[stunnel-users] Question about behavior with "failover = prio"

Wed Jul 22 15:12:36 CEST 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21.07.2015 00:09, Michael Gebis wrote:
> Please let me know if I am misunderstanding the intended behavior
> of the 'prio' failover strategy.

You understand it correctly.  The "failover = prio" feature is indeed
broken since stunnel 5.15.  Your fix is also correct: the
rr_val/rr_ptr values should not be used for the 'prio' strategy.

Thank you for reporting the bug.  It will be fixed in the next release.

Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=rZ36
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----