stunnel-users

3 participants
3308 discussions

Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi Mike, yes your correct, but I have forced the installation with "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_4.x86_64" ( all other packages openssl, etc. updated) and SSLv3 is working again. So, for my understanding there must be a bug or they have disabled SSLv3 in version "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64". Regards, Sebastian. ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 12:12 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, The ChangeLog does not say anything about disabling SSLv3: http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/centos/updates/6.6/x86_64/Packages/stunnel-4.2… I guess it may be disabled in the OpenSSL rather than in stunnel. Anyway, if you connect stunnel with some software that's so old that it doesn't support TLS, the software is almost certainly no longer supported, and most likely vulnerable to attacks. This is a serious risk! Mike On 29.01.2015 11:58, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi Mike, thanks for your fast response, but I think there is a big issue. The latest version that is available in the CENTOS 6 Base Repo is "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64" - In this version the SSLv3 is disabled by default, but there is not option to enable it. I hope you understand my situation :-) ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org><mailto:[email protected]> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net><mailto:[email protected]> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 11:44 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, My documentation describes the latest version of stunnel. For an old version please refer to the appropriate manual page distributed with the specific version you're using. Mike On 29.01.2015 11:40, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

1 0

Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian.

1 0

Blue Iris
by Patrick wickline 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

I have stunnel set up on my machine. It works locally and lets me connect to my Blue Iris server with https. However, I am unable to do this remotely. I have forwarded the port in my router to stunnel, from stunnel to blue iris, but still doesn't work. Below is part of my conf file [Blue Iris] accept = 8344 (forwarded this in the router to my static IP of my machine) connect = 127.0.0.1:8081 (8081 is my blue iris web server) I hope someone is able to give some advice

2 1

stunnel 5.10 released
by Michal Trojnara 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Users, I have released version 5.10 of stunnel. The ChangeLog entry: Version 5.10, 2015.01.22, urgency: LOW: * New features - OCSP AIA (Authority Information Access) support. This feature can be enabled with the new service-level option "OCSPaia". - Additional security features of the linker are enabled: "-z relro", "-z now", "-z noexecstack". * Bugfixes - OpenSSL DLLs updated to version 1.0.1l. https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150108.txt - FIPS canister updated to version 2.0.9 in the Win32 binary build. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: 032bfc1854f8a0b9e452343c36ec6b52c7e0daef0863423c6b13a61a7c92eb23 stunnel-5.10.tar.gz 7c29753b6488f37b29f365e9c4a6060c3da8a89000af1cd29eab7c37d419d148 stunnel-5.10-installer.exe 93cd0941580eaa7815ed62ec88a111cb449e9bad97cd1a35d7524867a8238234 stunnel-5.10-android.zip Best regards, Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTBMTsACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtE+uQCg9N0butSpAQ2mM1M5ySe7T18i oe8AoOAHKJ9F7jMlUfHnmuzBtIPbbghN =e9ed -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] No DNS lookup?
by Colin van der Zanden 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

Ludolf, Thanks for your quick response. I have no clue on how to respond on the stunnel users list, so i'll try it this way. The support on the host we are trying to reach states to following: It really sounds like the stunnel is not connecting to "something.host.com" but perhaps to the IP address behind it? The use of the hostname something.host.com is however an requirement. Is there anyway we can force the stunnel to connect to the hostname instead of resolving it as an IP adress? Met vriendelijke groeten, H.N. Post en Zonen Colin van der Zanden c.vanderzanden(a)duurzaam-transport.com c.vanderzanden(a)hnpostenzonen.nl <dm.post(a)hnpostenzonen.nl> ---------------------------------------------- Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Wilt u direct contact met ons opnemen indien deze e-mail bij vergissing bij u terecht is gekomen? Wij verzoeken u in dat geval de e-mail te vernietigen, de inhoud ervan niet te gebruiken en niet onder derden te verspreiden, omdat het bericht vertrouwelijke informatie kan bevatten, beschermd door een beroepsgeheim.

5 5

No DNS lookup?
by Colin vd Zanden 20 Jan '15

20 Jan '15

Hi, We've got a bit of a problem working with Stunnel. We are trying to connect to a domain, but the stunnel is somehow translating it to a IP adres. (We didn't know, we saw it in the log file). This is causing our connection to fail. Is there any way to prevent stunnel from translating the domain into a IP, and just connect to the domain name?

