- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

Gmail POP3 retrieval, SSL-Error and Cert Chain
by Tobias Ruch 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi, I want to use stunnel to enable ssl on port 995. Unfortunately, I got "SSL error: Unable to verify the first certificate." when using the gmail pop3 retrieval My Certificate is signed by wosign and included in the mozialla truststore list. https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html gives me a grad A for my apache configuration and chrome and firefox are also fine with this certificate. So it's no self signed one. For a test I have configured stunnel to serve https. I get than the message that the chain is incomplete. According to https://www.digicert.com/ssl-support/gmail-pop3-troubleshooting.htm this could be one reason for this error. My Apache-config looks like this SSLCertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/mydomain.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/apache2/ssl//mydomain.key SSLCertificateChainFile /etc/apache2/ssl/1_root_bundle.crt SSLCACertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/ca-certs.pem for stunnel I used cert = /etc/apache2/ssl/mydomain.crt key = /etc/apache2/ssl//mydomain.key CAfile = /etc/apache2/ssl/1_root_bundle.crt or ca-certs.pem (I have tried both). What is the a similar configuration in stunnel? The Post https://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/2010-February/002594.html mentioned, that the chain must be completely in the crt-file. But a description how to achieve this is missing and I found no other resources describing this. Thanks a lot Tobias

1 0

Stunnel for EWS servers?
by shanmuganathan sedukumar 20 Feb '15

20 Feb '15

HI, We are already using stunnel as SSL wrapper for retrieving emails from POP3 servers to our application server. In future the mailboxes are planned to be migrated to EWS servers. Would like to know if stunnel holds good for EWS servers as well. Regards,Shanmuganathan

2 1

TLSv1 - Linux vs Windows ?
by Brian Ipsen 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Hi I have a strange issue with stunnel 5.09 - which connects up to a F5 loadbalancer/SSL-offloading engine. In my config, I specify that the protocol must be TLSv1 - from Linux, I can connect - but it does not work from Windows.. Linux log: 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22779]: Service [rb20] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:33247 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: Service [rb20] started 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG5[22887]: Service [rb20] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:33247 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22887]: s_connect: connecting A.B.C.D:443 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: s_connect: s_poll_wait A.B.C.D:443: waiting 10 seconds 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG5[22887]: s_connect: connected A.B.C.D:443 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG5[22887]: Service [rb20] connected remote server from 10.11.12.101:33477 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: Remote socket (FD=11) initialized 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22887]: SNI: sending servername: host.domain.com 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 1 items in the session cache 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 5 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 5 client connects that finished 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 0 server connects that finished 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 4 session cache hits 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 0 external session cache hits 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 0 session cache misses 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: 0 session cache timeouts 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22887]: SSL connected: previous session reused 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22779]: Service [rb20] accepted (FD=12) from 127.0.0.1:33249 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22887]: Read socket closed (read hangup) 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: Sending close_notify alert 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: SSL alert (write): warning: close notify 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22887]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: Service [rb20] started 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG5[22888]: Service [rb20] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:33249 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22888]: s_connect: connecting A.B.C.D:443 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: s_connect: s_poll_wait A.B.C.D:443: waiting 10 seconds 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG5[22888]: s_connect: connected A.B.C.D:443 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG5[22888]: Service [rb20] connected remote server from 10.11.12.101:33479 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: Remote socket (FD=13) initialized 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22888]: SNI: sending servername: ssl39.dmsave.com 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22887]: SSL socket closed (SSL_read) 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: Sent socket write shutdown 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG5[22887]: Connection closed: 136 byte(s) sent to SSL, 52 byte(s) sent to socket 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: Remote socket (FD=11) closed 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: Local socket (FD=3) closed 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22887]: Service [rb20] finished (1 left) 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 1 items in the session cache 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 6 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 6 client connects that finished 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 0 server connects that finished 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 5 session cache hits 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 0 external session cache hits 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 0 session cache misses 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG7[22888]: 0 session cache timeouts 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22888]: SSL connected: previous session reused Windows log: 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[9528]: Service [rb20] accepted (FD=1128) from 127.0.0.1:50353 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[9528]: Creating a new thread 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[9528]: New thread created 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Service [rb20] started 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG5[7056]: Service [rb20] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:50353 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[7056]: s_connect: connecting A.B.C.D:443 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: s_connect: s_poll_wait A.B.C.D:443: waiting 10 seconds 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG5[7056]: s_connect: connected A.B.C.D:443 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG5[7056]: Service [rb20] connected remote server from 192.168.225.103:50354 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Remote socket (FD=1124) initialized 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[7056]: SNI: sending servername: host.domain.com 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server certificate A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server done A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client key exchange A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 1 items in the session cache 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 1 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 1 client connects that finished 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 0 server connects that finished 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 0 session cache hits 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 0 external session cache hits 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 0 session cache misses 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: 0 session cache timeouts 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Peer certificate was cached (1521 bytes) 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[7056]: SSL connected: new session negotiated 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[7056]: Negotiated TLSv1 ciphersuite RC4-MD5 (128-bit encryption) 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[7056]: Read socket closed (readsocket) 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Sending close_notify alert 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: SSL alert (write): warning: close notify 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[7056]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[9528]: Service [rb20] accepted (FD=1132) from 127.0.0.1:50355 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[9528]: Creating a new thread 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[9528]: New thread created 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[2164]: Service [rb20] started 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG5[2164]: Service [rb20] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:50355 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[2164]: s_connect: connecting A.B.C.D:443 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[2164]: s_connect: s_poll_wait A.B.C.D:443: waiting 10 seconds 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG5[2164]: s_connect: connected A.B.C.D:443 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG5[2164]: Service [rb20] connected remote server from 192.168.225.103:50356 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[2164]: Remote socket (FD=1152) initialized 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[2164]: SNI: sending servername: host.domain.com 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[2164]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[2164]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[7056]: SSL socket closed (SSL_read) 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Sent socket write shutdown 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG5[7056]: Connection closed: 89 byte(s) sent to SSL, 52 byte(s) sent to socket 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Remote socket (FD=1124) closed 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Local socket (FD=1128) closed 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Service [rb20] finished (1 left) The main difference I can see, is that on Linux I get: 2015.02.10 15:58:29 LOG6[22887]: SSL connected: previous session reused Whereas Windows gives me: 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG7[7056]: Peer certificate was cached (1521 bytes) 2015.02.10 16:07:36 LOG6[7056]: SSL connected: new session negotiated Any idea why this happens ? The final result is that connections are possible from linux - but not Windows - and this is a problem for me... Regards /Brian

