stunnel-users

3306 discussions

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel client connecting to host with dynamic
by Adamson H 13 Feb '09

13 Feb '09

>Adamson H wrote: >> Hi, stunnel 4.26 solves a number of issues running on FreeBSD. However, >> a stunnel client still has a problem reconnecting to a host with dynamic >> DNS service after the host IP has changed. Stunnel client seems unaware >> of the host update, pointing the dynamic DNS name to the old outdated >> IP. In order to get reconnected to the host, I have to create a cron >> script to detect the IP change and restart stunnel on the stunnel >> client. My client conf file has the following: >> >> [1873] >> accept = 1873 >> connect = hostname.dynaip.org:1873 >> >> The ip of hostname.dynaip.org changes at a random interval. > >The solution is: >delay = yes > >Best regards, >Mike >_______________________________________________ >stunnel-users mailing list >stunnel-users(a)mirt.net <mailto:[email protected]> >http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users I added delay = yes to my stunnel client conf file and removed the cron script. The rsync job (873) failed after the IP of the stunnel host had changed. I had to manually restart stunnel to get the job done and put the cron script back again. delay = yes does not with work with ddns. Regards, Adamson H

3 4

stunnel hanging (libwrap)
by Ulrich Wisser 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Hi, on my current project I have a strange error. Stunnel will work for months and suddenly stop accepting connections. At other times it will fail after a couple of hours. It doesn't crash. Connections are still accepted, but no SSL negotiation does take place. Please find a log below. It seems to be some problem with libwrap. As you can see in the logs the last usage of libwrap doesn't release libwrap properly. "Released libwrap process" log statement is missing. And after that just everything hangs waiting for libwrap. But why is this happening? Our host.allow and host.deny files are empty. libwrap is supposed to allow everything. Any suggestions are welcome! Thanks in advance Ulrich 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=22 from 212.227.111.32:59551 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: FD 22 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: Acquired libwrap process #4 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: Releasing libwrap process #4 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: Released libwrap process #4 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: epp permitted by libwrap from 212.227.111.32:59551 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG5[24594:3082640272]: epp accepted connection from 212.227.111.32:59551 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server done A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: Socket closed on read 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: SSL write shutdown 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: SSL alert (write): warning: close notify 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG6[24594:3082918800]: SSL socket closed on SSL_shutdown 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: Socket write shutdown 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG5[24594:3082918800]: Connection closed: 2249 bytes sent to SSL, 1169 bytes sent to socket 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: epp finished (5 left) 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client key exchange A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read finished A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write finished A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 36 items in the session cache 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 0 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 0 client connects that finished 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 292 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 290 server connects that finished 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 41 session cache hits 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 1 session cache misses 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: 6 session cache timeouts 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG6[24594:3082709904]: SSL accepted: new session negotiated 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG6[24594:3082709904]: Negotiated ciphers: AES256-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AES(256) Mac=SHA1 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: FD 16 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: epp connecting 127.0.0.1:9777 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: connect_wait: waiting 10 seconds 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: connect_wait: connected 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG5[24594:3082709904]: epp connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:40831 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: Remote FD=16 initialized 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082709904]: TCP_NODELAY option set on remote socket 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client key exchange A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read finished A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write finished A 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 37 items in the session cache 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 0 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 0 client connects that finished 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 292 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 291 server connects that finished 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 41 session cache hits 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 1 session cache misses 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: 6 session cache timeouts 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG6[24594:3082640272]: SSL accepted: new session negotiated 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG6[24594:3082640272]: Negotiated ciphers: AES256-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AES(256) Mac=SHA1 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: FD 18 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: epp connecting 127.0.0.1:9777 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: connect_wait: waiting 10 seconds 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: connect_wait: connected 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG5[24594:3082640272]: epp connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:40832 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: Remote FD=18 initialized 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3082640272]: TCP_NODELAY option set on remote socket 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: Socket closed on read 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: SSL write shutdown 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: SSL alert (write): warning: close notify 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG6[24594:3083127696]: SSL socket closed on SSL_shutdown 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: Socket write shutdown 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG5[24594:3083127696]: Connection closed: 2249 bytes sent to SSL, 1169 bytes sent to socket 2009.02.10 09:23:16 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: epp finished (4 left) 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=15 from 62.116.129.3:3503 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: FD 15 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: Acquired libwrap process #4 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=17 from 62.116.129.3:3504 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: FD 17 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3082918800]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2009.02.10 09:23:30 LOG7[24594:3083127696]: Releasing libwrap process #4 2009.02.10 09:23:45 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=23 from 62.116.129.3:35076 2009.02.10 09:23:45 LOG7[24594:3082779536]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:23:45 LOG7[24594:3082779536]: FD 23 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:23:45 LOG7[24594:3082779536]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2009.02.10 09:23:45 LOG7[24594:3082779536]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2009.02.10 09:23:48 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=24 from 212.209.10.53:4853 2009.02.10 09:23:48 LOG7[24594:3083058064]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:23:48 LOG7[24594:3083058064]: FD 24 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:23:48 LOG7[24594:3083058064]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2009.02.10 09:23:48 LOG7[24594:3083058064]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2009.02.10 09:24:01 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=25 from 62.116.129.3:35084 2009.02.10 09:24:01 LOG7[24594:3082570640]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:24:01 LOG7[24594:3082570640]: FD 25 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:24:01 LOG7[24594:3082570640]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2009.02.10 09:24:01 LOG7[24594:3082570640]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2009.02.10 09:24:50 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=26 from 91.203.4.58:3814 2009.02.10 09:24:50 LOG7[24594:3082501008]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:24:50 LOG7[24594:3082501008]: FD 26 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:24:50 LOG7[24594:3082501008]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2009.02.10 09:24:50 LOG7[24594:3082501008]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2009.02.10 09:25:29 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=27 from 87.96.215.128:34595 2009.02.10 09:25:29 LOG7[24594:3082431376]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:25:29 LOG7[24594:3082431376]: FD 27 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.10 09:25:29 LOG7[24594:3082431376]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2009.02.10 09:25:29 LOG7[24594:3082431376]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2009.02.10 09:25:40 LOG7[24594:3083130544]: epp accepted FD=28 from 195.249.40.26:36799 2009.02.10 09:25:40 LOG7[24594:3082361744]: epp started 2009.02.10 09:25:40 LOG7[24594:3082361744]: FD 28 in non-blocking mode

