- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

Testing stunnel 4.19
by Michal Trojnara 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

Dear Users, Please test stunnel 4.19 in you environments and post any problem to the list, so I can fix it in stunnel 4.20 (to be released soon). I expect stunnel 4.20 to be the recommended stable release for quite a long time. 8-) Best regards, Mike

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] No way to keep the key encrypted?
by Michal Trojnara 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

On Wednesday 15 November 2006 16:30, joe(a)strout.net wrote: > That's good news! ...But, how do I use it (in daemon mode)? I tried > launching stunnel with an encrypted key, and it simply failed saying > that the pass phrase was wrong. But it never asked me for a pass > phrase. How do I make it do so? I confirm it's broken in stunnel 4.19. I'll fix it in 4.20. 4.18 works fine. Best regards, Mike

1 1

Re: [stunnel-users] No way to keep the key encrypted?
by Hans Werner Strube 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

Michal Trojnara wrote: > Obviously private key encryption should not be used in inetd mode. It > works fine in daemon mode and on Win32 platform. Yes, but only when stunnel is started manually. When started automatically on system boot, there is usually nobody present to enter the password of the encrypted private key (except when the key is stored somewhere and its input provided by some script or program - again a security hole). This is not a special problem of stunnel but of all SSL-using servers.

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] No way to keep the key encrypted?
by Michal Trojnara 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

Joe Strout wrote: > The private key cannot be encrypted [cut] > This seems very dangerous to me; This paragraph of the manual was obsolete so I've removed it. Obviously private key encryption should not be used in inetd mode. It works fine in daemon mode and on Win32 platform. Best regards, Mike

1 0

"wrong version number" error
by joe＠strout.net 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

With a cleartext key (see previous thread), I'm able to get stunnel to actually run. However, it's failing when I try to connect to my server with https, generating the following output: 2006.11.15 09:10:11 LOG5[18343:25188864]: https accepted connection from 67.174.105.26:39907 2006.11.15 09:10:11 LOG7[18343:25188864]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2006.11.15 09:10:11 LOG3[18343:25188864]: SSL_accept: 1408F10B: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number 2006.11.15 09:10:11 LOG5[18343:25188864]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2006.11.15 09:10:11 LOG7[18343:25188864]: https finished (0 left) The important part here I suppose is "SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number". Can anyone elaborate on what this means, and what I can do about it? Thank you, - Joe -- Joe Strout -- joe(a)strout.net Verified Express, LLC "Making the Internet a Better Place" http://www.verex.com/

1 0

No way to keep the key encrypted?
by joe＠strout.net 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

I see from the manual: "Two things are important when generating certificate-key pairs for stunnel. The private key cannot be encrypted, because the server has no way to obtain the password from the user. To produce an unencrypted key add the -nodes option when running the req command from the OpenSSL kit." This seems very dangerous to me; anybody who gets ahold of that key file will then be able to impersonate my server, right? Symbian SSL Proxy will simply ask me for my pass phrase when I launch it. Is there any way to get stunnel to do something equivalent -- maybe by decrypting it on the fly and piping it to stunnel on launch, so that there is never a decrypted file on disk? Or maybe I can decrypt the key to a file, launch stunnel, and then immediately delete that file? How have others dealt with this? Thanks, - Joe -- Joe Strout -- joe(a)strout.net Verified Express, LLC "Making the Internet a Better Place" http://www.verex.com/

1 0

[RE][stunnel-users] ciphers=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA
by algol sigfrid 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

2 1

Stunnel 4.19 released
by Michal Trojnara 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

Dear Users, A new version of stunnel has just been released. Version 4.19, 2006.11.11, urgency: LOW/EXPERIMENTAL: * Release notes - There are a lot of new features in this version. I recommend to test it well before upgrading your mission-critical systems. * New features - New service-level option to specify OCSP server flag: OCSPflag = <flag> - "protocolCredentials" option changed to "protocolUsername" and "protocolPassword" - NTLM support to be enabled with the new service-level option: protocolAuthentication = NTLM - imap protocol negotiation support added. - Passphrase cache was added so the user does not need to reenter the same passphrase for each defined service any more. - New service-level option to retry connect+exec section: retry = yes|no - Local IP and port is logged for each established connection. - Win32 DLLs for OpenSSL 0.9.8d. * Bugfixes - Serious problem with SSL_WANT_* retries fixed. The new code requires extensive testing! Homepage: http://stunnel.mirt.net/ Download: ftp://stunnel.mirt.net/stunnel/ sha1sum for stunnel-4.19.tar.gz: d58da8117278d71598279c77935585de81b74394 Best regards, Mike

2 1

Error when I try adding compression to stunnel.conf
by Rami Michael 15 Nov '06

15 Nov '06

So it seems i found the answer to my own question... compression was added in stunnel 4.06. I am using 4.05 :)

1 0

Does stunnel supports IPv6
by Ravi Gowda 14 Nov '06

14 Nov '06

Hi All, Can we use ipv6 addresses in stunnel? The problem that I am facing is I want to have secure ldap sessions using two IPv6 systems but none of them speak SSL... How to go about it??? Thanks in Advance Ravi Gowda

2 1