2 2

stunnel transparent mode stuck in timeout
by shushant.kakkar＠lhsystems.com 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hi, we would like to use stunnel in transpartent mode. Therefore we already applied iptable changes as mentioned in the man page : Re-write address to appear as if wrapped daemon is connecting from the SSL client machine instead of the machine running stunnel. This option is currently available in: remote mode (I<connect> option) on Linux >=2.6.28 Linux >=2.6.28 requires the following setup for iptables and routing (possibly in /etc/rc.local or equivalent file): iptables -t mangle -N DIVERT iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m socket -j DIVERT iptables -t mangle -A DIVERT -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A DIVERT -j ACCEPT ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100 ip route add local 0.0.0.0/0 dev lo table 100 However the connection to the services cannot be established and we run into a timeout. 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568909760]: ldaps-in accepted FD=12 from xxxxxx:51018 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: ldaps-in started 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: FD 12 in non-blocking mode 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: Acquired libwrap process #0 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: Releasing libwrap process #0 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: Released libwrap process #0 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: ldaps-in permitted by libwrap from xxxxxxx:51018 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG5[6658:139940568905472]: ldaps-in accepted connection from xxxxxxx:51018 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate A 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server done A 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client key exchange A 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read finished A 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write finished A 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 1 items in the session cache 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 0 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 0 client connects that finished 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 1 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 1 server connects that finished 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 0 session cache hits 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 0 external session cache hits 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 0 session cache misses 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: 0 session cache timeouts 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG6[6658:139940568905472]: SSL accepted: new session negotiated 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG6[6658:139940568905472]: Negotiated ciphers: AES256-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AES(256) Mac=SHA1 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: FD 13 in non-blocking mode 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG6[6658:139940568905472]: local_bind succeeded on the original port 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG6[6658:139940568905472]: connect_blocking: connecting 127.0.0.1:10389 2015.02.09 10:00:03 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:10389: waiting 10 seconds 2015.02.09 10:00:13 LOG3[6658:139940568905472]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:10389: timeout 2015.02.09 10:00:13 LOG5[6658:139940568905472]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2015.02.09 10:00:13 LOG7[6658:139940568905472]: ldaps-in finished (0 left) Any idea why the timeout is occuring? Best regards, Shushant