2 1

stunnel client connecting to host with dynamic dns service
by Adamson H 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Hi, stunnel 4.26 solves a number of issues running on FreeBSD. However, a stunnel client still has a problem reconnecting to a host with dynamic DNS service after the host IP has changed. Stunnel client seems unaware of the host update, pointing the dynamic DNS name to the old outdated IP. In order to get reconnected to the host, I have to create a cron script to detect the IP change and restart stunnel on the stunnel client. My client conf file has the following: [1873] accept = 1873 connect = hostname.dynaip.org:1873 The ip of hostname.dynaip.org changes at a random interval. Please help. Adamosn H

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel via proxy CONNECT
by Michal Trojnara 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

kommersz wrote: > My understanding was that there was a patch merged into Stunnel codeline > with version 4.05 a long time ago which allows the parameters > "httpsproxy_dest" and some others to be used when specifying a [https] > connection in stunnel.conf. Your understanding is not correct, but similar functionality was re-implemented from scratch. You may consider Reading The Fine Manual at: http://stunnel.mirt.net/static/stunnel.html The relevant part is: protocol = proto application protocol to negotiate SSL currently supported: cifs, connect, imap, nntp, pop3, smtp protocolAuthentication = auth_type authentication type for protocol negotiations currently supported: basic, NTLM Currently authentication type only applies to 'connect' protocol. default: basic protocolHost = host:port destination address for protocol negotiations protocolPassword = password password for protocol negotiations protocolUsername = username username for protocol negotiations Best regards, Mike

