[stunnel-users] [patch] options-related-to-TLS-v1.1-v1.2
henrik.riomar at gmail.com
Fri Sep 21 00:31:14 CEST 2012
On 09/20/2012 06:32 PM, Michal Trojnara wrote:
> Thank you for the patch. I will include it with the next stunnel.
> From what I understand from the OpenSSL source, explicit handling of
> OPENSSL_NO_TLS1_2_CLIENT in stunnel is probably not a good idea.
ah yes :-) my thinking was that if an end-user sets a TLSv1.2 option he
expects TLSv1.2 if the option is accepted by the software. Maybe we can
log a warning about it instead in stunnel (instead of explicit
handling), if that define is set and TLSv1.2 is configured by the end-user?
More information about the stunnel-users