1 0

New PGP key
by Michal Trojnara 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

Dear Users, As of now I'm starting to sign my emails and code with a new PGP key. The new key is attached to this email message, and available at https://www.stunnel.org/pgp.asc Key fingerprint = AC91 5EA3 0645 D9D3 D4DA E4FE B104 8932 DD3A AAA3 The new key is also signed with my previous PGP key. This and other signatures can be verified with: gpg --check-sigs "AC91 5EA3 0645 D9D3 D4DA E4FE B104 8932 DD3A AAA3" Best regards, Mike

1 0

stunnel keeps using SSLv3 even after disabling it
by Or Yarimi 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

Hi, I'm using stunnel to communicate with FIX server. In order to do that, I disabled SSLv2 and SSLv3 and set the sslVersion to TLSv1. It seems like stunnel keeps trying using SSLv3 handshake, which isn't working. This is the configuration: client = yes debug = 7 output=stunnel.log cert = stunnel.pem ; Some performance tunings socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 ; Turning for LMAX options = NO_SSLv2 options = NO_SSLv3 [LMAX-fix-tunnel-DEMO-Trading] sslVersion = TLSv1 accept = 40001 connect = fix-ate.lmaxtrader.com:443 stunnel log: 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: Service [LMAX-fix-tunnel-DEMO-MktData] started 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG5[12516]: Service [LMAX-fix-tunnel-DEMO-MktData] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:59475 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG6[12516]: s_connect: connecting 91.215.165.69:443 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 91.215.165.69:443: waiting 10 seconds 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG5[12516]: s_connect: connected 91.215.165.69:443 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG5[12516]: Service [LMAX-fix-tunnel-DEMO-MktData] connected remote server from 10.0.0.62:59476 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: Remote socket (FD=620) initialized 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG6[12516]: SNI: sending servername: fix-md-ate.lmaxtrader.com 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2015.02.04 12:10:31 LOG7[12516]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A Already burned around 4 hours understanding what I'm doing wrong, will be glad if you could help me. Thanks in advance, Or. -- *Attention:* This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and delete the original message from your system without making a copy. This e-mail is attributed to the sender and does not necessarily reflect the view of Markets Pulse P.S. Ltd. or any affiliate. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

1 0

Can't compile stunnel 5.10 on Linux ... got fatal signal 11 error
by amontaron 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

Hi everybody ! I tried to compile stunnel 5.10 (latest) on my old Suse 7 Linux distrib and got "a fatal signal 11 error message" when doing the make command. Just before, openssl 1.0.2 (latest) compile fine with no errors. Also, I add some stuffs like xemacs 21.4.22 (latest) just to say that that rather old distrib is able to do all that :-D So, here is the latest messages from make I got : > Making all in src > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make all-am > make[2]: Entering directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > source='stunnel.c' object='stunnel-stunnel.o' libtool=no \ > DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../auto/depcomp \ > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/usr/kerberos/include > -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DLIBDIR='"/usr/local/lib/stunnel"' > -DCONFDIR='"/usr/local/etc/stunnel"' -g -O2 -pthread -Wall > -Wformat=2 -Wconversion -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated-declarations > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c -o stunnel-stunnel.o `test -f 'stunnel.c' || > echo './'`stunnel.c > In file included from /usr/include/string.h:346, > from common.h:201, > from stunnel.c:38: > /usr/include/bits/string2.h: In function `__strsep_g': > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 2 of > `__strpbrk_c2' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 3 of > `__strpbrk_c2' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 2 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 3 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 4 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 > make[2]: *** [stunnel-stunnel.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Previously got lots of warning messages. Perhaps need "make report" also ? I've look at stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org mail archive up to July 2011 with no success. So, that's why I'm writting to you there... Then, I tried different versions of stunnel 4.xx like 4.00, 4.56, 4.28 and more. All simply don't compile with differents errors messages. The only one I could compile completly is stunnel 3.22 (so latest 3.xx) Note that I'm happy with that because I was running stunnel 3.3 just before and that everything works with the latest openssl version I download and everything works fine for what I would ! Remark: Suse7 distrib (not OpenSuse) is Linux 2.2.16 kernel (not latest :-D) Alex. PS: Another things, on the same machine I ran stunnel 4.56 on (old) Windows 98 with no problems. --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com

