- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

Ubuntu version of stunnel : multiple process shown by a ps -edf, compiled from sources : one process
by Thomas Manson 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hi, To get around a bug of stunnel present in the package of Ubuntu 11.10 (that has been corrected in v4.38), I've compiled from sources (v4.53). It went well, but I did notice a change in the processes : from compiled sources, I can see only on process per conf file ###################################################################### 1 21402 21402 21402 ? -1 Ss 109 0:00 /usr/local/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/base.conf 1 21411 21411 21411 ? -1 Ss 109 0:00 /usr/local/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/extranet.serviceplus-hse.com.conf 1 21420 21420 21420 ? -1 Ss 109 0:00 /usr/local/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/mansonthomas.com.conf ###################################################################### while on the ubuntu version, I've multiple process per conf file. ps -edf from ubuntu distrib ###################################################################### 1 24773 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/base.conf 1 24774 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/base.conf 1 24775 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/base.conf 1 24776 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/base.conf 1 24777 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/base.conf 1 24778 24778 24778 ? -1 Ss 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/base.conf 1 24787 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/extranet.serviceplus-hse.com.conf 1 24788 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/extranet.serviceplus-hse.com.conf 1 24789 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/extranet.serviceplus-hse.com.conf 1 24790 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/extranet.serviceplus-hse.com.conf 1 24791 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/extranet.serviceplus-hse.com.conf 1 24792 24792 24792 ? -1 Ss 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/extranet.serviceplus-hse.com.conf 1 24801 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/mansonthomas.com.conf 1 24802 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/mansonthomas.com.conf 1 24803 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/mansonthomas.com.conf 1 24804 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/mansonthomas.com.conf 1 24805 24762 18168 ? -1 S 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/mansonthomas.com.conf 1 24806 24806 24806 ? -1 Ss 109 0:00 /usr/bin/stunnel4 /etc/stunnel/mansonthomas.com.conf ###################################################################### I'm using the exact same version of conf file for both setup... any idea why this change ? is one better than another ? Regards, Thomas.

1 0

Transparent STunnel & HAProxy on Centos6.2
by Scott McKeown 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

