stunnel-users

3306 discussions

stunnel and loading keys from hw devices
by Victor Wagner 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

Hello, all I've tried to use stunnel with keys on the hardware device, supported by OpenSSL engine and encountered some minor problems: 1. Under Unix systems stunnel doesn't provide UI_METHOD for ENGINE_load_private_key. It passes NULL there and engine complains that no user interface provided. On Unix in many cases default UI_METHOD provided by OpenSSL would do So, replacing line 302 in the ctx.c (line number are given for release 4.33) from uim=NULL ; to uim=UI_OpenSSL(); would significanly improve stunnel functionality. 2. OpenSSL UI objects have two methods to pass arbitraty pointers along 1. generic ex_data based macros UI_set_app_data/UI_get_app_data 2. UI-specific UI_add_user_data/UI_get0_user_data Unfortunately app-specific pointer is set inside engine and retrieved inside a callback, which belongs to application. So author of an engine and author of an application should somehow agree on which metod to use. All engines shipped with OpenSSL (ones which do provide load_private_key method) use UI_add_user_data to pass data to the callback. stunnel's pin_cb (for Win32 version of stunnel in the gui.c) uses UI_get_app_data to retrieve ui_data. I wonder what engine was used when this code was developed and debugged. And it does no check if any meaningful pointer is obtained. I suggest to add following code after line 602 in gui.c: /* if set_app_Data haven't-return anything */ if (!ui_data) ui_data=UI_get0_user_data(ui); /* if still no avail */ if (!ui_data) { s_log(LOG_ERR,"Engine haven't passed our callback data to callback. Sorry!"); return 0; } Or instead of complaining we can use some structure, local to function pin_cb as fallback UI_DATA - just as password buffer, and check if ui_data->section is not NULL before reading ui_data->section->key in the pass_proc (line 543 of gui.c) Thus it would work even with really broken engines which do not pass userdata from ENGINE_load_private_key to UI callbacks at all. ----- End forwarded message -----

