.02.23 11:30:00 LOG7[29]: Deallocating application specific data for addr index Segmentation fault [root@mtar1 stunnel]# *Andrew Culver* System Administrator Information Technology Services <https://www.uwo.ca/its> University of Western Ontario <https://www.uwo.ca> e: aculver(a)uwo.ca p: 519-661-2111 x80265 <15196612111,80265> cal: html <http://goo.gl/wVoDlo> | ics <http://goo.gl/ncUjV0>

1 0

Bad Magic
by Melzer, Jacob 21 Feb '17

21 Feb '17

I'm trying to do a proof of concept using Stunnel on AIX 6.1. Without stunnel I'd have: Telnet session -> listening service With stunnel, I want: telnet session -> stunnel client -[secure connection]--> Stunnel server -->listening service. The stunnel client seems to be working fine, but the stunnel server abends as soon as it receives a secure connection. Client: Accepts non-secure on port 33342. Forwards to secure socket 33343 stunnel stunnel.conf.2 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG5[ui]: stunnel 5.40 on powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0 platform 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG5[ui]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG5[ui]: Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG5[ui]: Reading configuration from file /bmo/stunnel/bin/stunnel.conf.2 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG5[ui]: UTF-8 byte order mark detected 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG5[ui]: FIPS mode disabled 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG6[ui]: Initializing service [hif] 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG6[ui]: Loading certificate from file: /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG6[ui]: Certificate loaded from file: /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG6[ui]: Loading private key from file: /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG4[ui]: Insecure file permissions on /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG6[ui]: Private key loaded from file: /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG4[ui]: Service [hif] needs authentication to prevent MITM attacks 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG5[ui]: Configuration successful 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG5[0]: Service [hif] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:34749 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG6[0]: s_connect: connecting 127.0.0.1:33343 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG6[0]: s_connect: connected 127.0.0.1:33343 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG5[0]: Service [hif] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:34750 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG6[0]: SNI: sending servername: localhost 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG6[0]: Peer certificate not required 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG3[0]: SSL_connect: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG5[0]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket Server Accepts SSL connections on port 33343, connects to a non-secure service. stunnel stunnel.conf.1 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG5[ui]: stunnel 5.40 on powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0 platform 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG5[ui]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG5[ui]: Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG5[ui]: Reading configuration from file /bmo/stunnel/bin/stunnel.conf.1 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG5[ui]: UTF-8 byte order mark detected 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG5[ui]: FIPS mode disabled 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG6[ui]: Initializing service [hif] 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG6[ui]: Loading certificate from file: /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG6[ui]: Certificate loaded from file: /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG6[ui]: Loading private key from file: /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG4[ui]: Insecure file permissions on /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG6[ui]: Private key loaded from file: /bmo/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2017.02.21 09:31:25 LOG5[ui]: Configuration successful 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG5[0]: Service [hif] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:34750 2017.02.21 09:31:38 LOG6[0]: Peer certificate not required INTERNAL ERROR: Bad magic at OpenSSL, line 0 (this is an abend - core file gets created). log file exactly matches the standard output. Any idea what's going wrong here? dbx of the core file: tbs@netcbccadvwvr01 /bmo/hif/stunnel-5.40/src>dbx /bmo/stunnel/bin/stunnel core Type 'help' for help. [using memory image in core] reading symbolic information ... IOT/Abort trap in abort at 0xd01af1f8 ($t3) 0xd01af1f8 (abort+0xf8) 80410014 lwz r2,0x14(r1) (dbx) where abort() at 0xd01af1f8 fatal_debug(txt = "Bad magic", file = "OpenSSL", line = 0), line 359 in "log.c" get_alloc_list_ptr(ptr = 0x2007e1c8, file = "OpenSSL", line = 0), line 399 in "str.c" str_detach_debug(ptr = 0x2007e1c8, file = "OpenSSL", line = 0), line 348 in "str.c" str_free_debug(ptr = 0x2007e1c8, file = "OpenSSL", line = 0), line 383 in "str.c" free_function(ptr = 0x2007e1c8), line 191 in "tls.c" mem.CRYPTO_free() at 0xd97dd8d8 bn_lib.bn_expand2@AF37_5() at 0xd97e8da4 bn_mont.BN_mod_mul_montgomery() at 0xd981e150 ecp_mont.ec_GFp_mont_field_mul() at 0xd9837a18 ecp_smpl.ec_GFp_simple_point_get_affine_coordinates() at 0xd9839890 ec_lib.EC_POINT_get_affine_coordinates_GFp() at 0xd9a81dfc ecp_oct.ec_GFp_simple_point2oct() at 0xd9acc0d4 ec_oct.EC_POINT_point2oct() at 0xd9acb754 ssl3_send_server_key_exchange() at 0xd99e7c28 ssl3_accept() at 0xd99e9950 SSL_accept() at 0xd99c0b98 ssl23_get_client_hello() at 0xd9a003f4 ssl23_accept() at 0xd9a00c5c SSL_accept() at 0xd99c0b98 ssl_start(c = 0x20084cb8), line 431 in "client.c" client_try(c = 0x20084cb8), line 273 in "client.c" client_run(c = 0x20084cb8), line 181 in "client.c" client_main(c = 0x20084cb8), line 140 in "client.c" client_thread(arg = 0x20084cb8), line 99 in "client.c" (dbx) thread thread state-k wchan state-u k-tid mode held scope function $t1 run running 26279997 u no sys __fd_poll $t2 run running 45088879 u no sys _p_nsleep >$t3 run running 19070997 k no sys abort (dbx) list free_function 186 187 #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER<0x10100000L 188 NOEXPORT void free_function(void *ptr) { 189 /* CRYPTO_set_mem_ex_functions() needs a function rather than a macro */ 190 /* unfortunately, OpenSSL provides no file:line information here */ 191 str_free_debug(ptr, "OpenSSL", 0); 192 } 193 #endif 194 195 /* end of tls.c */ Should I be concerned that it looks like it is executing "free_function" from within an if statement "if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER<0x1010000L but my openssl version is 2017.02.21 09:31:35 LOG5[ui]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016 Troubleshooting so far: - I had the same problem with earlier versions of openssl. - I've tried this with 5.37 as well (based on Brian McGinity's post from a few days ago), but get the same error. Jacob