Hi All, I've been playing with this for a little while now and before the all in front of me and my head meet I was wondering if someone else could shed some light on this for me please. First off let me give you a over view of the network setup: My Virtual Machine has two interfaces eth0 has two addresses 192.168.82.9/18and 192.168.82.10/18. 192.168.82.9 is going to be for the management of the server and 192.168.82.10 is what the website will respond too. eth1 has a network of its own 10.0.0.0/24 and I have two Debian Apache web servers that are connected to this network 10.0.0.10 and 10.0.0.20. If this was a real world setup I might have put the management address (192.168.82.9) on a different port but I didn't think of that at the time of setting this up but I may do that later. Second what have I done! Well this is a brand new install of Centos6.2 minimal fully patched and both HAProxy and STunnel downloaded and installed. I'm using the devel version of HAProxy but thats a different story and version 4.53 of STunnel. Now the problem. Both seem to work perfectly as-long as I don't want to know who is accessing my site which make it next to useless. However, I can get HAProxy to report the IP Address of the visitor as long as you visit the HTTP page on port 80 as per my configuration file. I can also get STunnel to work with HAProxy but as soon as I enable 'protocol = proxy' the HTTPS side breaks and all I get in my browser is '400 Bad Request Your browser sent an invalid request'. I've played with everything I can thing of and I still cant get a Transparent STunnel>HAProxy solution working correctly. Config Files: stunnel.conf ====================================== chroot = /usr/local/var/lib/stunnel/ #setuid = nobody setgid = nobody pid = /stunnel.pid cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem key = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem options = NO_SSLv2 debug = 7 #fips = no [https] accept = 192.168.82.10:443 connect = 192.168.82.10:80 protocol = proxy haproxy.cfg ====================================== global daemon log /dev/log local4 maxconn 40000 ulimit-n 81000 defaults log global mode http contimeout 4000 clitimeout 42000 srvtimeout 43000 listen http1 bind 192.168.82.10:80 mode http option http-server-close option forwardfor source 0.0.0.0 usesrc clientip balance roundrobin server http1_1 10.0.0.10:80 cookie http1_1 check inter 2000 rise 2 fall 3 server http1_1 10.0.0.20:80 cookie http1_1 check inter 2000 rise 2 fall 3 Log file ====================================== Apr 5 12:37:32 lbmaster haproxy[1351]: Proxy http1 started. Apr 5 12:37:33 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1353:140163149080512]: stunnel 4.53 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu platform Apr 5 12:37:33 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1353:140163149080512]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips 29 Mar 2010 Apr 5 12:37:33 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1353:140163149080512]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:+ENGINE+OCSP+FIPS Auth:none Sockets:POLL+IPv6 Apr 5 12:37:33 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1353:140163149080512]: Reading configuration from file /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf Apr 5 12:37:33 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1353:140163149080512]: FIPS mode is enabled Apr 5 12:37:33 lbmaster stunnel: LOG6[1353:140163149080512]: Initializing service section [https] Apr 5 12:37:33 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1353:140163149080512]: Configuration successful Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1354:140163149076224]: Service [https] accepted connection from 192.168.64.10:53149 Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG6[1354:140163149076224]: connect_blocking: connecting 192.168.82.10:80 Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster haproxy[1352]: Connect from 192.168.82.10:47570 to 192.168.82.10:80 (http1/HTTP) Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1354:140163149076224]: connect_blocking: connected 192.168.82.10:80 Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1354:140163149076224]: Service [https] connected remote server from 192.168.82.10:47570 Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG6[1354:140163149076224]: Server-mode proxy protocol negotiations started Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG6[1354:140163149076224]: Server-mode proxy protocol negotiations succeeded Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG6[1354:140163149076224]: SSL accepted: new session negotiated Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG6[1354:140163149076224]: Negotiated TLSv1/SSLv3 ciphersuite: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256-bit encryption) Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG6[1354:140163149076224]: Compression: null, expansion: null Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG6[1354:140163149076224]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1354:140163149076224]: Error detected on socket (read) file descriptor: Broken pipe (32) Apr 5 12:37:41 lbmaster stunnel: LOG5[1354:140163149076224]: Connection reset: 187 byte(s) sent to SSL, 1 byte(s) sent to socket Any help would be most gracefully received and welcome. ~Yours, Scott

