[stunnel-users] Console-only version for Windows

Thu Nov 15 15:59:52 CET 2012

I use the program as you mentioned here while on a 64-bit Windows 7 OS. I
simply extracted the files to a folder of my choice, modified the
configuration file, opened a command window in this directory without
needing to do so as Admin, and enter this command:  "stunnel.exe conf". it
then runs in the background without need for further attention from me. 

John

From: stunnel-users-bounces at stunnel.org
[mailto:stunnel-users-bounces at stunnel.org] On Behalf Of Brian Wilkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:27 AM
To: Clodo
Cc: stunnel-users at stunnel.org
Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Console-only version for Windows

You can extract the files yourself to your local machine. AFAICT, stunnel
installer makes no significant changes to the registry other than the Start
menu. You can then setup your batch file to install as a service the first
time if it detects that stunnel is not running as a service, or you can just
tell it to launch minimized so it runs in the toolbar.

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Clodo <clodo at clodo.it> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I need to distribute a portable zip with stunnel and config files,
with a simple .bat for newbie. I can't ask to install/uninstall an NT
service.
Also, i don't think (not sure) STunnel require administrator
privileges on the machine (if binded on port > 1024).
Install/uninstall services require it.

> What about running it as a service?
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Clodo <clodo at clodo.it> wrote:
>
>>

> There is a binary version of stunnel for Windows WITHOUT the gui,
> console/terminal only?
>

> I have some different problems with the GUI edition: - Fail to read
> filename with spaces? - If is already in execution and i run

> stunnel.exe with some other parameters, they are ignored and simply
> give the focus to the current instance, so issue with launching
> multiple instances.
>
> Why there isn't any console-only version, exacly like the standard
> linux distribution? The Cygwin version works great, but isn't
> portable, doesn't work without Cygwin environment.
>
> There are some big trouble about that, or simply doesn't exists the
> .mak project file?
>
> I'm also available to pay with a donation a build like that.
>
> I'm waiting for feedback.
>>

>> _______________________________________________ stunnel-users
>> mailing list stunnel-users at stunnel.org
>> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEVAwUBUKPTki/ixHrG0m4LAQKaeQf/ZlppJCYeAeS4NMZ6NAnMKLoUujpmxFY2
37a0eV34wFXO6lhvOeQ4Ab/fpcUbY5kam4ZS79Hsoi3omXfxja8qocC1aochYYNR
oYHwhzDhVgB+YcPFTZnUXg61z46QaW+TxomkQ+v8jl34p4OlkHN7tQTC6aeDAz+s
cRWuMHIy/omePt0Sp/KoPUZ+RpEMZLmBNHGtaOIAgQpmZ15zwR3GhGFvVik7x3RN
p8Y4naQxXK3XC8Hif5mxp7Hp7NCXKLLkgVAQYFi5CCXTe/xO4dbPaeWnhRYlzJup
yPngwPV4pb6P6EPCC3aS2l7CKKh5N5BrsnAXpxQ9cgZer6Sh7vPKZw==
=L89M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20121115/512d4b55/attachment.html>