2 1

stunnel and mod_gnutls
by Yclept Nemo 15 Aug '10

15 Aug '10

I run a mod_gnutls (0.5.5)<->apache (2.2.8) webserver which behaves perfectly normally outside of stunnel: GnuTLSEnable on GnuTLSPriorities SECURE256 GnuTLSExportCertificates on .. When a connection is closed and apache signals the mod_gnutls process to quit, the log records: GnuTLS: Handshake Failed (-8) 'A record packet with illegal version was received.' Invalid method in request NS * HTTP/1.0 ::1 - - [15/Aug/2010:03:31:26 -0400] "NS * HTTP/1.0" 501 512 "-" "Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) ... (internal dummy connection)" This lets me easily identify apache2 process turnovers However, when I connect to this server through stunnel, I receive random dropouts. For example, if I were to upload 200 test files to this server, on average 15 transfers would fail. Stunnel logs (excerpt): 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG5[29287:3074030448]: Connection reset: 94 bytes sent to SSL, 523 bytes sent to socket 2010.08.15 04:12:21 LOG5[29287:3074448240]: Connection reset: 94 bytes sent to SSL, 523 bytes sent to socket 2010.08.15 04:12:34 LOG5[29287:3074030448]: Connection reset: 94 bytes sent to SSL, 523 bytes sent to socket And my apache2 logs are flooded with: Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01 # ... over and over and over ... Invalid method in request \x16\x03\x01 # ... this is a tls hello sequence, as though the webserver were not running mod_gnutls ::1 - - [15/Aug/2010:03:31:26 -0400] "NS * HTTP/1.0" 501 512 "-" "Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) ... (internal dummy connection)" The apache logs show new apache2 processes / new ssl connections being created every 2-5 seconds. A normal connections lasts much longer. stunnel configuration debug=7 foreground=yes client=yes syslog=no pid=/absolute/path/to/stunnel.pid libwrap=no [https] accept=127.0.0.1:11111 connect=my.website.net:myport sslVersion=TLSv1 an excerpt from the stunnel log: 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG6[29287:3074030448]: SSL connected: previous session reused 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: Service https started 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: FD=19 in non-blocking mode 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG5[29287:3073960816]: Service https accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:52674 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: FD=20 in non-blocking mode 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG6[29287:3073960816]: connect_blocking: connecting 44.205.51.83:12389 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait 44.205.51.83:12389: waiting 10 seconds 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG5[29287:3073960816]: connect_blocking: connected 44.205.51.83:12389 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG5[29287:3073960816]: Service https connected remote server from 192.168.1.8:51590 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: Remote FD=20 initialized 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 1 items in the session cache 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 42 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 42 client connects that finished 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 0 server connects that finished 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 41 session cache hits 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 0 external session cache hits 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 0 session cache misses 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: 0 session cache timeouts 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG6[29287:3073960816]: SSL connected: previous session reused 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG3[29287:3074030448]: SSL socket closed on SSL_read with 7 byte(s) in buffer 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG5[29287:3074030448]: Connection reset: 94 bytes sent to SSL, 523 bytes sent to socket 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3074030448]: Service https finished (4 left) 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: SSL socket closed on SSL_read 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: Socket write shutdown 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG5[29287:3073960816]: Connection closed: 94 bytes sent to SSL, 523 bytes sent to socket 2010.08.15 04:11:25 LOG7[29287:3073960816]: Service https finished (3 left) 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074448240]: SSL socket closed on SSL_read 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074448240]: Socket write shutdown 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG5[29287:3074448240]: Connection closed: 1110 bytes sent to SSL, 77962 bytes sent to socket 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074517872]: SSL socket closed on SSL_read 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074517872]: Socket write shutdown 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074448240]: Service https finished (2 left) 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG5[29287:3074517872]: Connection closed: 575 bytes sent to SSL, 4889 bytes sent to socket 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074517872]: Service https finished (1 left) 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: SSL socket closed on SSL_read 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: Socket write shutdown 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG5[29287:3074378608]: Connection closed: 573 bytes sent to SSL, 48787 bytes sent to socket 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: Service https finished (0 left) 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074520768]: Service https accepted FD=11 from 127.0.0.1:52676 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: Service https started 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: FD=11 in non-blocking mode 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG5[29287:3074378608]: Service https accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:52676 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: FD=12 in non-blocking mode 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG6[29287:3074378608]: connect_blocking: connecting 44.205.51.83:12389 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait 44.205.51.83:12389: waiting 10 seconds 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG5[29287:3074378608]: connect_blocking: connected 44.205.51.83:12389 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG5[29287:3074378608]: Service https connected remote server from 192.168.1.8:51592 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: Remote FD=12 initialized 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2010.08.15 04:11:26 LOG7[29287:3074378608]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data My questions are: Why does this happen (why only with stunnel), and how can I prevent/avoid this? Sincerely,

2 2

help - SSL bandwidth overhead with using different ciphers
by Slim Ben Mahmoud 30 Jul '10

30 Jul '10

Dear SSL experts, In order to assess the performances of an adaptive security algorithm using SSL, I need to measure the network overhead induced by the establishment of SSL tunnels. The experiment aims to measure the bandwidth consumptions (or throughputs) when SSL tunnels are established using the different ciphers implemented in Stunnel (AES256-SHA or RC4-SHA for instance). Do you think that I have to expect a different throughput when I use different ciphers for every tunnels or the overhead is the pretty much the same? In fact, the first results show no difference between the throughputs no matter the cipher I use. I know that SSL overhead is traditionally measured in delay or latency because of the handshake phase (the encryption process time is negligible on the new CPUs) but this is not what i want to show. I hope that my request is enough clear, let me know if it is not the case. Best regards. --Slim

2 1

Proxy for content filtering
by Raj 29 Jul '10

29 Jul '10

Hi All I want to build a proxy server, which acts as man in the middle proxy. The main intention of application is to do content filtering, whether it is an http or https request. I want to block some specified URL. Can anybody tell me what is the best approach of doing this Thanks, Raj Rajmohan SK

