[stunnel-users] Dynamic hosts
riegel at clearimageonline.com
Wed Jun 24 13:57:30 CEST 2009
> There is also a '--with-threads=pthread' option that may help to lower
> the number of processes.
> However, on modern operating systems, fork()ing is not as expensive as
> it looks like. In most cases, the text segment is shared between the
> two processes and the pages on data/BSS segments are not copied until
> changed ('copy-on-write'). I don't know if the usage of OS resources
> is larger for the multi-threaded or the multi-tasked approach.
Perhaps I am confused, but are you saying that when firing up stunnel
twice with two separate configuration files they are sharing resources?
Sorry about not posting to list earlier.
More information about the stunnel-users