[stunnel-users] [patch] options-related-to-TLS-v1.1-v1.2
henrik.riomar at gmail.com
Fri Sep 21 03:50:13 CEST 2012
On 09/21/2012 12:31 AM, Henrik Riomar wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 06:32 PM, Michal Trojnara wrote:
>> From what I understand from the OpenSSL source, explicit handling of
>> OPENSSL_NO_TLS1_2_CLIENT in stunnel is probably not a good idea.
> ah yes :-) my thinking was that if an end-user sets a TLSv1.2...
after thinking about this some more... yes you are right, it is not a
got idea, that check should be removed.
More information about the stunnel-users