Hi
I have one little problem with stunnel .I saw your source and document very instresting .But I cant able to compile your souce code [Stunnel.org] in windows xp @ vc++ envirnment.and I have downloaded supportive compiler mingw ,openssl & libssl32.dll and libeay32.dll . In that source syslog.h is not supporting for vc++ . So kindly reply with Clear details to compile that source
Regds
Ramesh.k
Dear fwd,
> stunnel: md_rand.c:312: ssleay_rand_add: Assertion `md_c[1] ==
> md_count[1]'
> failed.
> 2004.10.03 10:14:44 LOG5[30267:1024]: Received signal 15; terminating
Your OpenSSL library is not properly compiled:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2003-April/000362.html
> # stunnel -version
> stunnel 4.05 on i686-pc-linux-gnu PTHREAD+LIBWRAP with OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30
> Sep
> 2003
You use an obsolete version of OpenSSL library. You should upgrade it.
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20040317.txt
Best regards,
Mike
Hi,
I have installed stunnel-4.05 along with openssl-0.9.7d. I am not
able to run it in either daemon or client mode. I read through the
stunnel.org webpage but could find any help.
when i run /usr/local/sbin/stunnel -d 7898 -r 631
i get the following output.
2004.09.24 15:10:47 LOG3[4752:1073866848]: -d: No such file or directory (2)
Syntax:
stunnel [filename] | -fd [n] | -help | -version | -sockets
filename - use specified config file instead of
/usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf
-fd n - read the config file from specified file descriptor
-help - get config file help
-version - display version and defaults
-sockets - display default socket options
I have copied the sampel config file as /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf.
what should i do to avoid this?
Is there any good document avalibel explaing step by step installation
and configuration of stunnel?
Thank you,
-Riyaz
Hi Guys,
I am trying to install stunnel-4.05 on Mac 10.2.8. I am following this
http://www.stepwise.com/Articles/Workbench/eart.4.0.html
article. I am up to Step 8: Testing your setup. The article is old, but I am
aware that stunnel 4.* requires a configuration file rather than command
line inputs. My config file is
[imapd]
accept = 993
exec = /usr/local/libexec/imapd
execargs = imaps
My problem is, when I run (taken from the article)
sudo stunnel -c -f -r localhost:993
I get the following, stunnel: command not found
Can I use command line arguments here? It seems to be a very non-specific
error. While hunting around for an answer I read somewhere else that stunnel
likes to die silently? So perhaps I am doing something wrong but getting a
vague error message? Is there a log file that I can look at?
Thank you for any help, it is appreciated and I hope I've provided
sufficient information.
Best Regards,
Robin
_________________________________________________________________
Find love today with ninemsn personals. Click here:
http://ninemsn.match.com?referrer=hotmailtagline
Hi Guys,
I am trying to install stunnel-4.05 on Mac 10.2.8. I am following this
http://www.stepwise.com/Articles/Workbench/eart.4.0.html
article. I am up to Step 8: Testing your setup. The article is old,
but I am aware that stunnel 4.* requires a configuration file rather
than command line inputs. My config file is
[imapd]
accept = 993
exec = /usr/local/libexec/imapd
execargs = imaps
My problem is, when I run (taken from the article)
sudo stunnel -c -f -r localhost:993
I get the following, stunnel: command not found
Can I use command line arguments here? It seems to be a very
non-specific error. While hunting around for an answer I read
somewhere else that stunnel likes to die silently? So perhaps I am
doing something wrong but getting a vague error message? Is there a
log file that I can look at?
Thank you for any help, it is appreciated and I hope I've provided
sufficient information.
Best Regards,
Robin
There's an example of rsync over stunnel at
http://www.stunnel.org/examples/rsync_mike.html
but it appears to be using stunnel 3 syntax. Has anyone
successfully made this work using stunnel 4?
right now /etc/stunnel.conf is same on client and server, has
[rsync]
accept = 2222
connect = 873
Steve Timm
------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525 timm(a)fnal.gov http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
Fermilab Computing Div/Core Support Services Dept./Scientific Computing Section
Assistant Group Leader, Farms and Clustered Systems Group
Lead of Computing Farms Team
When I start stunnel 4.05, I am presented with a dialog that requests
that I enter a pass phrase in order to access our private key. Is there
anyway to bypass this dialog. I would like to add the pass phrase to the
config file, so that the dialog isn't presented. Security isn't an
issue. Our config file will be in a secure location. Otherwise, our
operations people are going the have to know the pass phrase to start
stunnel.
Thanks for your help.
John
----------------------------------------------
John Bradley
Software Development
Lava Trading Inc.
95 Morton Street, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10014
Tel: 212.609.0162
Fax: 212.609.0101
www.lavatrading.com <http://www.lavatrading.com/>
This communication (including attachments) contains information that may
be confidential. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that
any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it (including, in any attachments) is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please
notify us by e-mail or by telephone 212-609-0162 and then delete the
e-mail and all attachments and any copies thereof.
I'm running stunnel 3.xx with thttpd (an embedded http server) on a small
embedded machine on a pci card running linux. Establishing ssh, ftp, and http
connections and using OpenSSL has all worked fine since they've been
installed. I've been experiencing a strange issue. It seems that stunnel
fails (somehow) to inform https clients that the connection has been closed.
The sequence of events that I'm observing goes like this:
T+0.0s: https client initiates request on port 443 (https).
T+0.1s: stunnel establishes connection with thttpd on port 80.
T+0.4s: thttpd finishes and dies, closing connection with stunnel.
T+0.5s: stunnel finishes sending thttpd's output to its client, and then
stops, believing that it has finished that connection. If forked,
this copy of stunnel dies. The client (internet explorer, firefox,
mozilla... doesn't matter) still believes that the connection is
active, and waits for additional data.
T+10.5s: Roughly 10 seconds later the client decides that the server timed
out
and displays what has been sent so far, which is the entire page.
The only visible symptom is that small webpages seem to take 10
seconds
to load.
The visible symptom, then, is that webpages below a certain size (where that
size is determined by the browser's willingness to refresh its view as data
is being sent) take about 10 seconds to load.
Is it possible that this behavior is due to stunnel?
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com