[stunnel-users] Possible leak in client.c:init_ssl()

• Previous message (by thread): [stunnel-users] Possible leak in client.c:init_ssl()
• Next message (by thread): [stunnel-users] Possible leak in client.c:init_ssl()
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sven Ulland wrote:
> Is it so that the
> number of ssl/connections allocated by stunnel is always the maximum
> observed throughout the entire runtime, i.e. it never frees up idle
> connections? That's not really a problem, I'm just curious.

In order to free up an idle connection stunnel would have to close  
it.  In many cases connections supposed to be persistent.  The timeout  
is controlled with TIMEOUTidle option.  The default value is 43200  
seconds = 12 hours.

> I recompiled 0.9.8r with zlib enabled again, but it's not clear to me
> if zlib was actually used in the following run or not. At least there
> were no zlib or libz strings in the massif output.
>
> I'll assume it's the OpenSSL issues that were at fault, and then
> continue to run with the new lib version. If there is any new
> development in the upcoming days, I'll send a follow-up.

I'll appreciate it.

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20110412/5b2a0c23/attachment.sig>

• Previous message (by thread): [stunnel-users] Possible leak in client.c:init_ssl()
• Next message (by thread): [stunnel-users] Possible leak in client.c:init_ssl()
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]