[stunnel-users] Possible signal handling bug in fork mode

Tue Mar 15 21:14:36 CET 2016

Hi,

Thanks for your reply. I won't argue forever on this minor aspect. In
closing I simply want to say I find it very unusual to send a signal to a
child and see it processed by the parent. Are there other servers out there
behaving this way?

Regards,

2016-03-14 13:16 GMT-04:00 Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara at stunnel.org>:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 14.03.2016 16:52, Philippe Anctil wrote:
> > Is there any chance this patch will be included in a future
> > release?
>
> No, there is not.  Stunnel works as it was designed to work.
> I can see no reason to change the design.
>
> Best regards,
>         Mike
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW5vHbAAoJEC78f/DUFuAUC98P/iTzjb5lwFFu1OwjRueXMj7M
> DrpvgvRSaIR5a0y6Ver/jfE6E0MYkKhaMREysjStwTP3prcrjujslh8iSt5Mo1df
> wtpIDhCT1EVrMRXNm01xfhQbKh+//HW4mfBGNENw6JSt/+sAueibWw2NwZ2AF8iF
> L8Xlf8qf7CwnmxL2dh893d3aeqBqMDeEe7b3foD3bgM2aDUxpIXsOaIQdTG4WKoY
> nWkVnbeOB9oyNqucGqIU53ceYTrBUl+aX71tR3VEkbZvChAG4dxJuZqea2gp7OTc
> 9TdjYR8d2KCnk+EbP/RBDUg8+jL2hJUIF2CnDAWZRgP7aIqk24jLsLjSha9Oj7cS
> gRFUU+4RlhzeRjnqiiSjcAukD3El6jfIk3xi//ZfU/5ItQjmObaPaLKkL2zm5iuR
> k3Md07bxvcEzquagVhxxdVKFU2f3D2+0esyxUOYsulK2geHKkg5uqZYLd6tZjFgI
> F9MkNlE4rRy9SbKifDIbLjUFAePh0yq5R1279U+y/250gbZsB4jDfZnZCFlOVUq0
> UwOh/XUr+jdxyXvcLuK2zk3ne82cXDDCdG7JfWS+XV/Tl0cY3J/FiujR8tAj5sSz
> FsH1G+3Cx4bWO1xqEDb5cJYhcBi9JAept1OT5GF27cVskup1FP7NU6GmHkj2skfy
> YxyS5+QkPyeC4qmSvdBN
> =3PMO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>

-- 
Philippe Anctil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20160315/db260189/attachment.html>