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel-users Digest, Vol 72, Issue 2
by TONY WESTENHOFER 07 Jul '10

07 Jul '10

stunnel-users-request(a)mirt.net wrote: >Send stunnel-users mailing list submissions to > stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > stunnel-users-request(a)mirt.net > >You can reach the person managing the list at > stunnel-users-owner(a)mirt.net > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of stunnel-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: telnetd and tcp_wrappers (Spence, Thomas Civ 844 CS/SCOX) > 2. change openssl version with configure (Bhavna Jhunjhunwala) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:28:11 -0400 >From: "Spence, Thomas Civ 844 CS/SCOX" <Thomas.Spence(a)pentagon.af.mil> >Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] telnetd and tcp_wrappers >To: "stunnel-users(a)mirt.net" <stunnel-users(a)mirt.net> >Message-ID: > <751B1F405F4AFF4D907BD567538A83FB04FFE0B6DA(a)tequilasunrise.pentagon.ncr.ds.af.mil> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >2 guys did help me and still no luck... > >Anyone who tried this: > >[tssl] >accept = 992 >exec = /usr/sbin/telnetd > >Let me know... Reason why I am asking you because when I log off the server then stunnel's process stopped running but I want it keep running after logoff. Before I changed 'exec = /usr/sbin/telnetd', it was 'connect = 23' and the stunnel's process ran great and never stop running... Strange. > >I really need your help. Thanks. > >--------------- >Tom Spence >ABIDES SYSTEM SUPPORT >844th CS/SCOX > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:41:42 -0400 >From: Bhavna Jhunjhunwala <bhavnaj(a)quantitativebrokers.com> >Subject: [stunnel-users] change openssl version with configure >To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net >Message-ID: > <AANLkTikGWuO2XbF8-rtOTMyfeHVdeUV8TZGJvmYfKekB(a)mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Hi, > >I have stunnel version as below installed on Mac: > >s*tunnel 4.33 on i386-apple-darwin10.2.0 with OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009* >*Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP* >* * >*Global options* >*debug = daemon.notice* >*pid = /usr/local/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid* >*RNDbytes = 64* >*RNDfile = /dev/urandom* >*RNDoverwrite = yes* >* * >*Service-level options* >*cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem* >*ciphers = ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL:!SSLv2* >*session = 300 seconds* >*stack = 65536 bytes* >*sslVersion = SSLv3 for client, all for server* >*TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds* >*TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds* >*TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds* >*TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds* >*verify = none* > >I would like to upgrade the openssl version to 1.0.0a, so I do >./configure --with-ssl=dir >make >make install > >After make install i get below error: > >*make install* >*Making install in src* >*test -z "/usr/local/bin" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/bin"* >* /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c 'stunnel' >'/usr/local/bin/stunnel'* >*/usr/bin/install -c stunnel /usr/local/bin/stunnel* >*test -z "/usr/local/bin" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/bin"* >* /usr/bin/install -c 'stunnel3' '/usr/local/bin/stunnel3'* >*test -z "/usr/local/lib/stunnel" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d >"/usr/local/lib/stunnel"* >* /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c 'libstunnel.la' >'/usr/local/lib/stunnel/libstunnel.la'* >*/usr/bin/install -c .libs/libstunnel.dylib >/usr/local/lib/stunnel/libstunnel.dylib* >*/usr/bin/install -c .libs/libstunnel.lai /usr/local/lib/stunnel/ >libstunnel.la* >*----------------------------------------------------------------------* >*Libraries have been installed in:* >* /usr/local/lib/stunnel* >* >* >*If you ever happen to want to link against installed libraries* >*in a given directory, LIBDIR, you must either use libtool, and* >*specify the full pathname of the library, or use the `-LLIBDIR'* >*flag during linking and do at least one of the following:* >* - add LIBDIR to the `DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH' environment variable* >* during execution* >* >* >*See any operating system documentation about shared libraries for* >*more information, such as the ld(1) and ld.so(8) manual pages.* >*----------------------------------------------------------------------* >*make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.* >*Making install in doc* >*make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.* >*test -z "/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d >"/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel"* >* /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'stunnel.html' >'/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel/stunnel.html'* >* /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'stunnel.pl.html' >'/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel/stunnel.pl.html'* >* /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'stunnel.fr.html' >'/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel/stunnel.fr.html'* >*test -z "/usr/local/share/man/man8" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d >"/usr/local/share/man/man8"* >*mkdir: /usr/local/share/man/man8: Permission denied* >*make[2]: *** [install-man8] Error 1* >*make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2* > > > >and when I check the stunnel version it still uses the old ssl version. >Am I doing something wrong here? > >-- >Thanks, >Bhavna >Quantitative Brokers >646 293 1808 > > >DISCLAIMER: >This e-mail and any attachments are for the confidential use of the >intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this >message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, >distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This >communication is for information purposes only and should not be >regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy >any investment product, an official confirmation of any transaction >or an official statement of Quantitative Brokers, LLC. > >E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. >Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or >accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. > >All information is subject to change without notice. >Quantitative Brokers may, at its discretion, monitor and review the >content of all e-mail communications. >