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel tls wrapper/proxy for xmpp
by C.J. Adams-Collier 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:20:18PM -0800, Brian Hatch wrote: > Roughly around 2009-02-02 13:31 -0800, C.J. Adams-Collier broached: > > > I'm new here, and I didn't see anything relating to this after a quick > > glance at the archives. I'd like to start a stunnel connection > > connected to the google talk server and then connect finch up to that > > so that I can tap the clear xmpp session using tcpdump. Can one of > > you help me? > > 5222 requires starttls for xmpp, which stunnel doesn't support. > > 5223 is wrapped ssl and would work for you. Thanks Brian, That almost works, too! I think google only does TLS (5222) though. 23:01:03.594856 IP colliertech.org.35052 > od-in-f83.google.com.5223: S 2704797155:2704797155(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 133784958 0,nop,wscale 1> 23:01:06.591987 IP colliertech.org.35052 > od-in-f83.google.com.5223: S 2704797155:2704797155(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 133785708 0,nop,wscale 1> Was there a silent "yet" at the end of your "doesn't support" comment above? :) Do you need beta testers for this new feature? Cheers, C.J. > > -- > Brian Hatch Error 23 occurred when > Systems and attempting to report > Security Engineer error 23. > http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ > > Every message PGP signed

4 7

Error message vista
by Reinier van der Gugten 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Hi, I use Stunnel for some of my customers. However I tried it myself (after a while, and after a reinstall of windows) and I get this error. Can anyone tell me how to get it to work again? I get the same error when I run it as administrator, or when I change the port from 443 to 4430. 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: PRNG seeded successfully 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: Certificate: stunnel.pem 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: Certificate loaded 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: Key file: stunnel.pem 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: Private key loaded 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5668]: SSL context initialized for service SQLServer 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG5[2828:5668]: stunnel 4.26 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8i 15 Sep 2008 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG5[2828:5668]: Threading:WIN32 SSL:ENGINE Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG5[2828:5672]: No limit detected for the number of clients 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5672]: FD 224 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG7[2828:5672]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG3[2828:5672]: Error binding SQLServer to 127.0.0.1:31433 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG3[2828:5672]: bind: Permission denied (WSAEACCES) (10013) 2009.02.04 13:54:04 LOG3[2828:5672]: Server is down My stunnel.conf looks like this (actual IP address has been modified): ; Sample stunnel configuration file by Michal Trojnara 2002-2006 ; Some options used here may not be adequate for your particular configuration ; Certificate/key is needed in server mode and optional in client mode ; The default certificate is provided only for testing and should not ; be used in a production environment cert = stunnel.pem ;key = stunnel.pem ; Some performance tunings socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 ; Authentication stuff ;verify = 2 ; Don't forget to c_rehash CApath ;CApath = certs ; It's often easier to use CAfile ;CAfile = certs.pem ; Don't forget to c_rehash CRLpath ;CRLpath = crls ; Alternatively you can use CRLfile ;CRLfile = crls.pem ; Some debugging stuff useful for troubleshooting debug = 7 ;output = stunnel.log ; Use it for client mode client = yes ; Service-level configuration [SQLServer] accept = 127.0.0.1:31433 connect = 85.15.135.121:443 ; In case of a proxy server, use: ;connect = 10.3.2.50:8080 ;protocol = connect ;protocolHost = 85.15.135.121:443

2 1

crl next update field functionality seems incorrect
by Steve Hoffman 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Regarding this piece of code in verify.c: if(X509_cmp_current_time(next_update)<0) { s_log(LOG_WARNING, "Found CRL is expired - " "revoking all certificates until you get updated CRL"); X509_STORE_CTX_set_error(callback_ctx, X509_V_ERR_CRL_HAS_EXPIRED); X509_OBJECT_free_contents(&obj); return 0; /* reject connection */ } I don't believe this is correct functionality. The "next update" field is not an expiration of the CRL, but more of an indicator that you, as the holder of the CRL, should obtain a new one. Snippet from this link: http://www.netscape.ca/browser/netscape8/help/en/ssl_help.html#next_update About the "Next Update" Date The browser uses the CRLs it has available to check the validity of certificates issued by the corresponding CAs. If a certificate is listed as revoked, the browser won't accept it as evidence of identity. A CA typically publishes an updated CRL at regular intervals. Every CRL includes a date, specified in the Next Update field, by which the CA will publish the next update of that CRL. In general, if the date in the Next Update field is earlier than the current date, you should obtain the most recent version of the CRL. To view CRL information and set up automatic CRL updating, see Viewing and Managing CRLs. CAs are required to produce a new CRL by the Next Update date. However, the absence of the most recent CRL does not by itself invalidate a certificate. For this reason, if the most recent CRL is not available, a certificate may be validated even though the most recent CRL shows it as expired. Automatic CRL updating can help to avoid this situation. I'd like to suggest removing this check. Thanks, Steve

