[stunnel-users] stunnel v5.32 (and older) strange session cache behavior on memory (de)allocation
adrian.irimescu.iri at gmail.com
Fri May 20 10:24:12 CEST 2016
I've done some tests with stunnel v5.33b2 and I can confirm that this
version fixes the memory leak I reported (and after the session cache is
filled with entries, stunnel does not allocate more memory for next
One more question: do you have any recommendation for session cache size?
On my systems I have set this to 30000. I have 32 GB of RAM so the memory
is not the problem. My concerns are about time spent to search for entries
in cache if I grow session cache size over 100000 entries.
Thank you for your response.
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Michał Trojnara <
Michal.Trojnara at stunnel.org> wrote:
> On 16.05.2016 09:42, Adrian Irimescu wrote:
> > Instead of this the stunnel allocates about 28K for any new session
> > which does not have a stored session in cache and does not free this
> > anymore.
> Please try:
> In my tests this fixes the memory leak you reported.
> Best regards,
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the stunnel-users