2 1

help
by Bill Tindal 07 Apr '12

07 Apr '12

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:00 PM, <stunnel-users-request(a)stunnel.org> wrote: > Send stunnel-users mailing list submissions to > stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > stunnel-users-request(a)stunnel.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > stunnel-users-owner(a)stunnel.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of stunnel-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [Stunnel Guru needed] stunnel running, but no longer > serve connection after a while ("Dispatching signals from the > signal pipe" in logs ==> all stops) (Thomas Manson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:24:46 +0200 > From: Thomas Manson <dev.mansonthomas(a)gmail.com> > To: Scott Gifford <sgifford(a)suspectclass.com> > Cc: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] [Stunnel Guru needed] stunnel running, > but no longer serve connection after a while ("Dispatching signals > from the signal pipe" in logs ==> all stops) > Message-ID: > <CA+PenvGYr+tTiKsavOgyaLOtoRxUo0nfxuRVDEzdvGDrFpefLg(a)mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > This bug has been corrected in > > Version 4.38, 2011.06.28, urgency: MEDIUM: > > - New features > - Server-side SNI implemented (RFC 3546 section 3.1) with a new > service-level option "nsi". > - "socket" option also accepts "yes" and "no" for flags. > - Nagle's algorithm is now disabled by default for improved > interactivity. > - Bugfixes > - A compilation fix was added for OpenSSL version < 1.0.0. > - Signal pipe set to non-blocking mode. This bug caused hangs of > stunnel features based on signals, e.g. local mode, FORK threading, or > configuration file reload on Unix. Win32 platform was not affected. > > > however it don't precise from which version it affects stunnel... so my try > with 11.04 is a bit risky, even if 4.29 is quite far from 4.38. > > Maybe upgrading to 12.04 could solve the issue, but I don't like to upgrade > right away (I had some bad surpise ;)) > > so compiling from source seems to be the safest option. > > Thomas. > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 07:58, Thomas Manson <dev.mansonthomas(a)gmail.com > >wrote: > > > i've just checked my setup right now and the funny thing is that I think > > it stopped working exactly at the same second of the same hour & minute > of > > the day : > > > > > > root@ns0:/var/log/stunnel4# ll > > total 940 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 stunnel4 stunnel4 4096 2012-04-07 06:25 . > > drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2012-04-07 06:25 .. > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 0 2012-04-07 06:25 > > extranet.serviceplus-hse.com_stunnel.log > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 926267 2012-04-07 06:25 > > extranet.serviceplus-hse.com_stunnel.log.1 > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 0 2012-04-07 06:25 > > mansonthomas.com_stunnel.log > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 5804 2012-04-07 06:25 > > mansonthomas.com_stunnel.log.1 > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 0 2012-04-07 06:25 stunnel.log > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 11710 2012-04-07 06:25 stunnel.log.1 > > root@ns0:/var/log/stunnel4# ll > > total 940 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 stunnel4 stunnel4 4096 2012-04-07 06:25 . > > drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2012-04-07 06:25 .. > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 0 2012-04-07 06:25 > > extranet.serviceplus-hse.com_stunnel.log > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 926267 2012-04-07 06:25 > > extranet.serviceplus-hse.com_stunnel.log.1 > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 0 2012-04-07 06:25 > > mansonthomas.com_stunnel.log > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 5804 2012-04-07 06:25 > > mansonthomas.com_stunnel.log.1 > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 0 2012-04-07 06:25 stunnel.log > > -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 11710 2012-04-07 06:25 stunnel.log.1 > > root@ns0:/var/log/stunnel4# tail stunnel.log.1 > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG7[4745:139677248579328]: Option TCP_NODELAY set > on > > remote socket > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG7[4745:139677248579328]: Socket closed on read > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG7[4745:139677248579328]: Sending SSL write > shutdown > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG7[4745:139677248579328]: SSL alert (write): > > warning: close notify > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG6[4745:139677248579328]: SSL_shutdown > successfully > > sent close_notify > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG7[4745:139677248579328]: SSL socket closed on > > SSL_read > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG7[4745:139677248579328]: Sending socket write > > shutdown > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG5[4745:139677248579328]: Connection closed: 206 > > bytes sent to SSL, 139 bytes sent to socket > > 2012.04.06 22:21:19 LOG7[4745:139677248579328]: Service > > https-123monsite.com finished (0 left) > > 2012.04.07 06:25:04 LOG7[4745:139677248583456]: Dispatching signals from > > the signal pipe > > root@ns0:/var/log/stunnel4# > > > > compared to my first post... : > > > > > > > > > > - 2012.04.04 06:25:04 LOG7[24778:139641780213536]: Dispatching > signals > > from the signal pipe > > - > > and at the same time (2012.04.04 06:25:04) all logs file stops : > > > > > > - root@ns0:/var/log/stunnel4# ll > > - total 128 > > - drwxr-xr-x 2 stunnel4 stunnel4 4096 2012-04-04 12:10 . > > - drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2012-04-04 06:25 .. > > - -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 98084 2012-04-04 *06:25* > > extranet.serviceplus-hse.com_stunnel.log > > - -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 4491 2012-04-04 06:25 > > mansonthomas.com_stunnel.log > > - -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 0 2012-04-04 06:25 stunnel.log > > - -rw-r----- 1 stunnel4 stunnel4 11058 2012-04-04 06:25 stunnel.log.1 > > > > > > > > I could cron a restart at the appropriate time but I think I'll compile > > from sources. > > > > Regards, > > Thomas. > > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 07:51, Thomas Manson <dev.mansonthomas(a)gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> Yes, it helps a lot ! > >> > >> I've another server running a different version of Ubuntu (11.04 where > >> stunnel version is 4.29-1 instead of 11.10 and stunnel 4.35-2build1) > >> > >> Do you think it can work on older version ? > >> > >> I was thinking to try this because I've seen some message about the same > >> symptoms after upgrade so... > >> > >> but maybe the two version are too close and I will need to compile from > >> sources... > >> > >> what do you think about this? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Thomas. > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 06:56, Scott Gifford <sgifford(a)suspectclass.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Thomas Manson < > >>> dev.mansonthomas(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi All, > >>>> > >>>> I'm really struggling to make stunnel working for more than a few > >>>> hours. (and the client is yelling hard...) (I solved some other issue > : > >>>> logging per website and making more than one stunnel works) > >>>> > >>> > >>> Hi Thomas, > >>> > >>> I was just troubleshooting what looks like a very similar issue. I > >>> believe this is fixed in a later version of stunnel, which you can get > from > >>> stunnel.org and compile yourself from source. > >>> > >>> This is the ChangeLog entry that I think addresses your problem: > >>> > >>> - Signal pipe set to non-blocking mode. This bug caused hangs of > >>> stunnel > >>> features based on signals, e.g. local mode, FORK threading, or > >>> configuration file reload on Unix. Win32 platform was not > affected. > >>> > >>> > >>> I have just updated from the official Oneiric version to this one, so I > >>> don't yet know if it will fix the problem long-term, but I think my > odds > >>> are not too bad. > >>> > >>> Hope this helps, > >>> > >>> -----Scott. > >>> > >>> > >> > > >

