stunnel-users

3306 discussions

Help on configuring Stunnel
by Patel Dippen-CDP054 24 Jul '08

24 Jul '08

I downloaded the pre-compiled Windows version of Stunnel (stunnel-4.25-installer.exe). We need to deploy this on 2 machines A and B. The way it works is: - B connects to A - then A connects to B How should I configure Stunnel on machine A, since, in the first case A is the Server and in the 2nd scenario A becomes the Client. Questions on deploying Stunnel on machine A: - Can I run just 1 instance of Stunnel on machine A? It seems I cannot since I have to set the "client = yes" in the 2nd scenario - Do I need to run multiple instances, 1 running as the Server and the 2nd as the Client? Here is the config file I used on the machine A: **************************** cert = stunnel.pem socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [iPerfS] accept = 5010 connect = 127.0.0.1:5001 [iPerfS] accept = 5002 connect = 12.50.0.25:5020 **************************** Here is the config file I used on the machine B: **************************** cert = stunnel.pem socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [iPerfC] accept = 5001 connect = 12.50.0.26:5010 [iPerfS] accept = 5020 connect = 127.0.0.1:5002 **************************** Regards, Dippen

1 0

Stunnel 4.24 patch to allow stunnel to search for the OCSP responder within an X.509 certificate's AIA extension.
by Bruce Keats 24 Jul '08

24 Jul '08

Hi all, This patch also fixes a problem with stunnel accepting an "unknown" response as "good" and allows the connection to be setup. An OCSP responder can return one of three responses (good, revoked, unknown), however the code would accept "unknown" as good. This patch fixes that problem and treats an "unknown" response as a failure. Stunnel can query an OCSP responder to determine the revocation status of a certificate when stunnel is verifying the certificate. The code works great, however it is uses a preconfigured OCSP responder. The OCSP responder's IP/hostname is specified in the stunnel configuration file as a URI. I found this rather restrictive, so I added code to extract the OCSP responder's URI from the certificate. As per RFC 3280, one of the valid extensions for X.509 certificate is the Authority Information Access (AIA) where the "accessMethod" can be "is-ad-ocsp" to identify the OCSP responders location as per RFC2560. There can be more than one OCSP responder listed in the AIA because it is a sequence. Each location is queried in the order they appear within the certificate until either a "good" or "revoked" response is received. If an "known" response or a failure then the next OCSP responder is checked. If all OCSP responder queries result in failure then the validation also fails.. A new configuration option "OCSPaia" was added. If the "OCSPaia=yes" then the stunnel will look for the OCSP responder(s) within the certificate's AIA. The locally configured "OCSP=<url>" overrides the OCSPaia option. Bruce

1 0

Wrong documentation
by Sandeep Kumar 24 Jul '08

24 Jul '08

Look at this page http://www.stunnel.org/faq/stunnel.html#configuration_file In service level options section, under the explanation of "CRLpath" it is said that all files in it should be of the form XXXXXXXX.0. But my stunnnel setup worked only when i names as XXXXXXXX.r0 instead of XXXXXXXX.0. -- Sandeep Kumar http://students.iiit.ac.in/~sandeep_kr

1 0

help with stunnel port forwarding
by vinod bhasi 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

Hi, Please help me with stunnel port forwarding . My apache is running at port 8000 .I want this to be forwarded to 80 so that normal users dont need to specify the port number . Can anyone help me with the configuration in both client and server side .Im confused as stunnel wont run with same port used by apache. Any help will be appreciated Thanks in advancve Vinod Bhasi Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Go to http://in.webmessenger.yahoo.com/

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 13
by Patrick Dung 21 Jul '08

21 Jul '08

Message: 3 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:34:22 +0200 From: Micha? Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mobi-com.net> Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Problem with Solaris 10u5 x86 and Stunnel 4.25 To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net Message-ID: <2a3f79f5f6dd65f2ced02b2e9929368b(a)mirt.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" http://stunnel.mirt.net/pipermail/stunnel-users/2008-June/002021.html Mike On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:53:17 -0700 (PDT), Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(a)yahoo.com.hk> wrote: > Hi > > I use this to compile stunnel: > The gcc and openssl is from Solaris SFW. > > # export CC=/usr/sfw/bin/gcc > # ./configure --with-threads=pthread --with-ssl=/usr/sfw > --localstatedir=/var > > After installing and starting stunnel, I found there are mutiple stunnel > processes. > There is a PID file which store one of the stunnel process. > I have tried to kill that PID, stunnel is bring down. > But there other stunnel processes running. > > Any ideas? > > Regards > Patrick > > > > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users I see. Thanks for reply. Yesterday, I have tried to compile stunnel with Sun Studio. It got problem linking with libwrap, so I turned off libwrap support. And it compile (without knowing there is a libwrap patch) and there is only one single running stunnel process. Regards Patrick

