[stunnel-users] older browsers, stunnel and privoxy

kovacs janos kovacsjanosfasz at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 17:49:16 CET 2018

sorry for that, but nginx and squid both dont work on my setup, and
look too heavy for simply decrypting and forwarding.

regarding privoxy, i have tried on other computers with new browsers
to connect to TLS 1.1 - TLS 1.2 only sites through privoxy, with no
stunnel, and it worked. (for example: https://www.deviantart.com/  if
someone wants to see)

i also set 'accept-intercepted-requests 1' in config, but that didnt
work either.

does this mean stunnel encrypts requests differently than browsers? or
the connection between browser and proxy is different than stunnel and
proxy? i dont understand, and im sorry for bothering people

On 12/16/18, Zizhong Zhang <zizazit at protonmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, December 16, 2018 12:35 AM, Javier <jamilist.stn at gmx.es> wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 21:54:33 +0100
>> kovacs janos kovacsjanosfasz at gmail.com wrote:
>> > if so, can anyone tell me a proxy that can, and preferably doesnt do
>> > anything else? and works on windows?
>> Can't help with that, sorry.
> No you can't, because people in this thread, me included, had offered other
> solutions (i.e., nginx and squid) but they have been blatantly ignored.
> I don't think anyone can help if one has such a fixation on stunnel and
> privoxy.
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

More information about the stunnel-users mailing list