stunnel-users

1 participants
3311 discussions

Make Install Error
by Morris Hooten - SLS Business Infrastructure 05 Aug '07

05 Aug '07

why do i get this when running make install at the very end? thanks SunOS mknod: Not owner chmod: WARNING: can't access /usr/local/var/lib/stunnel/dev/zero make[2]: *** [install-data-local] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/stunnel/stunnel-4.20/tools' make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/stunnel/stunnel-4.20/tools' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1

1 0

Make Install Error
by Morris Hooten - SLS Business Infrastructure 05 Aug '07

05 Aug '07

1 0

Stunnel message about SSL_shutdown/SSL_get_error
by Lachance, Mario 03 Aug '07

03 Aug '07

Hi, I have been using openssl_0.9.7g and stunnel_4.10 on Solaris 9 without problem for 2 years in a production environment. I want to upgrade to openssl_0.9.8e and stunnel_4.20 on solaris 10. I have done some test on a development system and I have seen a new message in stunnel log file. Old message with openssl_0.9.7g and stunnel_4.10 on Solaris 9 was : Aug 3 14:51:58 solario stunnel[345]: [ID 702911 local6.notice] Too many retries on SSL shutdown New message with openssl_0.9.8e and stunnel_4.20 on solaris 10 is : Aug 3 14:42:30 daprxuu stunnel: [ID 821868 local6.error] LOG3[20957:4]: SSL_shutdown/SSL_get_error returned 6 I don't know if this new message has replaced the old one I was getting. Can someone tell me what is behind this message "_shutdown/SSL_get_error returned 6"? Please note that I am able to transfer message with both system (stunnel 4.10 and stunnel 4.20) from a windows client without any apparent problem. Thank you for your help, Mario Avis de confidentialité: Ce message est confidentiel, protégé par le secret professionnel et à l'usage exclusif du destinataire. Toute autre personne est avisée qu'il lui est strictement interdit de le diffuser, distribuer ou reproduire. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, avisez-nous immédiatement par téléphone et effacez toute copie. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is confidential, privileged and intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. Any other person is strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing or reproducing it. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone and delete all copies.

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel hanging during negotation with an smtp server
by Hans Werner Strube 01 Aug '07

01 Aug '07

Jason J. Corso wrote: > [ssmtp] > accept = 127.0.0.1:25 > connect = xxxxxx:465 > protocol = smtp > ------- > > However, when I try to send a mail, it appears to hang while > negotiating with the remote server. Here is the output: ... > 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: Negotiations for smtp(server > side) started > 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: RFC 2487 detected Your stunnel seems to be running in server mode. For client mode, add client = yes Also, if you need pure SSL rather than TLS negotiation, remove protocol = smtp

2 1

stunnel hanging during negotation with an smtp server
by Jason J. Corso 31 Jul '07

31 Jul '07

Please help: I'm trying to use stunnel to connect to a secure SMTP server -- I'm using MS Entourage 2004 on an Intel 10.4 Mac. Entourage cannot connect directly to the SMTP server over SSL because it no longer supports NTLM version 1 authentication, which the SMTP server uses. I believe stunnel can be used to workaround this problem (if I'm wrong, please say so), i.e., Entourage can connect locally to stunnel which will then connect to the remote server over SSL properly. I built and installed stunnel version 4.04-12 via Fink (compiled from source via Fink) and OpenSSL 0.9.7i-4 also via Fink. I have the following configuration file: ------ # Comment it out on Win32 cert = /sw/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem chroot = /sw/var/run/stunnel/ # PID is created inside chroot jail pid = /stunnel.pid setuid = nobody setgid = nogroup # Some debugging stuff debug = 7 output = /dev/stdout foreground = yes [ssmtp] accept = 127.0.0.1:25 connect = xxxxxx:465 protocol = smtp ------- However, when I try to send a mail, it appears to hang while negotiating with the remote server. Here is the output: 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG5[5511:2684407808]: stunnel 4.04 on i386-apple-darwin8.10.1 PTHREAD+LIBWRAP with OpenSSL 0.9.7i 14 Oct 2005 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: Snagged 64 random bytes from xxx/.rnd 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to xxx/.rnd 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG6[5511:2684407808]: PRNG seeded successfully 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: Certificate: /sw/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: Key file: /sw/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG5[5511:2684407808]: FD_SETSIZE=1024, file ulimit=256 -> 125 clients allowed 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: FD 6 in non-blocking mode 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: ssmtp bound to 127.0.0.1:25 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: FD 7 in non-blocking mode 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: FD 8 in non-blocking mode 2007.07.31 15:41:19 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: Created pid file /stunnel.pid 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: ssmtp accepted FD=9 from 127.0.0.1:50091 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:2684407808]: FD 9 in non-blocking mode 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: ssmtp started 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG5[5511:25183744]: ssmtp connected from 127.0.0.1:50091 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: FD 10 in non-blocking mode 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: ssmtp connecting xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:465 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: remote connect #1: EINPROGRESS: retrying 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: waitforsocket: FD=10, DIR=write 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: waitforsocket: ok 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: Remote FD=10 initialized 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: Negotiations for smtp(server side) started 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: RFC 2487 detected 2007.07.31 15:41:25 LOG7[5511:25183744]: waitforsocket: FD=10, DIR=read ********* HANGS HERE *********** ...and I have to kill it. I am very new to stunnel and openssl. So, I may be making a simple mistake. But, I could not find the solution on the mailing list or the web. What am I doing wrong? To be clear, the server is using SSL for SMTP. I am able to send mail directly via the smtp server from other mail clients like Thunderbird. Thanks. Any help is much appreciated. Jason