2 1

Stunnel, please add me to your LinkedIn network
by Neacsu Mihai Adrian 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

Hi Stunnel, I'd like to connect with you on LinkedIn. Neacsu Mihai Adrian Software Developer at RND Software Accept: https://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=0Qd3ASe34VcjAPcPsMcjcOdzARfkh… View Neacsu Mihai Adrian's profile: https://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=d3gTdPANcP8Ofkh9sClyrmlJ9C56m… You are receiving Invitation emails. Unsubscribe here: https://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=7wQbmcVemZCcjlFbj1SqPsRdjRAqm… This email was intended for Stunnel Users (stunnel user at n/a). Learn why we included this at the following link: https://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=0Ue3sQfmh9pmNzqnhOoioUcBZOpm9… © 2014, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

2 1

HTTPS support for the webserver using STUNNEL
by Siva Kumar 13 Jan '15

13 Jan '15

Hi All, I am fairly new to stunnel and also to the networking concepts. Currently we are working on a surveillance device running on monta vista linux on the ARM11 architecture. We have crossed compiled and deployed a THTTPD server which is working fine. Once you connect to the device using any of the web client (from a windows PC), it will take you to a web page where you can select and stream live video's from all the camera's connected to the device. So far everything is working fine now.. Now the real problem is that we need to support https as well along with http. Since THTTPD web server doesn't support secure connection we thought we would accomplish that using the stunnel application. We were able to download and cross compile the stunnel application for the device. Now the doubts I have here is:- 1) Do we need a stunnel server application running on the windows PC from where we will be using the web browser to connect to the client? 2) Where should be the stunnel server and stunnel client be running. I mean should the linux device be running the stunnel client and the windows PC be running the stunnel server? In that case what should be the correct accept and connect parameters in the stunnel.conf file in both the device and the windows PC? 3) Since the device and the machine can have any random IP and port, so is it feasible to dynamically set the accept and connect parameters in the stunnel.conf file? 4) Can the stunnel be considered as a solution to the problem which I have reported here. The point 3 above makes me thing otherwise. I have tried all combinations mentioned in the point 1 and 2 without success. In none of the case my web browser was able to talk to the device using HTTPS (ie https://my_device_ip). I could see a "client hello" request from the browser to which the client sends an ACK and RST. In some combination an HTTPS request from the browser only triggered a TCP connection request for which the client responded with ACK and RST. Sorry for the long mail. Any inputs would be deeply appreciated. Regards, Siva

2 2

Using stunnel to secure clients instead of servers
by Leon Smith 07 Jan '15

07 Jan '15

Hi, this may be a slightly unusual request, but I was curious if stunnel could be used for securing clients that do not support TLS, to connect to services that optionally support TLS. So, really, stunnel already does almost everything that would be needed; except that in this use case, it would be listening for incoming unencrypted connections, and then serve as a proxy to an encrypted connection to the actual service. While it might be nice to offer certificate-based authentication options in this scenario, it wouldn't be necessary for my intended use case, so stunnel wouldn't need access to any private certificates. However, certificate pinning would be pretty essential to what I have in mind. Best, Leon.

2 5

stunnel 5.09 released
by Michal Trojnara 02 Jan '15

02 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Users, I have released version 5.09 of stunnel. The ChangeLog entry: Version 5.09, 2015.01.02, urgency: LOW: * New features - Added PSK authentication with two new service-level configuration file options "PSKsecrets" and "PSKidentity". - Added additional security checks to the OpenSSL memory management functions. - Added support for the OPENSSL_NO_OCSP and OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE OpenSSL configuration flags. - Added compatibility with the current OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev tree. * Bugfixes - Removed defective s_poll_error() code occasionally causing connections to be prematurely closed (truncated). This bug was introduced in stunnel 4.34. - Fixed ./configure systemd detection (thx to Kip Walraven). - Fixed ./configure sysroot detection (thx to Kip Walraven). - Fixed compilation against old versions of OpenSSL. - Removed outdated French manual page. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: 87b34a74061861d1edd2ab238c73eb989b3d0a17e44574b7b6ead1a16aae38c8 stunnel-5.09.tar.gz 4abbddf3c1dbedf54b14fa5a18ead11e4df6387f13189b665c2ec5759c4afd30 stunnel-5.09-installer.exe 23c33dc46cc1bfb1df77c88d3c48901822bc113dd1e67d138bcf5fb1bb3d4197 stunnel-5.09-android.zip Best regards, Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlSmt98ACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtGZowCfTspj4OZn8DRBUboG2S+1Qy2A ocoAoLdZpjJU7BjERXqQakhNIPOXFojN =/MD9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users