2 2

stunnel log shows SSLv3 protocol level even when TLSv1 was negotiated
by christian.tenvenne＠lhsystems.com 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

I'm running stunnel in server-mode with options "NO_SSLV2" and "NO_SSLV3" and sslVersion=all. My client also explicitly disables SSLv2 and SSLv3. My client's ssl-log (-Djavax.net.debug=ssl) confirms that, during handshake and for application data, the highest TLS protocol version is being used. How come, stunnel log still shows "SSLv3" ? 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG5[8415:140561397376768]: ldaps-in accepted connection from X.X.X.X:65158 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server done A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client key exchange A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read finished A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write finished A 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 9 items in the session cache 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 client connects that finished 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 12 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 9 server connects that finished 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 session cache hits 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 external session cache hits 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 session cache misses 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG7[8415:140561397376768]: 0 session cache timeouts 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG6[8415:140561397376768]: SSL accepted: new session negotiated 2015.02.03 14:42:46 LOG6[8415:140561397376768]: Negotiated ciphers: AES128-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AES(128) Mac=SHA1 Is my client's ssl-log wrong? Or stunnel's? Kind regards, Christian Tenvenne

2 1

issue with stunnel forwarding
by David 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

I am trying to configure stunnel on a bridge server which needs to use ssl to talk to 3 others servers. below is my conf file: ; ***************************************** Example SSL server mode services [ xyz ] accept=10.10.10.74:9908 connect= 127.0.0.10:1040 transparent = source[ hp ] accept=10.10.10.218:9904 connect=127.0.0.10:1041 transparent = source[ sql] accept=10.10.10.214:59053 connect=127.0.0.10:1042 transparent = source when I run the stunnel GUI start I get following message: [ ] No limit detected for the number of clients [.] stunnel 5.10 on x86-pc-msvc-1500 platform [.] Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.1l 15 Jan 2015 [.] Threading:WIN32 Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI [ ] errno: (*_errno()) [.] Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf [ ] GUI message loop initialized [.] UTF-8 byte order mark detected [ ] Enabling support for engine "capi" [ ] Initializing engine #1 (capi) [ ] Engine #1 (capi) initialized [.] FIPS mode disabled [ ] Compression disabled [ ] Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd [ ] Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd [ ] PRNG seeded successfully [!] Line 62: "transparent = source": Specified option name is not valid here[!] Server is down what am I missing here? thanks! nazja2015

2 1

stunnel-5.10, FreeBsd Package building, missing openssl and perl packages and config menue for Stunnel is missing ssl port
by mugetsu shinde 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

so ive noticed in the previous stunnel 5.07 i was able to select SSL_PORT when making the config for Stunnel , well now after downloading stunnel 5.10 with FreeBsd 10.1 over portsnap fetch extract , Stunnel is missing the option: SSL_PORT why , whats going on ? btw ive noticed openssl and perl arent downloaded from the portsnap server either apparently , help please , i need this for my pfsense 2.2 release vm to work with Stunnel again

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi Mike, thanks for your fast response, but I think there is a big issue. The latest version that is available in the CENTOS 6 Base Repo is "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64" - In this version the SSLv3 is disabled by default, but there is not option to enable it. I hope you understand my situation :-) ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 11:44 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, My documentation describes the latest version of stunnel. For an old version please refer to the appropriate manual page distributed with the specific version you're using. Mike On 29.01.2015 11:40, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi Mike, yes your correct, but I have forced the installation with "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_4.x86_64" ( all other packages openssl, etc. updated) and SSLv3 is working again. So, for my understanding there must be a bug or they have disabled SSLv3 in version "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64". Regards, Sebastian. ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 12:12 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, The ChangeLog does not say anything about disabling SSLv3: http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/centos/updates/6.6/x86_64/Packages/stunnel-4.2… I guess it may be disabled in the OpenSSL rather than in stunnel. Anyway, if you connect stunnel with some software that's so old that it doesn't support TLS, the software is almost certainly no longer supported, and most likely vulnerable to attacks. This is a serious risk! Mike On 29.01.2015 11:58, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi Mike, thanks for your fast response, but I think there is a big issue. The latest version that is available in the CENTOS 6 Base Repo is "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64" - In this version the SSLv3 is disabled by default, but there is not option to enable it. I hope you understand my situation :-) ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org><mailto:[email protected]> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net><mailto:[email protected]> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 11:44 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, My documentation describes the latest version of stunnel. For an old version please refer to the appropriate manual page distributed with the specific version you're using. Mike On 29.01.2015 11:40, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

1 0

Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian.