1 0

stunnel on Windows Client: Changing active network interface (wired, wireless)
by b.koch.kemper 17 Feb '17

17 Feb '17

Dear stunnel community, we are running an application on our windows clients. The application needs a remote connection to our server (linux) for remote function calls. We could successfully secure this connection via stunnel. However, when our windows users change their network connection (e.g. they disconnect their notebook from the docking station to our corporate wifi) the connection and hence the whole application breaks. The users actually have to restart stunnel to make the application work again, which is really inconvenient. As the application on the notebook is always using the same port, is it somehow possible to make stunnel establish a new connection using the new active network interface? Kind regards, Bernhard

1 0

RSA too big problem
by Vikrant Agarwal 16 Feb '17

16 Feb '17

Hi, I upgraded my Stunnel server machine to CentOS 6.8 and post upgrade , the stunnel too got upgraded to stunnel 4.29 on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013 . Now since then many of the stunnel client using newer stunnel client (those uses TLSv1.2 for Negotiation) are not able to connect . I get below error on the server in logs RSA_sign:digest too big for rsa key:rsa_sign’ How to fix this please? Regards, Vikrant

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] Problem with 5.40 and Peer suddenly disconnected
by Brian McGinity 08 Feb '17

08 Feb '17

I found the archives and downgraded to 5.37 and this fixed the problem. Before going this route I tried 5.40 and 5.41 beta and both had the same issues with 'Peer suddenly disconnected'. Strange that it this was only happening for one particular connection (1 out of 7). It would happen with every test. If you would like for me to beta test another version, I would be happy to try. Bran

1 0

Problem with 5.40 and Peer suddenly disconnected
by Brian McGinity 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

After updating to stunnel 5.40 on x86-pc-msvc-1500 platform, I am getting a Peer suddenly disconnected each time I post data to a particular url. [VISION_WEB] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:1935 connect = xx.xx.web.com:443 sslVersion = TLSv1 2017.02.07 16:30:08 LOG5[160]: Service [XX_WEB] accepted connection from 192.168.100.21:53507 2017.02.07 16:30:08 LOG5[160]: s_connect: connected 11.11.111.36:443 2017.02.07 16:30:08 LOG5[160]: Service [XX_WEB] connected remote server from 192.168.100.21:53508 2017.02.07 16:30:08 LOG3[160]: SSL_connect: Peer suddenly disconnected 2017.02.07 16:30:08 LOG5[160]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket This is a production issue and is causing a lot of problems for a lot of people and I need to do something quickly. Is it possible to download stunnel 5.37 installed to see if going back to this version will fix this issue? Where is it? Or does anyone possibly know why this might be happening? Thank you for your help. Brian

1 0

Default passthrough to different destination?
by Mark Boyce 03 Feb '17

03 Feb '17

Hi All Wondering if there’s a way to pass an unencrypted connections traffic to an alternative location if a client does not SSL/TLS with the stunnel server? So considering stunnel running as a server to wrap an unencrypted SMTP server. If the SMTP client/server talks SSL/TLS all is good and as expected. If the client tries to talk without encryption it gets disconnect. Is there any way to send this traffic elsewhere rather than disconnecting the client? So that stunnel is adding an SSL/TLS option to a service rather than enforcing it. Splitting the traffic to destination servers based on if the client was encrypted or not. Thoughts? Thanks Mark

2 3

Mixed cert/PSKsecrets & TLS/SSL before proxy
by Varda Zklir 02 Feb '17

02 Feb '17

Hello Gentlemen. Needs help in configuration or negative clarifications on two issues. 1) First question whether is mixed use of cert/PSKsecrets auth possible? The same method (ether cert or PSKsecrets explicitly) serverside trough the parent [TLS] and inherited services works properly. But mixed cert/PSKsecrets like in config snippet below doesn't work. [TLS] client = no accept = 0.0.0.0:https connect = localhost:http cert = /etc/opt/stunnel/stunnel.pem [ssh] client = no sni = TLS:ssh connect = localhost:ssh [socks] client = no sni = TLS:socks protocol = socks PSKsecrets = /etc/opt/stunnel/auth/passwd The idea is to pass insensibly all incorrect or non-SNI aware requests to main http server and hide other multiplexed services. And at the same time to establish encryption and password access control to [socks] service. 2) And the second question is it possible proxy CONNECT after establishing SSL/TLS encryption? The configuration section: [ssh] accept = 22222 protocol = connect protocolHost = server.tld:443 protocolUsername = usernamehere protocolPassword = passwordhere connect = proxy.tld:8080 Say to establish unencrypted connection with proxy, pass username and password, tell proxy to establish CONNECT to target 443 and then transmit SSL/TLS to it. Goal is if I have SSL/TLS termination server/proxy on port 443 so we at first speak SSL/TLS with proxy and only then proceed to proxy requests phase. Thanks for future explanations.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users