1 0

problem with "verify=0"
by wujot＠home.pl 07 Jul '10

07 Jul '10

Hello everybody, The basic SSL negotiation requires the exchange of nine SSL messages. If client authentication is required, server can send additional message "certificate request". But this message is optional. I'm using stunnel ver. 4.27 for Win and 4.28 for Linux. In both cases stunnel, working as server, is sending "certificate request" message to the client, regardless of "verify" state, even with "verify=0". When "verify=0", server doesn't care about client's certificate. So, what for server sends this message? The part of my configuration and log is bellow: [test] accept = 60000 connect = 192.168.3.15:4679 client = no ;verify = 0 verify = none ciphers=DES-CBC3-SHA session = 3600 2010.07.07 12:53:35 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2010.07.07 12:53:35 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2010.07.07 12:53:35 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2010.07.07 12:53:35 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate A 2010.07.07 12:53:35 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write certificate request A <-------------???!!! 2010.07.07 12:53:35 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG6[2412:4280]: VERIFY IGNORE: depth=1, /C= .............. 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG5[2412:4280]: CRL: verification passed 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG5[2412:4280]: VERIFY OK: depth=1, /C= .......... 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG6[2412:4280]: VERIFY IGNORE: depth=0, /C= ................ 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG5[2412:4280]: CRL: verification passed 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG5[2412:4280]: VERIFY OK: depth=0, /C= .......................... 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client certificate A 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client key exchange a 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read certificate verify A 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read finished A 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2010.07.07 12:53:42 LOG7[2412:4280]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write finished A So, my question is: how to remove "certificate request" message from stunnel-as-server negotiation? Regards, Wojtek