1 0

Blue Iris
by Patrick wickline 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

I have stunnel set up on my machine. It works locally and lets me connect to my Blue Iris server with https. However, I am unable to do this remotely. I have forwarded the port in my router to stunnel, from stunnel to blue iris, but still doesn't work. Below is part of my conf file [Blue Iris] accept = 8344 (forwarded this in the router to my static IP of my machine) connect = 127.0.0.1:8081 (8081 is my blue iris web server) I hope someone is able to give some advice

2 1

stunnel 5.10 released
by Michal Trojnara 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Users, I have released version 5.10 of stunnel. The ChangeLog entry: Version 5.10, 2015.01.22, urgency: LOW: * New features - OCSP AIA (Authority Information Access) support. This feature can be enabled with the new service-level option "OCSPaia". - Additional security features of the linker are enabled: "-z relro", "-z now", "-z noexecstack". * Bugfixes - OpenSSL DLLs updated to version 1.0.1l. https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150108.txt - FIPS canister updated to version 2.0.9 in the Win32 binary build. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: 032bfc1854f8a0b9e452343c36ec6b52c7e0daef0863423c6b13a61a7c92eb23 stunnel-5.10.tar.gz 7c29753b6488f37b29f365e9c4a6060c3da8a89000af1cd29eab7c37d419d148 stunnel-5.10-installer.exe 93cd0941580eaa7815ed62ec88a111cb449e9bad97cd1a35d7524867a8238234 stunnel-5.10-android.zip Best regards, Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTBMTsACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtE+uQCg9N0butSpAQ2mM1M5ySe7T18i oe8AoOAHKJ9F7jMlUfHnmuzBtIPbbghN =e9ed -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] No DNS lookup?
by Colin van der Zanden 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

Ludolf, Thanks for your quick response. I have no clue on how to respond on the stunnel users list, so i'll try it this way. The support on the host we are trying to reach states to following: It really sounds like the stunnel is not connecting to "something.host.com" but perhaps to the IP address behind it? The use of the hostname something.host.com is however an requirement. Is there anyway we can force the stunnel to connect to the hostname instead of resolving it as an IP adress? Met vriendelijke groeten, H.N. Post en Zonen Colin van der Zanden c.vanderzanden(a)duurzaam-transport.com c.vanderzanden(a)hnpostenzonen.nl <dm.post(a)hnpostenzonen.nl> ---------------------------------------------- Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Wilt u direct contact met ons opnemen indien deze e-mail bij vergissing bij u terecht is gekomen? Wij verzoeken u in dat geval de e-mail te vernietigen, de inhoud ervan niet te gebruiken en niet onder derden te verspreiden, omdat het bericht vertrouwelijke informatie kan bevatten, beschermd door een beroepsgeheim.

5 5

No DNS lookup?
by Colin vd Zanden 20 Jan '15

20 Jan '15

Hi, We've got a bit of a problem working with Stunnel. We are trying to connect to a domain, but the stunnel is somehow translating it to a IP adres. (We didn't know, we saw it in the log file). This is causing our connection to fail. Is there any way to prevent stunnel from translating the domain into a IP, and just connect to the domain name?

2 1

Stunnel, please add me to your LinkedIn network
by Neacsu Mihai Adrian 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

Hi Stunnel, I'd like to connect with you on LinkedIn. Neacsu Mihai Adrian Software Developer at RND Software Accept: https://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=0Qd3ASe34VcjAPcPsMcjcOdzARfkh… View Neacsu Mihai Adrian's profile: https://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=d3gTdPANcP8Ofkh9sClyrmlJ9C56m… You are receiving Invitation emails. Unsubscribe here: https://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=7wQbmcVemZCcjlFbj1SqPsRdjRAqm… This email was intended for Stunnel Users (stunnel user at n/a). Learn why we included this at the following link: https://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect=0Ue3sQfmh9pmNzqnhOoioUcBZOpm9… © 2014, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