1 0

Looking for help - Stunnel works with Gmail but not with my provider
by Scott McKeown 05 Apr '12

05 Apr '12

Hi Pieter, What does stunnel -version show under the 'ciphers' section? Also have you tried this with the 'options = NO_SSLv3' commented out? ~Scott

2 2

Config for https server
by Ali Kabiri 05 Apr '12

05 Apr '12

I asked before but nobody answer Please I read manual but it's not clear for may task I have IP & Port with user and pass from HttpS server I want connect to server an use for tunneling like proxy server Please help me How config and connect to server?

2 1

MySQL through stunnel - fails after many days
by Whit Blauvelt 04 Apr '12

04 Apr '12

Hi, I have a Nagios plugin using an stunnel connection to a MySQL server across the LAN for frequent queries, where each one opens a fresh connection. Checking ulimit on both ends shows "unlimited" (I've found old discussions about that being a possible factor). There's nothing I've found in the logs to show where it's going wrong. It's just that after days of running fine, suddenly the queries start failing to connect through. Restarting stunnel on both ends immediately resolves the problem. I suppose I can just restart stunnel on both ends once a day from cron and be okay. But I'd rather find a real fix, if anyone recognizes what this would be and can point me to one. Thanks, Whit

2 2

Configure Stunnel 4.53 to Run on a Windows 2000 Machine?
by Jeff Salisbury 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

Greetings, we recently updated Stunnel to version 4.53 and we've discovered that Stunnel no longer runs on our Windows 2000 workstation. Here is the message in the Stunnel log: No limit detected for the number of clients stunnel 4.53 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu platform Compiled/running with OpenSSL 0.9.8s-fips 4 Jan 2012 Threading:WIN32 SSL:+ENGINE+OCSP+FIPS Auth:none Sockets:SELECT+IPv4 Reading configuration from file C:\bin\Stunnel\stunnel.conf FIPS_mode_set: 2D06C071: error:2D06C071:FIPS routines:FIPS_mode_set:unsupported platform Server is down Please help! Is there a configuration change or addition we can make in our Stunnel.conf file that will allow us to run v4.53 on our Windows 2000 machine? Regards, Jeff

2 1

set proxy for stunnel client
by Ebrahim Khalilzadeh 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

Dear Users, Hi In our network users connect to internet using http proxy. I have a configuration file like this: [proxy] accept:4444 connect:remote_ip:remote_port connecting to remote ip needs http proxy. I tested some configurations like this: [proxy] protocol = connect protocolHost = proxy_ip:proxy_port accept:4444 connect:remote_ip:remote_port or [proxy] protocol = proxy protocolHost = proxy_ip:proxy_port accept:4444 connect:remote_ip:remote_port But now no success!!! How can i set stunnel to use proxy? Regards, Ebrahim khalilzadeh --

