Hi Scott, 

Yes, that's the cipher I'm using which seems to cover everything from a secure ciphers point of view.  Any idea how to disable client renegotiations within Stunnel?

Shannon

On 25 May 2012 14:39, Scott McKeown <scott@loadbalancer.org> wrote:
Hi Shannon,

From what I understand so far a minimum Cipher list of 'RC4:HIGH:!MD5:!aNULL' along with stopping the Client Renegotiating the ciphers seems to resolve the problem.

In Pound the patch allows for two new options to be set:
SSLHonorCipherOrder & SSLAllowClientRenegotiation

I've looked in the OpenSSL documentation but I don't seem to be able to find anything that has the same functionality although I'm no expert so I may have just over looked it.


~Scott



On 25 May 2012 14:30, Shannon Carver <shannon.carver@gmail.com> wrote:
I posted a similar question a few months back, but didnt' get a reply.  Would love some more info on this!

Shannon

On 25 May 2012 11:50, Scott McKeown <scott@loadbalancer.org> wrote:
Hi All,

Has anyone looked at the current issue with the BEAST Attack.

I'm looking at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/index.html which can be used for testing SSL Certificates I also use Pound Proxy which I have now patched and this has removed the threat.

However, I don't seem to be able to get the same result from a STunnel installation. If anyone can give some advice that would be great.


~Yours,
Scott

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
stunnel-users@stunnel.org
http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users