2 1

HTTPS support for the webserver using STUNNEL
by Siva Kumar 13 Jan '15

13 Jan '15

Hi All, I am fairly new to stunnel and also to the networking concepts. Currently we are working on a surveillance device running on monta vista linux on the ARM11 architecture. We have crossed compiled and deployed a THTTPD server which is working fine. Once you connect to the device using any of the web client (from a windows PC), it will take you to a web page where you can select and stream live video's from all the camera's connected to the device. So far everything is working fine now.. Now the real problem is that we need to support https as well along with http. Since THTTPD web server doesn't support secure connection we thought we would accomplish that using the stunnel application. We were able to download and cross compile the stunnel application for the device. Now the doubts I have here is:- 1) Do we need a stunnel server application running on the windows PC from where we will be using the web browser to connect to the client? 2) Where should be the stunnel server and stunnel client be running. I mean should the linux device be running the stunnel client and the windows PC be running the stunnel server? In that case what should be the correct accept and connect parameters in the stunnel.conf file in both the device and the windows PC? 3) Since the device and the machine can have any random IP and port, so is it feasible to dynamically set the accept and connect parameters in the stunnel.conf file? 4) Can the stunnel be considered as a solution to the problem which I have reported here. The point 3 above makes me thing otherwise. I have tried all combinations mentioned in the point 1 and 2 without success. In none of the case my web browser was able to talk to the device using HTTPS (ie https://my_device_ip) I could see a "client hello" request from the browser to which the client sends an ACK and RST. In some combination an HTTPS request from the browser only triggered a TCP connection request for which the client responded with ACK and RST. Sorry for the long mail. Any inputs would be deeply appreciated. Regards, Siva

2 2

Using stunnel to secure clients instead of servers
by Leon Smith 07 Jan '15

07 Jan '15

Hi, this may be a slightly unusual request, but I was curious if stunnel could be used for securing clients that do not support TLS, to connect to services that optionally support TLS. So, really, stunnel already does almost everything that would be needed; except that in this use case, it would be listening for incoming unencrypted connections, and then serve as a proxy to an encrypted connection to the actual service. While it might be nice to offer certificate-based authentication options in this scenario, it wouldn't be necessary for my intended use case, so stunnel wouldn't need access to any private certificates. However, certificate pinning would be pretty essential to what I have in mind. Best, Leon.

2 5

stunnel 5.09 released
by Michal Trojnara 02 Jan '15

02 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Users, I have released version 5.09 of stunnel. The ChangeLog entry: Version 5.09, 2015.01.02, urgency: LOW: * New features - Added PSK authentication with two new service-level configuration file options "PSKsecrets" and "PSKidentity". - Added additional security checks to the OpenSSL memory management functions. - Added support for the OPENSSL_NO_OCSP and OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE OpenSSL configuration flags. - Added compatibility with the current OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev tree. * Bugfixes - Removed defective s_poll_error() code occasionally causing connections to be prematurely closed (truncated). This bug was introduced in stunnel 4.34. - Fixed ./configure systemd detection (thx to Kip Walraven). - Fixed ./configure sysroot detection (thx to Kip Walraven). - Fixed compilation against old versions of OpenSSL. - Removed outdated French manual page. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: 87b34a74061861d1edd2ab238c73eb989b3d0a17e44574b7b6ead1a16aae38c8 stunnel-5.09.tar.gz 4abbddf3c1dbedf54b14fa5a18ead11e4df6387f13189b665c2ec5759c4afd30 stunnel-5.09-installer.exe 23c33dc46cc1bfb1df77c88d3c48901822bc113dd1e67d138bcf5fb1bb3d4197 stunnel-5.09-android.zip Best regards, Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlSmt98ACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtGZowCfTspj4OZn8DRBUboG2S+1Qy2A ocoAoLdZpjJU7BjERXqQakhNIPOXFojN =/MD9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

help with xforwarded-for
by Senthil Naidu 30 Dec '14

30 Dec '14

Hi, I am trying to use stunnel 5.08 can we enable xforwarded-for option using some patches , the last patch I see is in haproxy website for version stunnel version 4.32 Regards Senthil