1 0

Stunnel running for a few minutes and then stop and can't handle multiple domains
by Thomas Manson 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

Hi, I've setup a stunnel install to handle several website SSL part of the HTTP (then redirected to HAProxy LoadBalancer). I can successfully start one site, but if I add another website (so another stunnel conf file in /etc/stunnel) then the first is said to be already running while it's not and the second starts for real. thomas@ns0:/var/log/stunnel4$ sudo service stunnel4 start Starting SSL tunnels: [Started: /etc/stunnel/base.conf] [Started: /etc/stunnel/extranet.onesite.com.conf] *[Already running: /etc/stunnel/mansonthomas.com.conf] stunnel.* (mansonthomas.com was my first try before implementing a client website) Also, in /var/log/stunnel.log I've only the logs for base.conf, not for the two other one. What should I do to have the logs? I've tryed to add debug=7 at the beginning of the two conf file, but nothing. After some times, the extranet site https stops working... I was off in holidays for the last two weeks, so I didn't have the time to really dig into this... what would be the first steps to debug this issues ? Regards, Thomas. 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG5[8181:140471188047648]: Reading configuration from file /etc/stunnel/base.conf 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /dev/urandom 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: PRNG seeded successfully 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Using DH parameters from /etc/stunnel/sites/mainsite.com/mainsite.com.crt 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG6[8181:140471188047648]: DH initialized with 2048 bit key 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: ECDH initialized 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/sites/mainsite.com/mainsite.com.crt 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Certificate loaded 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/sites/mainsite.com/mainsite.com.key 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Private key loaded 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: SSL context initialized for service https-mainsite.com 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG5[8181:140471188047648]: Configuration successful 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG5[8181:140471188047648]: No limit detected for the number of clients 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=3 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=4 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=4 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=5 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=5 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=6 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=6 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=7 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=7 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: libwrap_init: FD=8 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: signal_pipe: FD=9 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: signal_pipe: FD=10 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: accept socket: FD=11 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Service https-mainsite.combound to 8.19.1.2:443 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8181:140471188047648]: Service https-mainsite.comopened FD=11 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG7[8187:140471188047648]: Created pid file /var/run/stunnel4/stunnel4.pid 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG5[8187:140471188047648]: stunnel 4.35 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 1.0.0e 6 Sep 2011 2012.03.29 15:31:41 LOG5[8187:140471188047648]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2012.03.29 15:31:49 LOG7[8187:140471188047648]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2012.03.29 15:31:49 LOG5[8187:140471188047648]: Received signal 15; terminating 2012.03.29 15:31:49 LOG7[8187:140471188047648]: removing pid file /var/run/stunnel4/stunnel4.pid 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG5[8280:140481745549088]: Reading configuration from file /etc/stunnel/base.conf 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /dev/urandom 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: PRNG seeded successfully 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Using DH parameters from /etc/stunnel/sites/mainsite.com/mainsite.com.crt 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG6[8280:140481745549088]: DH initialized with 2048 bit key 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: ECDH initialized 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/sites/mainsite.com/mainsite.com.crt 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Certificate loaded 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/sites/mainsite.com/mainsite.com.key 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Private key loaded 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: SSL context initialized for service https-mainsite.com 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG5[8280:140481745549088]: Configuration successful 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG5[8280:140481745549088]: No limit detected for the number of clients 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=3 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=4 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=4 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=5 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=5 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=6 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=6 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=7 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=7 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: libwrap_init: FD=8 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: signal_pipe: FD=9 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: signal_pipe: FD=10 allocated (blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: accept socket: FD=11 allocated (non-blocking mode) 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Option SO_REUSEADDR set on accept socket 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Service https-mainsite.combound to 8.19.1.2:443 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8280:140481745549088]: Service https-mainsite.comopened FD=11 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG7[8286:140481745549088]: Created pid file /var/run/stunnel4/stunnel4.pid 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG5[8286:140481745549088]: stunnel 4.35 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 1.0.0e 6 Sep 2011 2012.03.29 15:32:38 LOG5[8286:140481745549088]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP

