[stunnel-users] since version 5.22 stunnel doesn't compile when OpenSSL version < 1.0.0 is used
josealf at rocketmail.com
Thu Aug 6 16:15:04 CEST 2015
Yes, it compiles and runs fine for me. Thanks for quickly addressing the issue.
For those of us who compile with mingw under windows, there is a small typo in file src/mingw.mak as shown below:
--- mingw.mak.distro Sat May 23 11:55:47 2015
+++ mingw.mak Wed Aug 05 23:03:18 2015
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
OBJS=$(OBJ)/stunnel.o $(OBJ)/ssl.o $(OBJ)/ctx.o $(OBJ)/verify.o \
$(OBJ)/file.o $(OBJ)/client.o $(OBJ)/protocol.o $(OBJ)/sthreads.o \
$(OBJ)/log.o $(OBJ)/options.o $(OBJ)/network.o $(OBJ)/resolver.o \
- $(OBJ)/ui_win_gui.o $(OBJ)/resources.o $(OBJ)/str.o $(OBJ)\tls.obj \
+ $(OBJ)/ui_win_gui.o $(OBJ)/resources.o $(OBJ)/str.o $(OBJ)/tls.o \
$(OBJ)/fd.o $(OBJ)/dhparam.o $(OBJ)/cron.o
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 7:07 AM, Josealf.rm <josealf at rocketmail.com> wrote:
I think Michal did not see your patch, but mine because it was inline and yours was attached. Well done!
> El 6/8/2015, a las 6:50, Eugene Rudoy <gene.devel at gmail.com> escribió:
> Hi Michał,
> as far as I can see your patch is (from the functional point of view)
> absolutely identical to that I submitted in my first mail. That's why
> I'll stick to my version till the next official release (just too lazy
> to recompile it).
> Thanks for looking into it.
> Best regards,
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Michal Trojnara
> <Michal.Trojnara at mirt.net> wrote:
>> The enclosed patch allows stunnel to build while preserving as much of
>> the OCSP functionality as it is possible with the old OpenSSL.
>> Please also test stunnel 5.23b2:
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the stunnel-users