[stunnel-users] limited number of ports
bwilkins at gmail.com
Fri Apr 5 19:09:24 CEST 2013
Yes, you can. I currently do it.
On Apr 5, 2013 12:19 PM, "Javier" <meresponde2001-stn at yahoo.es> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 12:52:09 -0400
> Brian Wilkins <bwilkins at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It is possible to setup stunnel as separate services. I don't
> > know if this would be a suitable workaround for you.
> Since, I can't recall the version (edit: probably since 4.16 as
> Michal stated in the link below), it is not possible to run more
> than one instance of stunnel. You can just create service level
> configurations in the conf file and nothing else. (Previously I,
> myself, had 2 conf files for client and server too)
> If there are only allowed 64 services (and therefore ports), I
> think it might be considered as a new feature to add or as a bug.
> I never need such ammount of services, but could be interesting to
> fix and allow more. I wouldn't say 65535 minus 1028 but a few more
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the stunnel-users