1 2

Looking for help - Stunnel works with Gmail but not with my provider
by Verberne, Pieter 31 Mar '12

31 Mar '12

Hello, I have successfully used stunnel with blat to send e-mails from my gmail accounts. Getting this to work with my new internet provider "Ziggo" in The Netherlands seems impossible, despite days spent on the internet searching for help and trying numerous configurations. Whatever I do, there is always this message: SSL_connect: 1408F10B: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number Any help would be highly appreciated. Pieter Verberne PC: i7 OS: Windows 7 - 64bits Stunnel version: 4.53 When sending an e-mail from my PC with Thunderbird 2.0 I can successfully use TLS but not SSL. My provider says about secure smtp connections on their website: Outgoing mail server smtp.ziggo.nl (port number 587) Use of SSL (Secure Socket Layer) / TLS yes For this server is verification required / identity check yes User name your e-mail address Password your e-mail password Stunnel.conf: # GLOBAL OPTIONS debug = 7 output = D:\Pieter\Temp\stunnel-log.txt fips = no cert = stunnel.pem # SERVICE-LEVEL OPTIONS [SMTP Ziggo] client = yes options = NO_SSLv2 options = NO_SSLv3 sslVersion = TLSv1 accept = 587 connect = smtp.ziggo.nl:587 stunnel-log.txt: 2012.03.31 12:04:33 LOG7[2460:2516]: No limit detected for the number of clients 2012.03.31 12:04:33 LOG5[2460:2516]: stunnel 4.53 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu platform 2012.03.31 12:04:33 LOG5[2460:2516]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 0.9.8s-fips 4 Jan 2012 2012.03.31 12:04:33 LOG5[2460:2516]: Threading:WIN32 SSL:+ENGINE+OCSP+FIPS Auth:none Sockets:SELECT+IPv6 2012.03.31 12:04:33 LOG5[2460:2516]: Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf 2012.03.31 12:04:33 LOG5[2460:2516]: FIPS mode is disabled 2012.03.31 12:04:33 LOG7[2460:2516]: Compression not enabled 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: PRNG seeded successfully 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG6[2460:2516]: Initializing service section [SMTP Ziggo] 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: Certificate: stunnel.pem 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: Certificate loaded 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: Key file: stunnel.pem 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: Private key loaded 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: SSL options set: 0x03000004 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG5[2460:2516]: Configuration successful 2012.03.31 12:04:34 LOG7[2460:2516]: Service [SMTP Ziggo] (FD=308) bound to 0.0.0.0:587 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:2516]: Service [SMTP Ziggo] accepted (FD=436) from 192.168.3.11:49195 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:2516]: Creating a new thread 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:2516]: New thread created 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:3652]: Service [SMTP Ziggo] started 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG5[2460:3652]: Service [SMTP Ziggo] accepted connection from 192.168.3.11:49195 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG6[2460:3652]: connect_blocking: connecting 212.xx.xx.x:587 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:3652]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait 212.xx.xx.x:587: waiting 10 seconds 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG5[2460:3652]: connect_blocking: connected 212.xx.xx.x:587 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG5[2460:3652]: Service [SMTP Ziggo] connected remote server from 192.168.3.11:49196 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:3652]: Remote socket (FD=460) initialized 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG3[2460:3652]: *SSL_connect: 1408F10B: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number* 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG5[2460:3652]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to SSL, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:3652]: Remote socket (FD=460) closed 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:3652]: Local socket (FD=436) closed 2012.03.31 12:06:01 LOG7[2460:3652]: Service [SMTP Ziggo] finished (0 left) 2012.03.31 12:18:01 LOG7[2460:2516]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe 2012.03.31 12:18:04 LOG7[2460:2516]: Processing SIGNAL_TERMINATE

1 0