1 0

stunnel exits silently on startup
by Luis López de Quintana 21 Jul '08

21 Jul '08

Problem: stunnel doesn't run: ldq@ldq:~$ stunnel4 /etc/stunnel.cnf ldq@ldq:~$ ps aux | grep stunnel ldq 15683 0.0 0.0 2332 1392 pts/0 S+ 11:08 0:00 man stunnel ldq 25289 0.0 0.0 1776 608 pts/1 S+ 11:59 0:00 grep stunnel stunnel.cnf: ldq@ldq:~$ cat /etc/stunnel.cnf client = yes debug = debug [nntps] accept = 127.0.0.1:1109 connect = news.giganews.com:443 Version: stunnel 4.140-5ubuntu1 libc6 ldq@ldq:~$ uname -a Linux ldq 2.6.18.5 SMP Thu May 8 01:31:23 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- LdQ

2 2

Problem with Solaris 10u5 x86 and Stunnel 4.25
by Patrick Dung 19 Jul '08

19 Jul '08

Hi I use this to compile stunnel: The gcc and openssl is from Solaris SFW. # export CC=/usr/sfw/bin/gcc # ./configure --with-threads=pthread --with-ssl=/usr/sfw --localstatedir=/var After installing and starting stunnel, I found there are mutiple stunnel processes. There is a PID file which store one of the stunnel process. I have tried to kill that PID, stunnel is bring down. But there other stunnel processes running. Any ideas? Regards Patrick

1 0

Config Sanity Check
by Caplan, Michael 19 Jul '08

19 Jul '08

Hi There, I am working through an issue with a script that builds a socket connection to stunnel. Stunnel is being used to relay to an Apache web server. I'm building a localhost TCP connection on port 54322, and writing my HTTP data. When reading data back from the socket connection in my script I'm sometimes getting nothing, and other times getting the proper result. I can confirm that the web server is always receiving the request and returning a proper response. Wireshark shows SSL data being transmitted and received, so stunnel is doing its thing. However, the response does not seem to be relayed to my script on the other side of stunnel *sometimes*. My hunch is that I am doing something wrong with my script, but I am hoping that an stunnel guru can rule out any oddities with my stunnel setup. My config is below as well as the output of my log file. Any thoughts? Thanks! Mike cert = connector.pem debug = 7 output = c:\ssl.log ; Some performance tunings socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [registerserver] client = yes accept =54321 connect =www.int.ddx.com:443 [connector2server] client = yes accept =54322 connect =asd.int.ddx.com:443 [server2connector] accept = 54323 connect = 9000 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: SSL context initialized for service registerserver 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: SSL context initialized for service connector2server 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: SSL context initialized for service server2connector 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: SSL context initialized for service test 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG5[13648:13748]: stunnel 4.25 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG5[13648:13748]: Threading:WIN32 SSL:ENGINE Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 2008.07.18 21:41:46 LOG7[13476:13096]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: SSL context initialized for service registerserver 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: SSL context initialized for service connector2server 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: SSL context initialized for service server2connector 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: SSL context initialized for service test 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG5[13476:13096]: stunnel 4.25 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG5[13476:13096]: Threading:WIN32 SSL:ENGINE Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 Please consider the environment before printing this email. E-mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Henry Schein is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message. The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.

1 0

Difference between verify level 2 and 3
by Sandeep Kumar 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

Hi, I searched a lot on google, in the archives, and in the FAQ page, but could not find the differences between verify levels 2 and 3, other than the one line explanation given on the FAQ/man page. Specifically, I want to ask: 1. Is verify level 3 same as 2, but asks for client certificates as well? (Seems unlikely but still..) 2. Since verify level 2 also demands CApath/CAfile to be present, then it also is ultimately verifying against locally installed certs, which is supposed to be level 3's behaviour? Thanks & regards, Sandeep Kumar http://web.iiit.ac.in/~sandeep_kr

2 2

stunnel-portforwarding
by vinod bhasi 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

Hi All, I am a newbie as far as stunnel is concerned. I need help urgently on how to do port forwarding with Stunnel. Any help is appreciated. Thanks and Regards, Vinod Bhasi Save all your chat conversations. Find them online at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users