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel Scalability Question
by Ankur Upadhyaya 30 Jul '07

30 Jul '07

Hi Michal, Thank you for your help with this. My stunnel -version output can be found below. Ankur stunnel 4.20 on i686-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8b 04 May 2006 Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv4 Global options debug = 5 pid = /usr/local/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem ciphers = ALL:!ADH:+RC4:@STRENGTH key = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem session = 300 seconds sslVersion = SSLv3 for client, all for server TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none

2 1

Stunnel on Freebsd not running
by The Volo 30 Jul '07

30 Jul '07

i recently installed the latest stable version 4.20 on a shell running freebsd, i dont have root i had to install it on my account. Compile was successfull, i renamed the default stunnel.conf.. and edited it, i am running stunnel as a client and added this line at the end of stunnel.conf: [eggdrop] accept = 127.0.0.1:12345 connect = irc.efnet.net:6667 when i run stunnel it doesnt do nothing besides sending me to a new bash command line.. [volo@partyline (~/)]$ /home/volo/stunnel/sbin/stunnel /home/volo/stunnel/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf [volo@partyline (~/)]$ I type ps -x to see if stunnel is running but i dont see it on the list and no pid file exist either. Any ideas on how i can fix this ? i dont see what i am doing wrong trying to run stunnel.. Trying to run stunnel to connect to irc and my eggdrop to connect to stunnel access ip:port thanks

2 1

Automatically Stopping Stunnel
by Brian Mander 19 Jul '07

19 Jul '07

We have stunnel configured to accept connections on a port from an outside company and forward it to a port where we have a tcplistener set up. The problem is that if our tcplistener goes down the company sending us info does not have their software configured to know if we get their info or not. Is there a way to stop allowing connections or shut stunnel down if it can not connect to the port. I hope this is enough information. Brian Mander Programmer Analyst II Omni Hotels (402) 952-6564 bmander(a)omnihotels.com <mailto:[email protected]> Learn more about Omni Hotels sensational summer vacation packages <http://www.omnihotels.com/exclusiveoffers/summer07.aspx> ideal for exploring great destinations with family and friends.

1 0

Stunnel Scalability Question
by Ankur Upadhyaya 18 Jul '07

18 Jul '07

Hi, I have an application with the following characteristics and am trying to determine if Stunnel would be a suitable option for securing my transmissions (in particular, will it scale): - Each of my clients is connected to the Internet via a 56Kbps modem. My server has whatever bandwidth it needs. - Each client "transaction" consists of (a) connecting to a central server using a TCP/IP-based protocol, (b) uploading a 512KB block of data and (c) disconnecting. - Our server needs to be able to handle 2000 concurrent clients under peak loads. - Under the peak load above, I would like to limit the time a client takes to perform a "transaction" to around five minutes or so (uploading 512KB at (56Kbps / 2) = 28Kbps should take ~2.5 minutes). My questions are: (1) Do I have any reason to believe that Stunnel will simply not be able to scale to handle the load described above (i.e. a steady load of 2000 concurrent clients connecting, uploading half a megabyte of data and disconnecting)? (2) If Stunnel can handle this - do you have any thoughts on what sort of machine (or machines) I should be running my server-side Stunnel daemon(s) on? I am particularly concerned about CPU usage. I apologize in advance for any overlap between this query and past threads in the archive/information on the website - I wanted to make sure that I ran the specific requirements above past somebody with experience using Stunnel. Thanks, Ankur

1 0

bind error
by ictforever 07 Jul '07

07 Jul '07

Hi,I use stunnel 4.20 with syslog-ng 2.0,os is centos 5.0.but there are bind errors: ........................... 2007.06.22 05:56:36 LOG7[2898:3086632640]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2007.06.22 05:56:36 LOG3[2898:3086632640]: Error binding 5141 to 192.168.0.1:5141 2007.06.22 05:56:36 LOG3[2898:3086632640]: bind: Cannot assign requested address (99) The stunnel conf : ............................ cert = /usr/local/stunnel/etc/stunnel/syslog-ng-server.pem CAfile = /usr/local/stunnel/etc/stunnel/syslog-ng-client.pem [5141] accept = 192.168.0.1:5141 connect = 127.0.0.1:514 How to correct it?Any suggestion and advice are appreciated. Thanks. Regards.

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users