2 1

SSL alert (read): warning: close notify
by Jinming Shao 22 Dec '14

22 Dec '14

I am trying to use stunnel to turn ws into wss. Stunnel is running in client mode. It always got disconnected from remote server. my stunnel configuration: [websocket] client = yes accept = localhost:8676 connect = echo.websocket.org:443 Then I use wsdump.py(https://github.com/liris/websocket-client) to connect it: $ wsdump.py ws://localhost:8676 Handshake status 40 Does anyone know what's wrong? The log file: 2014.12.22 23:13:01 LOG7[4445147136]: Service [websocket] started 2014.12.22 23:13:01 LOG5[4445147136]: Service [websocket] accepted connection from ::1:52132 2014.12.22 23:13:01 LOG6[4445147136]: s_connect: connecting 174.129.224.73:443 2014.12.22 23:13:01 LOG7[4445147136]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 174.129.224.73:443: waiting 10 seconds 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG5[4445147136]: s_connect: connected 174.129.224.73:443 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG5[4445147136]: Service [websocket] connected remote server from 192.168.1.100:52133 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: Remote socket (FD=10) initialized 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG6[4445147136]: SNI: sending servername: echo.websocket.org 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server certificate A 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server done A 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client key exchange A 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 1 items in the session cache 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 1 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 1 client connects that finished 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 0 server connects that finished 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 0 session cache hits 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 0 external session cache hits 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 0 session cache misses 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: 0 session cache timeouts 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG7[4445147136]: Peer certificate was cached (6641 bytes) 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG6[4445147136]: SSL connected: new session negotiated 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG6[4445147136]: Negotiated TLSv1/SSLv3 ciphersuite: RC4-SHA (128-bit encryption) 2014.12.22 23:13:02 LOG6[4445147136]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL alert (read): warning: close notify 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG6[4445147136]: SSL closed (SSL_read) 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: Sent socket write shutdown 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG6[4445147136]: Read socket closed (readsocket) 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: Sending close_notify alert 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: SSL alert (write): warning: close notify 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG6[4445147136]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG5[4445147136]: Connection closed: 184 byte(s) sent to SSL, 132 byte(s) sent to socket 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: Remote socket (FD=10) closed 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: Local socket (FD=3) closed 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: Service [websocket] finished (0 left) 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: str_stats: 3 block(s), 18446744073709549504 data byte(s), 222 control byte(s) 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: str_stats: 128 byte(s) at network.c:413 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: str_stats: 128 byte(s) at network.c:412 2014.12.22 23:13:03 LOG7[4445147136]: str_stats: 128 byte(s) at network.c:41

1 0

RHEL6 Update stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1 breaks functionality?
by H.U.Flück 21 Dec '14

21 Dec '14

Hello I realized that the latest RHEL6 updates including stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1 break our Stunnel connections! We are forced to go back to previous version stunnel-4.29-3.el6_4 in order to have the systems running again, and blocking Stunnel updates in /etc/yum.conf for the moment. Our typical client config and server configs are as follows: Client (5.08): ********** client = yes compression = zlib sslversion = TLSv1 delay = yes debug = 7 taskbar = yes cert = my.pem [abas_ssh] accept = 127.0.30.10:5303 connect = firewall.client.dom:5303 Server, xinetd.d: ************* service stunnel_ssh { disable = no socket_type = stream instances = UNLIMITED per_source = UNLIMITED wait = no user = root server = /usr/bin/stunnel server_args = /etc/stunnel/stunnel_ssh.conf log_on_success += HOST DURATION log_on_failure += HOST } Server, stunnel_ssh.conf **************** cert = /support/stunnel/cert/server.pem CApath = / support /stunnel/hash/ verify = 3 debug = 7 connect = 192.168.1.100:22 The error thrown is something like: Dec 17 17:30:23 srvabas stunnel: LOG3[3385:140171595282368]: SSL_accept: 140760FC: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol What are we missing? Do we need to change the configuration? Any help is highly appreciated. Kind regards H.U.Flueck

4 3

Ordinal not found error on new Stunnel install
by Tracy Drake - IQ-C 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

Hello Michal! We have just pushed/began to push Stunnel version 5.04 to our user community. This version was extensively tested, pushed/installed on a number of machines both with an older version of Stunnel and no Stunnel at all. We are having a barrage of users encountering the below error. [image: Inline image 1] Can you offer insight/a quick resolution? Bear in mind that although I support the apps that require Stunnel I know very little about the ins and outs of Stunnel. I did google this error and found something to the effect that a newer version of the LIBEAY32.dll is required. Does this perhaps mean that this file did not get replaced on these machines. We were previously running quite an older version - 4.27. Please advise asap! -- Tracy Drake CSM Senior Consultant GSA-FAS CAMEO Contractor URSA & INFOConnect Support & Training Team Lead 704-987-1211 tracy.drake(a)gsa.gov

2 1