3 2

error compilation stunnel-4.11 for ARM9
by mailinglist 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Did you ever receive a answer for your problem. Ic have the same problem now. checking for socklen_t... yes configure: **************************************** PTY device files checking for "/dev/ptmx"... configure: error: cannot check for file existence when cross compiling Thanks in advance for you help Ebse

1 0

stunnel tls wrapper/proxy for xmpp
by C.J. Adams-Collier 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Hey all, I'm new here, and I didn't see anything relating to this after a quick glance at the archives. I'd like to start a stunnel connection connected to the google talk server and then connect finch up to that so that I can tap the clear xmpp session using tcpdump. Can one of you help me? Thanks in advance, C.J. cjac@sh0:~/stunnel$ cat stunnel.conf client = yes connect = el-in-f125.google.com:5222 foreground = yes pid = /tmp/stunnel4.pid debug = 7 cjac@sh0:~/stunnel$ stunnel-4.26/src/stunnel stunnel.conf 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG6[24798:140190659815120]: Unable to retrieve any random data from /home/cjac/.rnd 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: Wrote 0 new random bytes to /home/cjac/.rnd 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: PRNG seeded successfully 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: SSL context initialized for service stunnel 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG5[24798:140190659815120]: stunnel 4.26 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG5[24798:140190659815120]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: stunnel started 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: FD 0 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: FD 1 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: FD 4 in non-blocking mode 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: stunnel connecting 209.85.163.125:5222 2009.02.02 21:31:13 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: connect_wait: waiting 10 seconds 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: connect_wait: connected 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG5[24798:140190659815120]: stunnel connected remote server from 172.16.9.3:55967 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: Remote FD=4 initialized 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: SSL alert (write): fatal: handshake failure 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG3[24798:140190659815120]: SSL_connect: 1408F10B: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG5[24798:140190659815120]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2009.02.02 21:31:14 LOG7[24798:140190659815120]: stunnel finished (0 left)

2 1

Fwd: Stunnel & Zimbra
by Allen 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Hi folks, I'm reposting this from my email address on file, because it was initially rejected (I think because I sent it from my main business address, which is not the address I have listed with this group. My apologies. ------------ I've been using stunnel with Zimbra, on OS X Sever since last year and it's been working well (SSL tunnels should be seen and not heard ;-). I upgraded Zimbra yesterday to a new version, that apparently was supposed to fix its instability running on the OS X platform. However, the upgrade wound up breaking the mail server's ability to send email. From Zimbra's web client, it appears like mail is getting sent (there's a little green sent mail box that pops up right after you click on the send button). Mail never arrives at the client end. I can still receive mail into the Zimbra account when I send to it from my business or personal email account. I provisoned and reloaded posffix, etc., and still can't receive mail on the other end. No stunnel settings have changed since before the upgrade. Here are the stunnel-related file outputs: ----------------------------------------------------------------- root# cat /opt/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf client = yes foreground = no [smtps] accept = 5000 connect = server_name.x.y.com:465 (server name changed to protect the innocent ;-) ----------------------------------------------------------------- cat /opt/zimbra/conf/relay_password server_name.domain.com [email protected]:fakepassword --------------------------------------------- With the real usernames, password, domains, etc., those two (above) stunnel files worked perfectly well with stunnel, and sending mail was not a problem. That was --until I upgraded Zimbra. I realize that this is a stunnel forum and the Zimbra-related forum deals with all their issues. However, I'm wondering if somebody out there in stunnel land might have a light bulb going off regarding this issue. Perhaps there's something that I'm overlooking? Thanks! Allen

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users