1 0

change openssl version with configure
by Bhavna Jhunjhunwala 06 Jul '10

06 Jul '10

Hi, I have stunnel version as below installed on Mac: s*tunnel 4.33 on i386-apple-darwin10.2.0 with OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009* *Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP* * * *Global options* *debug = daemon.notice* *pid = /usr/local/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid* *RNDbytes = 64* *RNDfile = /dev/urandom* *RNDoverwrite = yes* * * *Service-level options* *cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem* *ciphers = ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL:!SSLv2* *session = 300 seconds* *stack = 65536 bytes* *sslVersion = SSLv3 for client, all for server* *TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds* *TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds* *TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds* *TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds* *verify = none* I would like to upgrade the openssl version to 1.0.0a, so I do ./configure --with-ssl=dir make make install After make install i get below error: *make install* *Making install in src* *test -z "/usr/local/bin" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/bin"* * /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c 'stunnel' '/usr/local/bin/stunnel'* */usr/bin/install -c stunnel /usr/local/bin/stunnel* *test -z "/usr/local/bin" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/bin"* * /usr/bin/install -c 'stunnel3' '/usr/local/bin/stunnel3'* *test -z "/usr/local/lib/stunnel" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/lib/stunnel"* * /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c 'libstunnel.la' '/usr/local/lib/stunnel/libstunnel.la'* */usr/bin/install -c .libs/libstunnel.dylib /usr/local/lib/stunnel/libstunnel.dylib* */usr/bin/install -c .libs/libstunnel.lai /usr/local/lib/stunnel/ libstunnel.la* *----------------------------------------------------------------------* *Libraries have been installed in:* * /usr/local/lib/stunnel* * * *If you ever happen to want to link against installed libraries* *in a given directory, LIBDIR, you must either use libtool, and* *specify the full pathname of the library, or use the `-LLIBDIR'* *flag during linking and do at least one of the following:* * - add LIBDIR to the `DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH' environment variable* * during execution* * * *See any operating system documentation about shared libraries for* *more information, such as the ld(1) and ld.so(8) manual pages.* *----------------------------------------------------------------------* *make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.* *Making install in doc* *make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.* *test -z "/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel"* * /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'stunnel.html' '/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel/stunnel.html'* * /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'stunnel.pl.html' '/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel/stunnel.pl.html'* * /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'stunnel.fr.html' '/usr/local/share/doc/stunnel/stunnel.fr.html'* *test -z "/usr/local/share/man/man8" || ../auto/install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/share/man/man8"* *mkdir: /usr/local/share/man/man8: Permission denied* *make[2]: *** [install-man8] Error 1* *make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2* and when I check the stunnel version it still uses the old ssl version. Am I doing something wrong here? -- Thanks, Bhavna Quantitative Brokers 646 293 1808 DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are for the confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment product, an official confirmation of any transaction or an official statement of Quantitative Brokers, LLC. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice. Quantitative Brokers may, at its discretion, monitor and review the content of all e-mail communications.

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] telnetd and tcp_wrappers
by Spence, Thomas Civ 844 CS/SCOX 06 Jul '10

06 Jul '10

2 guys did help me and still no luck... Anyone who tried this: [tssl] accept = 992 exec = /usr/sbin/telnetd Let me know... Reason why I am asking you because when I log off the server then stunnel's process stopped running but I want it keep running after logoff. Before I changed 'exec = /usr/sbin/telnetd', it was 'connect = 23' and the stunnel's process ran great and never stop running... Strange. I really need your help. Thanks. --------------- Tom Spence ABIDES SYSTEM SUPPORT 844th CS/SCOX

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] telnetd and tcp_wrappers
by Spence, Thomas Civ 844 CS/SCOX 02 Jul '10

02 Jul '10

Hi Again, I tried: [tssl] accept = 992 exec = /usr/sbin/telnetd It works. When I log into the server with no problem. When I am ready to log off then the process stopped running??? How can it stays running in process (/usr/local/bin/stunnel)? Thanks. Tom -----Original Message----- From: Spence, Thomas Civ 844 CS/SCOX Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 11:53 AM To: 'stunnel-users(a)mirt.net' Subject: telnetd and tcp_wrappers Hi all.. They requested us to turn off the telnetd from inetd.conf and not allowing to use tcp_wrappers... We are still using stunnel 4.33... We can't connect our server from PC with PowerTerm WebConnect because telnetd is off. Is there any way for all users to connect the server by using PowerTerm WebConnect? stunnel.conf: [tssl] accept = 992 connect = 23 (can't use telnet port) I know I can't use "connect = 22" because it doesn't work. Any idea? I really need your help... --------------- Tom Spence

2 1

telnetd and tcp_wrappers
by Spence, Thomas Civ 844 CS/SCOX 01 Jul '10

01 Jul '10

Hi all.. They requested us to turn off the telnetd from inetd.conf and not allowing to use tcp_wrappers... We are still using stunnel 4.33... We can't connect our server from PC with PowerTerm WebConnect because telnetd is off. Is there any way for all users to connect the server by using PowerTerm WebConnect? stunnel.conf: [tssl] accept = 992 connect = 23 (can't use telnet port) I know I can't use "connect = 22" because it doesn't work. Any idea? I really need your help... --------------- Tom Spence

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users